Cargando…

Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study

OBJECTIVE: Physical healthcare has dominated the patient safety field; research in mental healthcare is not as extensive but findings from physical healthcare cannot be applied to mental healthcare because it delivers specialised care that faces unique challenges. Therefore, a clearer focus and reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewa, Lindsay H, Murray, Kevin, Thibaut, Bethan, Ramtale, Sonny Christian, Adam, Sheila, Darzi, Ara, Archer, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29502096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021361
_version_ 1783307053327974400
author Dewa, Lindsay H
Murray, Kevin
Thibaut, Bethan
Ramtale, Sonny Christian
Adam, Sheila
Darzi, Ara
Archer, Stephanie
author_facet Dewa, Lindsay H
Murray, Kevin
Thibaut, Bethan
Ramtale, Sonny Christian
Adam, Sheila
Darzi, Ara
Archer, Stephanie
author_sort Dewa, Lindsay H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Physical healthcare has dominated the patient safety field; research in mental healthcare is not as extensive but findings from physical healthcare cannot be applied to mental healthcare because it delivers specialised care that faces unique challenges. Therefore, a clearer focus and recognition of patient safety in mental health as a distinct research area is still needed. The study aim is to identify future research priorities in the field of patient safety in mental health. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the experts to ascertain their views on research priorities in patient safety in mental health. A three-round online Delphi study was used to ascertain consensus on 117 research priority statements. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Academic and service user experts from the USA, UK, Switzerland, Netherlands, Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement in research priorities on a five-point scale. RESULTS: Seventy-nine statements achieved consensus (>70%). Three out of the top six research priorities were patient driven; experts agreed that understanding the patient perspective on safety planning, on self-harm and on medication was important. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international Delphi study to identify research priorities in safety in the mental field as determined by expert academic and service user perspectives. A reasonable consensus was obtained from international perspectives on future research priorities in patient safety in mental health; however, the patient perspective on their mental healthcare is a priority. The research agenda for patient safety in mental health identified here should be informed by patient safety science more broadly and used to further establish this area as a priority in its own right. The safety of mental health patients must have parity with that of physical health patients to achieve this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58552032018-03-19 Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study Dewa, Lindsay H Murray, Kevin Thibaut, Bethan Ramtale, Sonny Christian Adam, Sheila Darzi, Ara Archer, Stephanie BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: Physical healthcare has dominated the patient safety field; research in mental healthcare is not as extensive but findings from physical healthcare cannot be applied to mental healthcare because it delivers specialised care that faces unique challenges. Therefore, a clearer focus and recognition of patient safety in mental health as a distinct research area is still needed. The study aim is to identify future research priorities in the field of patient safety in mental health. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the experts to ascertain their views on research priorities in patient safety in mental health. A three-round online Delphi study was used to ascertain consensus on 117 research priority statements. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Academic and service user experts from the USA, UK, Switzerland, Netherlands, Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement in research priorities on a five-point scale. RESULTS: Seventy-nine statements achieved consensus (>70%). Three out of the top six research priorities were patient driven; experts agreed that understanding the patient perspective on safety planning, on self-harm and on medication was important. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international Delphi study to identify research priorities in safety in the mental field as determined by expert academic and service user perspectives. A reasonable consensus was obtained from international perspectives on future research priorities in patient safety in mental health; however, the patient perspective on their mental healthcare is a priority. The research agenda for patient safety in mental health identified here should be informed by patient safety science more broadly and used to further establish this area as a priority in its own right. The safety of mental health patients must have parity with that of physical health patients to achieve this. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5855203/ /pubmed/29502096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021361 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Dewa, Lindsay H
Murray, Kevin
Thibaut, Bethan
Ramtale, Sonny Christian
Adam, Sheila
Darzi, Ara
Archer, Stephanie
Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title_full Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title_fullStr Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title_short Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study
title_sort identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert delphi study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29502096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021361
work_keys_str_mv AT dewalindsayh identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT murraykevin identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT thibautbethan identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT ramtalesonnychristian identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT adamsheila identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT darziara identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy
AT archerstephanie identifyingresearchprioritiesforpatientsafetyinmentalhealthaninternationalexpertdelphistudy