Cargando…
Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111 |
_version_ | 1783307059434881024 |
---|---|
author | Nurjono, Milawaty Shrestha, Pami Lee, Alice Lim, Xin Ya Shiraz, Farah Tan, Shermin Wong, Shing Hei Foo, Kah Mun Wee, Thomas Toh, Sue-Anne Yoong, Joanne Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes |
author_facet | Nurjono, Milawaty Shrestha, Pami Lee, Alice Lim, Xin Ya Shiraz, Farah Tan, Shermin Wong, Shing Hei Foo, Kah Mun Wee, Thomas Toh, Sue-Anne Yoong, Joanne Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes |
author_sort | Nurjono, Milawaty |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care network, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), consisting of acute hospitals, step down care, primary care providers, social services and community partners using a theory-driven realist evaluation approach. This study aims to examine how and for whom the NUHS-RHS works to improve healthcare utilisations, outcomes, care experiences and reduce healthcare costs. By using a realist approach that balances the needs of context-specific evaluation with international comparability, this study carries the potential to address current research gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This evaluation will be conducted in three research phases: (1) development of initial programme theory (IPT) underlying the NUHS-RHS; (2) testing of programme theory using empirical data; and (3) refinement of IPT. IPT was elicited and developed through reviews of programme documents, informal discussions and in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders. Then, a convergent parallel mixed method study will be conducted to assess context (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) to test the IPT. Findings will then be analysed according to the realist evaluation formula of CMO in which findings on the context, mechanisms will be used to explain the outcomes. Finally, based on findings gathered, IPT will be refined to highlight how to improve the NUHS-RHS by detailing what works (outcome), as well as how (mechanisms) and under what conditions (context). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Domain Specific Review Board reviewed and approved this study protocol. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and internally to NUHS-RHS and Ministry of Health, Singapore. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5855239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58552392018-03-19 Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study Nurjono, Milawaty Shrestha, Pami Lee, Alice Lim, Xin Ya Shiraz, Farah Tan, Shermin Wong, Shing Hei Foo, Kah Mun Wee, Thomas Toh, Sue-Anne Yoong, Joanne Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care network, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), consisting of acute hospitals, step down care, primary care providers, social services and community partners using a theory-driven realist evaluation approach. This study aims to examine how and for whom the NUHS-RHS works to improve healthcare utilisations, outcomes, care experiences and reduce healthcare costs. By using a realist approach that balances the needs of context-specific evaluation with international comparability, this study carries the potential to address current research gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This evaluation will be conducted in three research phases: (1) development of initial programme theory (IPT) underlying the NUHS-RHS; (2) testing of programme theory using empirical data; and (3) refinement of IPT. IPT was elicited and developed through reviews of programme documents, informal discussions and in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders. Then, a convergent parallel mixed method study will be conducted to assess context (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) to test the IPT. Findings will then be analysed according to the realist evaluation formula of CMO in which findings on the context, mechanisms will be used to explain the outcomes. Finally, based on findings gathered, IPT will be refined to highlight how to improve the NUHS-RHS by detailing what works (outcome), as well as how (mechanisms) and under what conditions (context). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Domain Specific Review Board reviewed and approved this study protocol. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and internally to NUHS-RHS and Ministry of Health, Singapore. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5855239/ /pubmed/29500199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Nurjono, Milawaty Shrestha, Pami Lee, Alice Lim, Xin Ya Shiraz, Farah Tan, Shermin Wong, Shing Hei Foo, Kah Mun Wee, Thomas Toh, Sue-Anne Yoong, Joanne Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title | Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title_full | Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title_short | Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
title_sort | realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nurjonomilawaty realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT shresthapami realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT leealice realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT limxinya realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT shirazfarah realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT tanshermin realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT wongshinghei realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT fookahmun realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT weethomas realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT tohsueanne realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT yoongjoanne realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT mariavrijhoefhubertusjohannes realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy |