Cargando…
Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643878 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990 |
_version_ | 1783307395780313088 |
---|---|
author | Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan Tas, Emre Erdem Yavuz, Ayse Filiz |
author_facet | Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan Tas, Emre Erdem Yavuz, Ayse Filiz |
author_sort | Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. After patients with endometrial hyperplasia/neoplasia were included in Group-I, and those with insufficient tissue, endometrial atrophy, or endometritis were included in Group-II; Groups one and two were compared with respect to primary (correlations between endometrial thickness and EFC volume) and secondary (correlations between demographic characteristics and EFC volume) outcomes. RESULTS: There was no correlation between EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness (P = 0.36). Likewise, demographic characteristics were not related to EFC (P > 0.05). However, both EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness were thicker in Group-I compared to Group-II (4.8 ± 1.9 mm vs. 3.7 ± 2.5 mm; and 5.7 ± 9.4 mm vs. 2.7 ± 2.5 mm, respectively) (P values were < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a cutoff value for endometrial thickness and EFC volume could not be recommended based on our study findings, it should be noted that 2% is a clinically significant rate of malignancy. Thus, postmenopausal patients with EFC should be evaluated for endometrial sampling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58570292018-04-11 Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan Tas, Emre Erdem Yavuz, Ayse Filiz Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. After patients with endometrial hyperplasia/neoplasia were included in Group-I, and those with insufficient tissue, endometrial atrophy, or endometritis were included in Group-II; Groups one and two were compared with respect to primary (correlations between endometrial thickness and EFC volume) and secondary (correlations between demographic characteristics and EFC volume) outcomes. RESULTS: There was no correlation between EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness (P = 0.36). Likewise, demographic characteristics were not related to EFC (P > 0.05). However, both EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness were thicker in Group-I compared to Group-II (4.8 ± 1.9 mm vs. 3.7 ± 2.5 mm; and 5.7 ± 9.4 mm vs. 2.7 ± 2.5 mm, respectively) (P values were < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a cutoff value for endometrial thickness and EFC volume could not be recommended based on our study findings, it should be noted that 2% is a clinically significant rate of malignancy. Thus, postmenopausal patients with EFC should be evaluated for endometrial sampling. Professional Medical Publications 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5857029/ /pubmed/29643878 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan Tas, Emre Erdem Yavuz, Ayse Filiz Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title | Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title_full | Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title_fullStr | Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title_short | Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
title_sort | is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643878 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeginakcaygulinfeykan ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer AT tasemreerdem ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer AT yavuzaysefiliz ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer |