Cargando…

Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Although randomized controlled trials have confirmed oral tranexamic acid (TXA) can provide similar blood-sparing efficacy compared with intravenous (IV) TXA in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), some concerns do remain about thromboembolic events after such systemic administration. Many stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Duan, Zhu, Hui, Meng, Wei-Kun, Wang, Hao-Yang, Luo, Ze-Yu, Pei, Fu-Xing, Li, Qi, Zhou, Zong-Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29544472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1996-8
_version_ 1783307300066295808
author Wang, Duan
Zhu, Hui
Meng, Wei-Kun
Wang, Hao-Yang
Luo, Ze-Yu
Pei, Fu-Xing
Li, Qi
Zhou, Zong-Ke
author_facet Wang, Duan
Zhu, Hui
Meng, Wei-Kun
Wang, Hao-Yang
Luo, Ze-Yu
Pei, Fu-Xing
Li, Qi
Zhou, Zong-Ke
author_sort Wang, Duan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although randomized controlled trials have confirmed oral tranexamic acid (TXA) can provide similar blood-sparing efficacy compared with intravenous (IV) TXA in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), some concerns do remain about thromboembolic events after such systemic administration. Many studies have confirmed that intra-articular (IA) application of TXA can show similar blood-saving efficacy with minimal levels of systemic absorption compared with IV TXA. However, it remains unclear whether the efficacy and safety of oral TXA administration is equal to or less than that of IA administration in TKA without the use of a tourniquet and drain. Thus, this study was to verify non-inferior efficacy and safety of oral TXA compared with IA TXA in primary TKA. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare three oral doses of TXA (2 g of TXA 2 h before incision, and 1 g of TXA 6 and 12 h after surgery, respectively) with IA TXA (3 g of TXA in 100 mL of saline solution). One hundred forty-seven patients scheduled for TKA were randomized to one of the two interventions. The primary outcome was total blood loss. The secondary outcomes included reduction of hemoglobin concentration, clinical outcomes, blood coagulation values, thromboembolic complications, and transfusion rates. RESULTS: The mean total blood loss was 788.8 mL in the oral TXA group compared with 872.4 mL in the IA TXA group, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in reduction of hemoglobin level, blood coagulation level, and clinical outcomes. The transfusion rates were 4% in oral group and 5% IA group, respectively. Also, no significant differences were identified in thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: Oral TXA according to the described protocol demonstrated non-inferiority for primary TKA, with no safety concerns and a greatly reduced cost, compared with the IA TXA. This randomized controlled trial supports the oral administration of TXA in TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17010968) dated 23rd March 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5856392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58563922018-03-22 Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial Wang, Duan Zhu, Hui Meng, Wei-Kun Wang, Hao-Yang Luo, Ze-Yu Pei, Fu-Xing Li, Qi Zhou, Zong-Ke BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although randomized controlled trials have confirmed oral tranexamic acid (TXA) can provide similar blood-sparing efficacy compared with intravenous (IV) TXA in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), some concerns do remain about thromboembolic events after such systemic administration. Many studies have confirmed that intra-articular (IA) application of TXA can show similar blood-saving efficacy with minimal levels of systemic absorption compared with IV TXA. However, it remains unclear whether the efficacy and safety of oral TXA administration is equal to or less than that of IA administration in TKA without the use of a tourniquet and drain. Thus, this study was to verify non-inferior efficacy and safety of oral TXA compared with IA TXA in primary TKA. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare three oral doses of TXA (2 g of TXA 2 h before incision, and 1 g of TXA 6 and 12 h after surgery, respectively) with IA TXA (3 g of TXA in 100 mL of saline solution). One hundred forty-seven patients scheduled for TKA were randomized to one of the two interventions. The primary outcome was total blood loss. The secondary outcomes included reduction of hemoglobin concentration, clinical outcomes, blood coagulation values, thromboembolic complications, and transfusion rates. RESULTS: The mean total blood loss was 788.8 mL in the oral TXA group compared with 872.4 mL in the IA TXA group, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in reduction of hemoglobin level, blood coagulation level, and clinical outcomes. The transfusion rates were 4% in oral group and 5% IA group, respectively. Also, no significant differences were identified in thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: Oral TXA according to the described protocol demonstrated non-inferiority for primary TKA, with no safety concerns and a greatly reduced cost, compared with the IA TXA. This randomized controlled trial supports the oral administration of TXA in TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17010968) dated 23rd March 2017. BioMed Central 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5856392/ /pubmed/29544472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1996-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Duan
Zhu, Hui
Meng, Wei-Kun
Wang, Hao-Yang
Luo, Ze-Yu
Pei, Fu-Xing
Li, Qi
Zhou, Zong-Ke
Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of oral versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet application: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29544472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1996-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wangduan comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuhui comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mengweikun comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wanghaoyang comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luozeyu comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peifuxing comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liqi comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouzongke comparisonoforalversusintraarticulartranexamicacidinenhancedrecoveryprimarytotalkneearthroplastywithouttourniquetapplicationarandomizedcontrolledtrial