Cargando…

Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response

The rapid development and application of nanotechnology to biological interfaces has impacted the bone implant field, allowing researchers to finely modulate the interface between biomaterials and recipient tissues. In the present study, oxidative anodization was exploited to generate two alumina su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mussano, Federico, Genova, Tullio, Serra, Francesca Giulia, Carossa, Massimo, Munaron, Luca, Carossa, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29425177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020528
_version_ 1783307170018754560
author Mussano, Federico
Genova, Tullio
Serra, Francesca Giulia
Carossa, Massimo
Munaron, Luca
Carossa, Stefano
author_facet Mussano, Federico
Genova, Tullio
Serra, Francesca Giulia
Carossa, Massimo
Munaron, Luca
Carossa, Stefano
author_sort Mussano, Federico
collection PubMed
description The rapid development and application of nanotechnology to biological interfaces has impacted the bone implant field, allowing researchers to finely modulate the interface between biomaterials and recipient tissues. In the present study, oxidative anodization was exploited to generate two alumina surfaces with different pore diameters. The former displayed surface pores in the mean range of 16–30 nm, while in the latter pores varied from to 65 to 89 nm. The samples were characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis prior to being tested with pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. In vitro cell response was studied in terms of early cell adhesion, viability, and morphology, including focal adhesion quantification. Both the alumina samples promoted higher cell adhesion and viability than the control condition represented by the standard culture dish plastic. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed through alkaline phosphatase activity and extracellular calcium deposition, and it was found that of the two nano-surfaces, one was more efficient than the other. By comparing for the first time two nano-porous alumina surfaces with different pore diameters, our data supported the role of nano-topography in inducing cell response. Modulating a simple aspect of surface texture may become an attractive route for guiding bone healing and regeneration around implantable metals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5855750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58557502018-03-20 Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response Mussano, Federico Genova, Tullio Serra, Francesca Giulia Carossa, Massimo Munaron, Luca Carossa, Stefano Int J Mol Sci Article The rapid development and application of nanotechnology to biological interfaces has impacted the bone implant field, allowing researchers to finely modulate the interface between biomaterials and recipient tissues. In the present study, oxidative anodization was exploited to generate two alumina surfaces with different pore diameters. The former displayed surface pores in the mean range of 16–30 nm, while in the latter pores varied from to 65 to 89 nm. The samples were characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis prior to being tested with pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. In vitro cell response was studied in terms of early cell adhesion, viability, and morphology, including focal adhesion quantification. Both the alumina samples promoted higher cell adhesion and viability than the control condition represented by the standard culture dish plastic. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed through alkaline phosphatase activity and extracellular calcium deposition, and it was found that of the two nano-surfaces, one was more efficient than the other. By comparing for the first time two nano-porous alumina surfaces with different pore diameters, our data supported the role of nano-topography in inducing cell response. Modulating a simple aspect of surface texture may become an attractive route for guiding bone healing and regeneration around implantable metals. MDPI 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5855750/ /pubmed/29425177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020528 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mussano, Federico
Genova, Tullio
Serra, Francesca Giulia
Carossa, Massimo
Munaron, Luca
Carossa, Stefano
Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title_full Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title_fullStr Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title_full_unstemmed Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title_short Nano-Pore Size of Alumina Affects Osteoblastic Response
title_sort nano-pore size of alumina affects osteoblastic response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5855750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29425177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020528
work_keys_str_mv AT mussanofederico nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse
AT genovatullio nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse
AT serrafrancescagiulia nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse
AT carossamassimo nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse
AT munaronluca nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse
AT carossastefano nanoporesizeofaluminaaffectsosteoblasticresponse