Cargando…

Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project

OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blade, Joan, Calleja, Miguel Ángel, Lahuerta, Juan José, Poveda, José Luis, de Paz, Héctor David, Lizán, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850
_version_ 1783307098611777536
author Blade, Joan
Calleja, Miguel Ángel
Lahuerta, Juan José
Poveda, José Luis
de Paz, Héctor David
Lizán, Luis
author_facet Blade, Joan
Calleja, Miguel Ángel
Lahuerta, Juan José
Poveda, José Luis
de Paz, Héctor David
Lizán, Luis
author_sort Blade, Joan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (haematologists, hospital pharmacists and patients) were identified by the scientific committee, the Spanish Program of Haematology Treatments Foundation, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacies and the Spanish Community of Patients with MM. Panellist’s perception about outcomes’ suitability and feasibility of use was assessed on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached when at least 75% of the respondents reached agreement or disagreement. A scientific committee led the project. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 45 panellists participated in the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Consensus was reached to use overall survival, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease and treatment response to assess survival and disease control. Panellists agreed to measure health-related quality of life, pain, performance status, fatigue, psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image, sexuality and preferences/satisfaction. However, panellist did not reach consensus about the feasibility of assessing in routine practice psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image and sexuality. Consensus was reached to collect patient-reported outcomes through the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core questionnaire 30 (C30), three items from EORTC-QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) and EORTC-QLQ-Breast Cancer (BR23), pain Visual Analogue Scale, Morisky-Green and ad hoc questions about patients’ preferences/satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: A consensual standard set of outcomes for managing newly diagnosed patients with MM has been defined. The feasibility of its implementation in routine practice will be assessed in a future pilot study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58554452018-03-19 Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project Blade, Joan Calleja, Miguel Ángel Lahuerta, Juan José Poveda, José Luis de Paz, Héctor David Lizán, Luis BMJ Open Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) OBJECTIVE: To define a standard set of outcomes and the most appropriate instruments to measure them for managing newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A literature review and five discussion groups facilitated the design of two-round Delphi questionnaire. Delphi panellists (haematologists, hospital pharmacists and patients) were identified by the scientific committee, the Spanish Program of Haematology Treatments Foundation, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacies and the Spanish Community of Patients with MM. Panellist’s perception about outcomes’ suitability and feasibility of use was assessed on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached when at least 75% of the respondents reached agreement or disagreement. A scientific committee led the project. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 45 panellists participated in the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Consensus was reached to use overall survival, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease and treatment response to assess survival and disease control. Panellists agreed to measure health-related quality of life, pain, performance status, fatigue, psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image, sexuality and preferences/satisfaction. However, panellist did not reach consensus about the feasibility of assessing in routine practice psychosocial status, symptoms, self-perception on body image and sexuality. Consensus was reached to collect patient-reported outcomes through the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core questionnaire 30 (C30), three items from EORTC-QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) and EORTC-QLQ-Breast Cancer (BR23), pain Visual Analogue Scale, Morisky-Green and ad hoc questions about patients’ preferences/satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: A consensual standard set of outcomes for managing newly diagnosed patients with MM has been defined. The feasibility of its implementation in routine practice will be assessed in a future pilot study. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5855445/ /pubmed/29472263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
Blade, Joan
Calleja, Miguel Ángel
Lahuerta, Juan José
Poveda, José Luis
de Paz, Héctor David
Lizán, Luis
Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title_full Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title_fullStr Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title_full_unstemmed Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title_short Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project
title_sort defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the delphi consensus method: the importa project
topic Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850
work_keys_str_mv AT bladejoan definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject
AT callejamiguelangel definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject
AT lahuertajuanjose definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject
AT povedajoseluis definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject
AT depazhectordavid definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject
AT lizanluis definingasetofstandardisedoutcomemeasuresfornewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyelomausingthedelphiconsensusmethodtheimportaproject