Cargando…

Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan, Tas, Emre Erdem, Yavuz, Ayse Filiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643878
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990
_version_ 1783307395780313088
author Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan
Tas, Emre Erdem
Yavuz, Ayse Filiz
author_facet Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan
Tas, Emre Erdem
Yavuz, Ayse Filiz
author_sort Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. After patients with endometrial hyperplasia/neoplasia were included in Group-I, and those with insufficient tissue, endometrial atrophy, or endometritis were included in Group-II; Groups one and two were compared with respect to primary (correlations between endometrial thickness and EFC volume) and secondary (correlations between demographic characteristics and EFC volume) outcomes. RESULTS: There was no correlation between EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness (P = 0.36). Likewise, demographic characteristics were not related to EFC (P > 0.05). However, both EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness were thicker in Group-I compared to Group-II (4.8 ± 1.9 mm vs. 3.7 ± 2.5 mm; and 5.7 ± 9.4 mm vs. 2.7 ± 2.5 mm, respectively) (P values were < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a cutoff value for endometrial thickness and EFC volume could not be recommended based on our study findings, it should be noted that 2% is a clinically significant rate of malignancy. Thus, postmenopausal patients with EFC should be evaluated for endometrial sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58570292018-04-11 Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer? Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan Tas, Emre Erdem Yavuz, Ayse Filiz Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of single-layer, ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial fluid collection (EFC) volume to predict endometrial pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic postmenopausal women were analysed retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. After patients with endometrial hyperplasia/neoplasia were included in Group-I, and those with insufficient tissue, endometrial atrophy, or endometritis were included in Group-II; Groups one and two were compared with respect to primary (correlations between endometrial thickness and EFC volume) and secondary (correlations between demographic characteristics and EFC volume) outcomes. RESULTS: There was no correlation between EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness (P = 0.36). Likewise, demographic characteristics were not related to EFC (P > 0.05). However, both EFC volume and single-layer endometrial thickness were thicker in Group-I compared to Group-II (4.8 ± 1.9 mm vs. 3.7 ± 2.5 mm; and 5.7 ± 9.4 mm vs. 2.7 ± 2.5 mm, respectively) (P values were < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a cutoff value for endometrial thickness and EFC volume could not be recommended based on our study findings, it should be noted that 2% is a clinically significant rate of malignancy. Thus, postmenopausal patients with EFC should be evaluated for endometrial sampling. Professional Medical Publications 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5857029/ /pubmed/29643878 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yegin Akcay, Gulin Feykan
Tas, Emre Erdem
Yavuz, Ayse Filiz
Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title_full Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title_fullStr Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title_short Is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
title_sort is postmenopausal endometrial fluid collection alone a risk factor for endometrial cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643878
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13990
work_keys_str_mv AT yeginakcaygulinfeykan ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer
AT tasemreerdem ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer
AT yavuzaysefiliz ispostmenopausalendometrialfluidcollectionaloneariskfactorforendometrialcancer