Cargando…

Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study

INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nurjono, Milawaty, Shrestha, Pami, Lee, Alice, Lim, Xin Ya, Shiraz, Farah, Tan, Shermin, Wong, Shing Hei, Foo, Kah Mun, Wee, Thomas, Toh, Sue-Anne, Yoong, Joanne, Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111
_version_ 1783307059434881024
author Nurjono, Milawaty
Shrestha, Pami
Lee, Alice
Lim, Xin Ya
Shiraz, Farah
Tan, Shermin
Wong, Shing Hei
Foo, Kah Mun
Wee, Thomas
Toh, Sue-Anne
Yoong, Joanne
Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes
author_facet Nurjono, Milawaty
Shrestha, Pami
Lee, Alice
Lim, Xin Ya
Shiraz, Farah
Tan, Shermin
Wong, Shing Hei
Foo, Kah Mun
Wee, Thomas
Toh, Sue-Anne
Yoong, Joanne
Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes
author_sort Nurjono, Milawaty
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care network, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), consisting of acute hospitals, step down care, primary care providers, social services and community partners using a theory-driven realist evaluation approach. This study aims to examine how and for whom the NUHS-RHS works to improve healthcare utilisations, outcomes, care experiences and reduce healthcare costs. By using a realist approach that balances the needs of context-specific evaluation with international comparability, this study carries the potential to address current research gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This evaluation will be conducted in three research phases: (1) development of initial programme theory (IPT) underlying the NUHS-RHS; (2) testing of programme theory using empirical data; and (3) refinement of IPT. IPT was elicited and developed through reviews of programme documents, informal discussions and in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders. Then, a convergent parallel mixed method study will be conducted to assess context (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) to test the IPT. Findings will then be analysed according to the realist evaluation formula of CMO in which findings on the context, mechanisms will be used to explain the outcomes. Finally, based on findings gathered, IPT will be refined to highlight how to improve the NUHS-RHS by detailing what works (outcome), as well as how (mechanisms) and under what conditions (context). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Domain Specific Review Board reviewed and approved this study protocol. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and internally to NUHS-RHS and Ministry of Health, Singapore.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58552392018-03-19 Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study Nurjono, Milawaty Shrestha, Pami Lee, Alice Lim, Xin Ya Shiraz, Farah Tan, Shermin Wong, Shing Hei Foo, Kah Mun Wee, Thomas Toh, Sue-Anne Yoong, Joanne Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care network, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), consisting of acute hospitals, step down care, primary care providers, social services and community partners using a theory-driven realist evaluation approach. This study aims to examine how and for whom the NUHS-RHS works to improve healthcare utilisations, outcomes, care experiences and reduce healthcare costs. By using a realist approach that balances the needs of context-specific evaluation with international comparability, this study carries the potential to address current research gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This evaluation will be conducted in three research phases: (1) development of initial programme theory (IPT) underlying the NUHS-RHS; (2) testing of programme theory using empirical data; and (3) refinement of IPT. IPT was elicited and developed through reviews of programme documents, informal discussions and in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders. Then, a convergent parallel mixed method study will be conducted to assess context (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) to test the IPT. Findings will then be analysed according to the realist evaluation formula of CMO in which findings on the context, mechanisms will be used to explain the outcomes. Finally, based on findings gathered, IPT will be refined to highlight how to improve the NUHS-RHS by detailing what works (outcome), as well as how (mechanisms) and under what conditions (context). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Domain Specific Review Board reviewed and approved this study protocol. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and internally to NUHS-RHS and Ministry of Health, Singapore. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5855239/ /pubmed/29500199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Nurjono, Milawaty
Shrestha, Pami
Lee, Alice
Lim, Xin Ya
Shiraz, Farah
Tan, Shermin
Wong, Shing Hei
Foo, Kah Mun
Wee, Thomas
Toh, Sue-Anne
Yoong, Joanne
Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes
Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_short Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_sort realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111
work_keys_str_mv AT nurjonomilawaty realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT shresthapami realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT leealice realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT limxinya realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT shirazfarah realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT tanshermin realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT wongshinghei realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT fookahmun realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT weethomas realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT tohsueanne realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT yoongjoanne realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT mariavrijhoefhubertusjohannes realistevaluationofacomplexintegratedcareprogrammeprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy