Cargando…

Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants

Background and Objectives Intra-parenchymal brain surgical resection cavities usually contract in volume following low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy implants. In this study, we systematically modeled and assessed dose variability resulting from such changes for I-125 versus Cs-131 radioactive source...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Dae Y, Ma, Lijun, Braunstein, Steve, Raleigh, David, Sneed, Patricia K, McDermott, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560292
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2079
_version_ 1783307304579366912
author Han, Dae Y
Ma, Lijun
Braunstein, Steve
Raleigh, David
Sneed, Patricia K
McDermott, Michael
author_facet Han, Dae Y
Ma, Lijun
Braunstein, Steve
Raleigh, David
Sneed, Patricia K
McDermott, Michael
author_sort Han, Dae Y
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives Intra-parenchymal brain surgical resection cavities usually contract in volume following low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy implants. In this study, we systematically modeled and assessed dose variability resulting from such changes for I-125 versus Cs-131 radioactive sources. Methods Resection cavity contraction was modeled based on 95 consecutive patient cases, using surveillance magnetic resonance (MR) images. The model was derived for single point source geometry and then fully simulated in 3D where I-125 or Cs-131 seeds were placed on the surface of an ellipsoidal resection cavity. Dose distribution estimated via TG-43 calculations and biological effective dose (BED) calculations were compared for both I-125 and Cs-131, accounting for resection cavity contractions. Results Resection cavity volumes were found to contract with an effective half-life of approximately 3.4 months (time to reach 50% of maximum volume contraction). As a result, significant differences in dose distributions were noted between I-125 and Cs-131 radioactive sources. For example, when comparing with static volume, assuming no contraction effect, I-125 exhibited a 31.8% and 30.5% increase in D90 and D10 values (i.e., the minimal dose to 90% and 10% of the volume respectively) in the peripheral target areas over the follow-up period of 20.5 months. In contrast, Cs-131 seeds only exhibited a 1.44% and 0.64% increase in D90 and D10 values respectively. Such discrepancy is likewise similar for BED calculations. Conclusion Resection cavity contractions affects Cs-131 dose distribution significantly less than that of I-125 for permanent brain implants. Care must be taken to account for cavity contractions when prescribing accumulative doses of a radioactive source in performing the brain implant procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5856410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58564102018-03-20 Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants Han, Dae Y Ma, Lijun Braunstein, Steve Raleigh, David Sneed, Patricia K McDermott, Michael Cureus Medical Physics Background and Objectives Intra-parenchymal brain surgical resection cavities usually contract in volume following low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy implants. In this study, we systematically modeled and assessed dose variability resulting from such changes for I-125 versus Cs-131 radioactive sources. Methods Resection cavity contraction was modeled based on 95 consecutive patient cases, using surveillance magnetic resonance (MR) images. The model was derived for single point source geometry and then fully simulated in 3D where I-125 or Cs-131 seeds were placed on the surface of an ellipsoidal resection cavity. Dose distribution estimated via TG-43 calculations and biological effective dose (BED) calculations were compared for both I-125 and Cs-131, accounting for resection cavity contractions. Results Resection cavity volumes were found to contract with an effective half-life of approximately 3.4 months (time to reach 50% of maximum volume contraction). As a result, significant differences in dose distributions were noted between I-125 and Cs-131 radioactive sources. For example, when comparing with static volume, assuming no contraction effect, I-125 exhibited a 31.8% and 30.5% increase in D90 and D10 values (i.e., the minimal dose to 90% and 10% of the volume respectively) in the peripheral target areas over the follow-up period of 20.5 months. In contrast, Cs-131 seeds only exhibited a 1.44% and 0.64% increase in D90 and D10 values respectively. Such discrepancy is likewise similar for BED calculations. Conclusion Resection cavity contractions affects Cs-131 dose distribution significantly less than that of I-125 for permanent brain implants. Care must be taken to account for cavity contractions when prescribing accumulative doses of a radioactive source in performing the brain implant procedures. Cureus 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5856410/ /pubmed/29560292 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2079 Text en Copyright © 2018, Han et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Physics
Han, Dae Y
Ma, Lijun
Braunstein, Steve
Raleigh, David
Sneed, Patricia K
McDermott, Michael
Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title_full Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title_fullStr Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title_full_unstemmed Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title_short Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants
title_sort resection cavity contraction effects in the use of radioactive sources (1-25 versus cs-131) for intra-operative brain implants
topic Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560292
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2079
work_keys_str_mv AT handaey resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants
AT malijun resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants
AT braunsteinsteve resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants
AT raleighdavid resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants
AT sneedpatriciak resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants
AT mcdermottmichael resectioncavitycontractioneffectsintheuseofradioactivesources125versuscs131forintraoperativebrainimplants