Cargando…

Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma

OBJECTIVES: The nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment surveys. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT discussions to develop survey items on (1) challenges experienced by informal caregivers of people living with systemic sclerosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rice, Danielle B, Cañedo-Ayala, Mara, Turner, Kimberly A, Gumuchian, Stephanie T, Malcarne, Vanessa L, Hagedoorn, Mariët, Thombs, Brett D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019726
_version_ 1783307055925297152
author Rice, Danielle B
Cañedo-Ayala, Mara
Turner, Kimberly A
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Hagedoorn, Mariët
Thombs, Brett D
author_facet Rice, Danielle B
Cañedo-Ayala, Mara
Turner, Kimberly A
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Hagedoorn, Mariët
Thombs, Brett D
author_sort Rice, Danielle B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment surveys. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT discussions to develop survey items on (1) challenges experienced by informal caregivers of people living with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and (2) preferences for support services. DESIGN: Three NGT groups were conducted. In each group, participants generated lists of challenges and preferred formats for support services. Participants shared items, and a master list was compiled, then reviewed by participants to remove or merge overlapping items. Once a final list of items was generated, participants independently rated challenges on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important) and support services on a scale from 1 (not at all likely to use) to 10 (very likely to use). Lists generated in the NGT discussions were subsequently reviewed and integrated into a single list by research team members. SETTING: SSc patient conferences held in the USA and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers who previously or currently were providing care for a family member or friend with SSc. RESULTS: A total of six men and seven women participated in the NGT discussions. Mean age was 59.8 years (SD=12.6). Participants provided care for a partner (n=8), parent (n=1), child (n=2) or friend (n=2). A list of 61 unique challenges was generated with challenges related to gaps in information, resources and support needs identified most frequently. A list of 18 unique support services was generated; most involved online or in-person delivery of emotional support and educational material about SSc. CONCLUSIONS: The NGT was an efficient method for obtaining survey items directly from SSc caregivers on important challenges and preferences for support services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58552142018-03-19 Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma Rice, Danielle B Cañedo-Ayala, Mara Turner, Kimberly A Gumuchian, Stephanie T Malcarne, Vanessa L Hagedoorn, Mariët Thombs, Brett D BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: The nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment surveys. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT discussions to develop survey items on (1) challenges experienced by informal caregivers of people living with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and (2) preferences for support services. DESIGN: Three NGT groups were conducted. In each group, participants generated lists of challenges and preferred formats for support services. Participants shared items, and a master list was compiled, then reviewed by participants to remove or merge overlapping items. Once a final list of items was generated, participants independently rated challenges on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important) and support services on a scale from 1 (not at all likely to use) to 10 (very likely to use). Lists generated in the NGT discussions were subsequently reviewed and integrated into a single list by research team members. SETTING: SSc patient conferences held in the USA and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers who previously or currently were providing care for a family member or friend with SSc. RESULTS: A total of six men and seven women participated in the NGT discussions. Mean age was 59.8 years (SD=12.6). Participants provided care for a partner (n=8), parent (n=1), child (n=2) or friend (n=2). A list of 61 unique challenges was generated with challenges related to gaps in information, resources and support needs identified most frequently. A list of 18 unique support services was generated; most involved online or in-person delivery of emotional support and educational material about SSc. CONCLUSIONS: The NGT was an efficient method for obtaining survey items directly from SSc caregivers on important challenges and preferences for support services. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5855214/ /pubmed/29500214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019726 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Rice, Danielle B
Cañedo-Ayala, Mara
Turner, Kimberly A
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Hagedoorn, Mariët
Thombs, Brett D
Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title_full Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title_fullStr Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title_full_unstemmed Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title_short Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
title_sort use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019726
work_keys_str_mv AT ricedanielleb useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT canedoayalamara useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT turnerkimberlya useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT gumuchianstephaniet useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT malcarnevanessal useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT hagedoornmariet useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma
AT thombsbrettd useofthenominalgrouptechniquetoidentifystakeholderprioritiesandinformsurveydevelopmentanexamplewithinformalcaregiversofpeoplewithscleroderma