Cargando…

Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently search the Internet for treatment options, and hospital websites are seen as reliable sources of knowledge. Guidelines support the use of proton radiotherapy in specific disease sites or on clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate direct-to-consumer adverti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corkum, Mark T., Liu, Wei, Palma, David A., Bauman, Glenn S., Dinniwell, Robert E., Warner, Andrew, Mishra, Mark V., Louie, Alexander V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29544511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0988-z
_version_ 1783307269647106048
author Corkum, Mark T.
Liu, Wei
Palma, David A.
Bauman, Glenn S.
Dinniwell, Robert E.
Warner, Andrew
Mishra, Mark V.
Louie, Alexander V.
author_facet Corkum, Mark T.
Liu, Wei
Palma, David A.
Bauman, Glenn S.
Dinniwell, Robert E.
Warner, Andrew
Mishra, Mark V.
Louie, Alexander V.
author_sort Corkum, Mark T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently search the Internet for treatment options, and hospital websites are seen as reliable sources of knowledge. Guidelines support the use of proton radiotherapy in specific disease sites or on clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate direct-to-consumer advertising content and claims made by proton therapy centre (PTC) websites worldwide. METHODS: Operational PTC websites in English were identified through the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group website. Data abstraction of website content was performed independently by two investigators. Eight international guidelines were consulted to determine guideline-based indications for proton radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the characteristics of PTC websites that indicated proton radiotherapy offered greater disease control or cure rates. RESULTS: Forty-eight PTCs with 46 English websites were identified. 60·9% of PTC websites claimed proton therapy provided improved disease control or cure. U.S. websites listed more indications than international websites (15·5 ± 5·4 vs. 10·4 ± 5·8, p = 0·004). The most common disease sites advertised were prostate (87·0%), head and neck (87·0%) and pediatrics (82·6%), all of which were indicated in least one international guideline. Several disease sites advertised were not present in any consensus guidelines, including pancreatobiliary (52·2%), breast (50·0%), and esophageal (43·5%) cancers. Multivariate analysis found increasing number of disease sites and claiming their centre was a local or regional leader in proton radiotherapy was associated with indicating proton radiotherapy offers greater disease control or cure. CONCLUSIONS: Information from PTC websites often differs from recommendations found in international consensus guidelines. As online marketing information may have significant influence on patient decision-making, alignment of such information with accepted guidelines and consensus opinion should be adopted by PTC providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0988-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5856220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58562202018-03-22 Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based? Corkum, Mark T. Liu, Wei Palma, David A. Bauman, Glenn S. Dinniwell, Robert E. Warner, Andrew Mishra, Mark V. Louie, Alexander V. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently search the Internet for treatment options, and hospital websites are seen as reliable sources of knowledge. Guidelines support the use of proton radiotherapy in specific disease sites or on clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate direct-to-consumer advertising content and claims made by proton therapy centre (PTC) websites worldwide. METHODS: Operational PTC websites in English were identified through the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group website. Data abstraction of website content was performed independently by two investigators. Eight international guidelines were consulted to determine guideline-based indications for proton radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the characteristics of PTC websites that indicated proton radiotherapy offered greater disease control or cure rates. RESULTS: Forty-eight PTCs with 46 English websites were identified. 60·9% of PTC websites claimed proton therapy provided improved disease control or cure. U.S. websites listed more indications than international websites (15·5 ± 5·4 vs. 10·4 ± 5·8, p = 0·004). The most common disease sites advertised were prostate (87·0%), head and neck (87·0%) and pediatrics (82·6%), all of which were indicated in least one international guideline. Several disease sites advertised were not present in any consensus guidelines, including pancreatobiliary (52·2%), breast (50·0%), and esophageal (43·5%) cancers. Multivariate analysis found increasing number of disease sites and claiming their centre was a local or regional leader in proton radiotherapy was associated with indicating proton radiotherapy offers greater disease control or cure. CONCLUSIONS: Information from PTC websites often differs from recommendations found in international consensus guidelines. As online marketing information may have significant influence on patient decision-making, alignment of such information with accepted guidelines and consensus opinion should be adopted by PTC providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0988-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5856220/ /pubmed/29544511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0988-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Corkum, Mark T.
Liu, Wei
Palma, David A.
Bauman, Glenn S.
Dinniwell, Robert E.
Warner, Andrew
Mishra, Mark V.
Louie, Alexander V.
Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title_full Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title_fullStr Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title_full_unstemmed Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title_short Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
title_sort online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29544511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0988-z
work_keys_str_mv AT corkummarkt onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT liuwei onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT palmadavida onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT baumanglenns onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT dinniwellroberte onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT warnerandrew onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT mishramarkv onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased
AT louiealexanderv onlineadvertisingandmarketingclaimsbyprovidersofprotonbeamtherapyaretheyguidelinebased