Cargando…
SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058 |
_version_ | 1783307105185300480 |
---|---|
author | Goossens, Godelieve Alice Grumiaux, Niel Janssens, Christel Jérôme, Martine Fieuws, Steffen Moons, Philip Stas, Marguerite Maleux, Geert |
author_facet | Goossens, Godelieve Alice Grumiaux, Niel Janssens, Christel Jérôme, Martine Fieuws, Steffen Moons, Philip Stas, Marguerite Maleux, Geert |
author_sort | Goossens, Godelieve Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49). INTERVENTIONS: StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock). RESULTS: Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3 min (95% CI 6.4 min to 8.3 min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3 min (95% CI 3.8 min to 4.9 min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32). CONCLUSION: Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02311127; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5855473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58554732018-03-19 SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial Goossens, Godelieve Alice Grumiaux, Niel Janssens, Christel Jérôme, Martine Fieuws, Steffen Moons, Philip Stas, Marguerite Maleux, Geert BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49). INTERVENTIONS: StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock). RESULTS: Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3 min (95% CI 6.4 min to 8.3 min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3 min (95% CI 3.8 min to 4.9 min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32). CONCLUSION: Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02311127; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5855473/ /pubmed/29478011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Goossens, Godelieve Alice Grumiaux, Niel Janssens, Christel Jérôme, Martine Fieuws, Steffen Moons, Philip Stas, Marguerite Maleux, Geert SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title | SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title_full | SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title_fullStr | SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title_full_unstemmed | SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title_short | SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
title_sort | securastap trial: securement with securacath versus statlock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goossensgodelievealice securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT grumiauxniel securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT janssenschristel securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT jeromemartine securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT fieuwssteffen securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT moonsphilip securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT stasmarguerite securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial AT maleuxgeert securastaptrialsecurementwithsecuracathversusstatlockforperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersarandomisedopentrial |