Cargando…

Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids

The detection of external and internal cues alters gene expression in the brain which in turn may affect neural networks that underly behavioral responses. Previous studies have shown that gene expression profiles differ between major brain regions within individuals and between species with differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derycke, Sofie, Kéver, Loic, Herten, Koen, Van den Berge, Koen, Van Steenberge, Maarten, Van Houdt, Jeroen, Clement, Lieven, Poncin, Pascal, Parmentier, Eric, Verheyen, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00136
_version_ 1783307084092145664
author Derycke, Sofie
Kéver, Loic
Herten, Koen
Van den Berge, Koen
Van Steenberge, Maarten
Van Houdt, Jeroen
Clement, Lieven
Poncin, Pascal
Parmentier, Eric
Verheyen, Erik
author_facet Derycke, Sofie
Kéver, Loic
Herten, Koen
Van den Berge, Koen
Van Steenberge, Maarten
Van Houdt, Jeroen
Clement, Lieven
Poncin, Pascal
Parmentier, Eric
Verheyen, Erik
author_sort Derycke, Sofie
collection PubMed
description The detection of external and internal cues alters gene expression in the brain which in turn may affect neural networks that underly behavioral responses. Previous studies have shown that gene expression profiles differ between major brain regions within individuals and between species with different morphologies, cognitive abilities and/or behaviors. A detailed description of gene expression in all macroanatomical brain regions and in species with similar morphologies and behaviors is however lacking. Here, we dissected the brain of two cichlid species into six macroanatomical regions. Ophthalmotilapia nasuta and O. ventralis have similar morphology and behavior and occasionally hybridize in the wild. We use 3′ mRNA sequencing and a stage-wise statistical testing procedure to identify differential gene expression between females that were kept in a social setting with other females. Our results show that gene expression differs substantially between all six brain parts within species: out of 11,577 assessed genes, 8,748 are differentially expressed (DE) in at least one brain part compared to the average expression of the other brain parts. At most 16% of these DE genes have |log(2)FC| significantly higher than two. Functional differences between brain parts were consistent between species. The majority (61–79%) of genes that are DE in a particular brain part were shared between both species. Only 32 genes show significant differences in fold change across brain parts between species. These genes are mainly linked to transport, transmembrane transport, transcription (and its regulation) and signal transduction. Moreover, statistical equivalence testing reveals that within each comparison, on average 89% of the genes show an equivalent fold change between both species. The pronounced differences in gene expression between brain parts and the conserved patterns between closely related species with similar morphologies and behavior suggest that unraveling the interactions between genes and behavior will benefit from neurogenomic profiling of distinct brain regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58553552018-03-28 Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids Derycke, Sofie Kéver, Loic Herten, Koen Van den Berge, Koen Van Steenberge, Maarten Van Houdt, Jeroen Clement, Lieven Poncin, Pascal Parmentier, Eric Verheyen, Erik Front Neurosci Neuroscience The detection of external and internal cues alters gene expression in the brain which in turn may affect neural networks that underly behavioral responses. Previous studies have shown that gene expression profiles differ between major brain regions within individuals and between species with different morphologies, cognitive abilities and/or behaviors. A detailed description of gene expression in all macroanatomical brain regions and in species with similar morphologies and behaviors is however lacking. Here, we dissected the brain of two cichlid species into six macroanatomical regions. Ophthalmotilapia nasuta and O. ventralis have similar morphology and behavior and occasionally hybridize in the wild. We use 3′ mRNA sequencing and a stage-wise statistical testing procedure to identify differential gene expression between females that were kept in a social setting with other females. Our results show that gene expression differs substantially between all six brain parts within species: out of 11,577 assessed genes, 8,748 are differentially expressed (DE) in at least one brain part compared to the average expression of the other brain parts. At most 16% of these DE genes have |log(2)FC| significantly higher than two. Functional differences between brain parts were consistent between species. The majority (61–79%) of genes that are DE in a particular brain part were shared between both species. Only 32 genes show significant differences in fold change across brain parts between species. These genes are mainly linked to transport, transmembrane transport, transcription (and its regulation) and signal transduction. Moreover, statistical equivalence testing reveals that within each comparison, on average 89% of the genes show an equivalent fold change between both species. The pronounced differences in gene expression between brain parts and the conserved patterns between closely related species with similar morphologies and behavior suggest that unraveling the interactions between genes and behavior will benefit from neurogenomic profiling of distinct brain regions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5855355/ /pubmed/29593484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00136 Text en Copyright © 2018 Derycke, Kéver, Herten, Van den Berge, Van Steenberge, Van Houdt, Clement, Poncin, Parmentier and Verheyen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Derycke, Sofie
Kéver, Loic
Herten, Koen
Van den Berge, Koen
Van Steenberge, Maarten
Van Houdt, Jeroen
Clement, Lieven
Poncin, Pascal
Parmentier, Eric
Verheyen, Erik
Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title_full Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title_fullStr Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title_full_unstemmed Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title_short Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Between Brain Parts That Are Consistent in Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
title_sort neurogenomic profiling reveals distinct gene expression profiles between brain parts that are consistent in ophthalmotilapia cichlids
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00136
work_keys_str_mv AT deryckesofie neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT keverloic neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT hertenkoen neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT vandenbergekoen neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT vansteenbergemaarten neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT vanhoudtjeroen neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT clementlieven neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT poncinpascal neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT parmentiereric neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids
AT verheyenerik neurogenomicprofilingrevealsdistinctgeneexpressionprofilesbetweenbrainpartsthatareconsistentinophthalmotilapiacichlids