Cargando…

Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in early pregnancy is routine in New Zealand to identify women with diabetes and prediabetes. However, the benefit of early intervention in women with prediabetes is inconclusive. Our aim was to test the feasibility of a two-arm parallel randomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Ruth C E, Rowan, Janet, Williman, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29502087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018493
_version_ 1783307092793229312
author Hughes, Ruth C E
Rowan, Janet
Williman, Jonathan
author_facet Hughes, Ruth C E
Rowan, Janet
Williman, Jonathan
author_sort Hughes, Ruth C E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in early pregnancy is routine in New Zealand to identify women with diabetes and prediabetes. However, the benefit of early intervention in women with prediabetes is inconclusive. Our aim was to test the feasibility of a two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial of standard care versus early intervention in pregnancies complicated by prediabetes. SETTING: Two tertiary referral centres in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Women <14 weeks’ gestation and HbA1c ≥5.9%–6.4% (41–46 mmol/mol) measured at booking, without pre-existing diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation was done by remote web-based allocation into one of two groups. Women in the early intervention group attended an antenatal diabetes clinic, commenced daily home blood glucose monitoring, and medication was prescribed if lifestyle measures failed to maintain target blood glucose levels. Controls received lifestyle education, continued standard care with their midwife and/or obstetrician, and were asked to perform a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24 weeks’ gestation with a referral to clinic if this test was positive. Both groups received lifestyle questionnaires at recruitment and in late pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment rate, adherence to protocol and validation of potential primary outcomes. RESULTS: Recruitment rates were lower than expected, especially in Māori and Pacific women. Non-adherence to allocated treatment protocol was significant, 42% (95% CI 24% to 61%) in the early intervention group and 30% (95% CI 16% to 51%) in controls. Caesarean section and pre-eclampsia were signalled as potential primary outcomes, due to both the high observed incidence in the control group and ease of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: For a future definitive trial, extending the gestation of eligibility and stepped-wedge cluster randomisation may overcome the identified feasibility issues. Consistent with published observational data, pre-eclampsia and emergency caesarean section could be included as primary outcome measures, both of which have a significant impact on maternal and neonatal morbidity and healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000904572; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58553922018-03-19 Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial Hughes, Ruth C E Rowan, Janet Williman, Jonathan BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in early pregnancy is routine in New Zealand to identify women with diabetes and prediabetes. However, the benefit of early intervention in women with prediabetes is inconclusive. Our aim was to test the feasibility of a two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial of standard care versus early intervention in pregnancies complicated by prediabetes. SETTING: Two tertiary referral centres in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Women <14 weeks’ gestation and HbA1c ≥5.9%–6.4% (41–46 mmol/mol) measured at booking, without pre-existing diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation was done by remote web-based allocation into one of two groups. Women in the early intervention group attended an antenatal diabetes clinic, commenced daily home blood glucose monitoring, and medication was prescribed if lifestyle measures failed to maintain target blood glucose levels. Controls received lifestyle education, continued standard care with their midwife and/or obstetrician, and were asked to perform a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24 weeks’ gestation with a referral to clinic if this test was positive. Both groups received lifestyle questionnaires at recruitment and in late pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment rate, adherence to protocol and validation of potential primary outcomes. RESULTS: Recruitment rates were lower than expected, especially in Māori and Pacific women. Non-adherence to allocated treatment protocol was significant, 42% (95% CI 24% to 61%) in the early intervention group and 30% (95% CI 16% to 51%) in controls. Caesarean section and pre-eclampsia were signalled as potential primary outcomes, due to both the high observed incidence in the control group and ease of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: For a future definitive trial, extending the gestation of eligibility and stepped-wedge cluster randomisation may overcome the identified feasibility issues. Consistent with published observational data, pre-eclampsia and emergency caesarean section could be included as primary outcome measures, both of which have a significant impact on maternal and neonatal morbidity and healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000904572; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5855392/ /pubmed/29502087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018493 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Hughes, Ruth C E
Rowan, Janet
Williman, Jonathan
Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title_full Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title_short Prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? A feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
title_sort prediabetes in pregnancy, can early intervention improve outcomes? a feasibility study for a parallel randomised clinical trial
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29502087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018493
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesruthce prediabetesinpregnancycanearlyinterventionimproveoutcomesafeasibilitystudyforaparallelrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT rowanjanet prediabetesinpregnancycanearlyinterventionimproveoutcomesafeasibilitystudyforaparallelrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT willimanjonathan prediabetesinpregnancycanearlyinterventionimproveoutcomesafeasibilitystudyforaparallelrandomisedclinicaltrial