Cargando…
Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850 |
_version_ | 1783307098611777536 |
---|---|
author | Blade, Joan Calleja, Miguel Ángel Lahuerta, Juan José Poveda, José Luis de Paz, Héctor David Lizán, Luis |
author_facet | Blade, Joan Calleja, Miguel Ángel Lahuerta, Juan José Poveda, José Luis de Paz, Héctor David Lizán, Luis |
author_sort | Blade, Joan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (haematologists, hospital pharmacists and patients) were identified by the scientific committee, the Spanish Program of Haematology Treatments Foundation, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacies and the Spanish Community of Patients with MM. Panellist’s perception about outcomes’ suitability and feasibility of use was assessed on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached when at least 75% of the respondents reached agreement or disagreement. A scientific committee led the project. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 45 panellists participated in the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Consensus was reached to use overall survival, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease and treatment response to assess survival and disease control. Panellists agreed to measure health-related quality of life, pain, performance status, fatigue, psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image, sexuality and preferences/satisfaction. However, panellist did not reach consensus about the feasibility of assessing in routine practice psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image and sexuality. Consensus was reached to collect patient-reported outcomes through the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core questionnaire 30 (C30), three items from EORTC-QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) and EORTC-QLQ-Breast Cancer (BR23), pain Visual Analogue Scale, Morisky-Green and ad hoc questions about patients’ preferences/satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: A consensual standard set of outcomes for managing newly diagnosed patients with MM has been defined. The feasibility of its implementation in routine practice will be assessed in a future pilot study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5855445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58554452018-03-19 Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project Blade, Joan Calleja, Miguel Ángel Lahuerta, Juan José Poveda, José Luis de Paz, Héctor David Lizán, Luis BMJ Open Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (haematologists, hospital pharmacists and patients) were identified by the scientific committee, the Spanish Program of Haematology Treatments Foundation, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacies and the Spanish Community of Patients with MM. Panellist’s perception about outcomes’ suitability and feasibility of use was assessed on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached when at least 75% of the respondents reached agreement or disagreement. A scientific committee led the project. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 45 panellists participated in the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Consensus was reached to use overall survival, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease and treatment response to assess survival and disease control. Panellists agreed to measure health-related quality of life, pain, performance status, fatigue, psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image, sexuality and preferences/satisfaction. However, panellist did not reach consensus about the feasibility of assessing in routine practice psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image and sexuality. Consensus was reached to collect patient-reported outcomes through the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core questionnaire 30 (C30), three items from EORTC-QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) and EORTC-QLQ-Breast Cancer (BR23), pain Visual Analogue Scale, Morisky-Green and ad hoc questions about patients’ preferences/satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: A consensual standard set of outcomes for managing newly diagnosed patients with MM has been defined. The feasibility of its implementation in routine practice will be assessed in a future pilot study. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5855445/ /pubmed/29472263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) Blade, Joan Calleja, Miguel Ángel Lahuerta, Juan José Poveda, José Luis de Paz, Héctor David Lizán, Luis Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title | Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title_full | Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title_fullStr | Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title_short | Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project |
title_sort | defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the delphi consensus method: the importa project |
topic | Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bladejoan definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject AT callejamiguelangel definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject AT lahuertajuanjose definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject AT povedajoseluis definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject AT depazhectordavid definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject AT lizanluis definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject |