Cargando…

Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To assess risk of bias and to investigate methodological issues concerning the design, conduct and analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and four major Chin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Pengli, Tang, Li, Yu, Jiajie, Lee, Andy H, Zhou, Xu, Kang, Deying, Luo, Yanan, Liu, Jiali, Sun, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019847
_version_ 1783307047959265280
author Jia, Pengli
Tang, Li
Yu, Jiajie
Lee, Andy H
Zhou, Xu
Kang, Deying
Luo, Yanan
Liu, Jiali
Sun, Xin
author_facet Jia, Pengli
Tang, Li
Yu, Jiajie
Lee, Andy H
Zhou, Xu
Kang, Deying
Luo, Yanan
Liu, Jiali
Sun, Xin
author_sort Jia, Pengli
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess risk of bias and to investigate methodological issues concerning the design, conduct and analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and four major Chinese databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the effect of acupuncture for KOA. The Cochrane tool was used to examine the risk of bias of eligible RCTs. Their methodological details were examined using a standardised and pilot-tested questionnaire of 48 items, together with the association between four predefined factors and important methodological quality indicators. RESULTS: A total of 248 RCTs were eligible, of which 39 (15.7%) used computer-generated randomisation sequence. Of the 31 (12.5%) trials that stated the allocation concealment, only one used central randomisation. Twenty-five (10.1%) trials mentioned that their acupuncture procedures were standardised, but only 18 (7.3%) specified how the standardisation was achieved. The great majority of trials (n=233, 94%) stated that blinding was in place, but 204 (87.6%) did not clarify who was blinded. Only 27 (10.9%) trials specified the primary outcome, for which 7 used intention-to-treat analysis. Only 17 (6.9%) trials included details on sample size calculation; none preplanned an interim analysis and associated stopping rule. In total, 46 (18.5%) trials explicitly stated that loss to follow-up occurred, but only 6 (2.4%) provided some information to deal with the issue. No trials prespecified, conducted or reported any subgroup or adjusted analysis for the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: The overall risk of bias was high among published RCTs testing acupuncture for KOA. Methodological limitations were present in many important aspects of design, conduct and analyses. These findings inform the development of evidence-based methodological guidance for future trials assessing the effect of acupuncture for KOA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58551802018-03-19 Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study Jia, Pengli Tang, Li Yu, Jiajie Lee, Andy H Zhou, Xu Kang, Deying Luo, Yanan Liu, Jiali Sun, Xin BMJ Open Complementary Medicine OBJECTIVE: To assess risk of bias and to investigate methodological issues concerning the design, conduct and analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and four major Chinese databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the effect of acupuncture for KOA. The Cochrane tool was used to examine the risk of bias of eligible RCTs. Their methodological details were examined using a standardised and pilot-tested questionnaire of 48 items, together with the association between four predefined factors and important methodological quality indicators. RESULTS: A total of 248 RCTs were eligible, of which 39 (15.7%) used computer-generated randomisation sequence. Of the 31 (12.5%) trials that stated the allocation concealment, only one used central randomisation. Twenty-five (10.1%) trials mentioned that their acupuncture procedures were standardised, but only 18 (7.3%) specified how the standardisation was achieved. The great majority of trials (n=233, 94%) stated that blinding was in place, but 204 (87.6%) did not clarify who was blinded. Only 27 (10.9%) trials specified the primary outcome, for which 7 used intention-to-treat analysis. Only 17 (6.9%) trials included details on sample size calculation; none preplanned an interim analysis and associated stopping rule. In total, 46 (18.5%) trials explicitly stated that loss to follow-up occurred, but only 6 (2.4%) provided some information to deal with the issue. No trials prespecified, conducted or reported any subgroup or adjusted analysis for the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: The overall risk of bias was high among published RCTs testing acupuncture for KOA. Methodological limitations were present in many important aspects of design, conduct and analyses. These findings inform the development of evidence-based methodological guidance for future trials assessing the effect of acupuncture for KOA. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5855180/ /pubmed/29511016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019847 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Complementary Medicine
Jia, Pengli
Tang, Li
Yu, Jiajie
Lee, Andy H
Zhou, Xu
Kang, Deying
Luo, Yanan
Liu, Jiali
Sun, Xin
Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title_full Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title_short Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
title_sort risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
topic Complementary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019847
work_keys_str_mv AT jiapengli riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT tangli riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT yujiajie riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT leeandyh riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhouxu riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT kangdeying riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT luoyanan riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT liujiali riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy
AT sunxin riskofbiasandmethodologicalissuesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureforkneeosteoarthritisacrosssectionalstudy