Cargando…
Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: Some authors have hypothesized that Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression (TRD-UP) should be considered within the bipolar spectrum disorders and that hidden bipolarity may be a risk factor for TRD-UP. However, there are neither studies comparing clinical and sociodemographic data of p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29548306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1641-y |
_version_ | 1783307419631222784 |
---|---|
author | Nuñez, Nicolas A. Comai, Stefano Dumitrescu, Eduard Ghabrash, Maykel F. Tabaka, John Saint-Laurent, Marie Vida, Stephen Kolivakis, Theodore Fielding, Allan Low, Nancy Cervantes, Pablo Booij, Linda Gobbi, Gabriella |
author_facet | Nuñez, Nicolas A. Comai, Stefano Dumitrescu, Eduard Ghabrash, Maykel F. Tabaka, John Saint-Laurent, Marie Vida, Stephen Kolivakis, Theodore Fielding, Allan Low, Nancy Cervantes, Pablo Booij, Linda Gobbi, Gabriella |
author_sort | Nuñez, Nicolas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some authors have hypothesized that Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression (TRD-UP) should be considered within the bipolar spectrum disorders and that hidden bipolarity may be a risk factor for TRD-UP. However, there are neither studies comparing clinical and sociodemographic data of patients with TRD-UP versus Bipolar (BP) disorders nor are there any examining differences versus Bipolar type I (BP-I) and Bipolar type II (BP-II). METHODS: Charts analysis was conducted on 194 patients followed at the Mood Disorders Clinic of the McGill University Health Center. Sociodemographic, clinical features and depression scales were collected from patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for TRD-UP (n = 100) and BP (n = 94). Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine clinical predictors independently associated with the two disorders. RESULTS: Compared to BP, TRD-UP patients exhibited greater severity of depression, prevalence of anxiety and panic disorders, melancholic features, Cluster-C personality disorders, later onset of depression and fewer hospitalizations. Binary logistic regression indicated that higher comorbidity with anxiety disorders, higher depression scale scores and lower global assessment of functioning (GAF) scores, and lower number of hospitalizations and psychotherapies differentiated TRD-UP from BP patients. We also found that the rate of unemployment and the number of hospitalizations for depression was higher in BP-I than in BP-II, while the rate of suicide attempts was lower in BP-I than in BP-II depressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TRD-UP constitutes a distinct psychopathological condition and not necessarily a prodromal state of BP depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58571322018-03-22 Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study Nuñez, Nicolas A. Comai, Stefano Dumitrescu, Eduard Ghabrash, Maykel F. Tabaka, John Saint-Laurent, Marie Vida, Stephen Kolivakis, Theodore Fielding, Allan Low, Nancy Cervantes, Pablo Booij, Linda Gobbi, Gabriella BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Some authors have hypothesized that Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression (TRD-UP) should be considered within the bipolar spectrum disorders and that hidden bipolarity may be a risk factor for TRD-UP. However, there are neither studies comparing clinical and sociodemographic data of patients with TRD-UP versus Bipolar (BP) disorders nor are there any examining differences versus Bipolar type I (BP-I) and Bipolar type II (BP-II). METHODS: Charts analysis was conducted on 194 patients followed at the Mood Disorders Clinic of the McGill University Health Center. Sociodemographic, clinical features and depression scales were collected from patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for TRD-UP (n = 100) and BP (n = 94). Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine clinical predictors independently associated with the two disorders. RESULTS: Compared to BP, TRD-UP patients exhibited greater severity of depression, prevalence of anxiety and panic disorders, melancholic features, Cluster-C personality disorders, later onset of depression and fewer hospitalizations. Binary logistic regression indicated that higher comorbidity with anxiety disorders, higher depression scale scores and lower global assessment of functioning (GAF) scores, and lower number of hospitalizations and psychotherapies differentiated TRD-UP from BP patients. We also found that the rate of unemployment and the number of hospitalizations for depression was higher in BP-I than in BP-II, while the rate of suicide attempts was lower in BP-I than in BP-II depressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TRD-UP constitutes a distinct psychopathological condition and not necessarily a prodromal state of BP depression. BioMed Central 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5857132/ /pubmed/29548306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1641-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nuñez, Nicolas A. Comai, Stefano Dumitrescu, Eduard Ghabrash, Maykel F. Tabaka, John Saint-Laurent, Marie Vida, Stephen Kolivakis, Theodore Fielding, Allan Low, Nancy Cervantes, Pablo Booij, Linda Gobbi, Gabriella Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title | Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title_full | Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title_short | Psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
title_sort | psychopathological and sociodemographic features in treatment-resistant unipolar depression versus bipolar depression: a comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29548306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1641-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nuneznicolasa psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT comaistefano psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT dumitrescueduard psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT ghabrashmaykelf psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT tabakajohn psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT saintlaurentmarie psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT vidastephen psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT kolivakistheodore psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT fieldingallan psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT lownancy psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT cervantespablo psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT booijlinda psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy AT gobbigabriella psychopathologicalandsociodemographicfeaturesintreatmentresistantunipolardepressionversusbipolardepressionacomparativestudy |