Cargando…

How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging

Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jae W., Gruber, Gerlinde M., Patsch, Janina M., Seidl, Rainer, Prayer, Daniela, Kasprian, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y
_version_ 1783307439617081344
author Song, Jae W.
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Patsch, Janina M.
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
Kasprian, Gregor
author_facet Song, Jae W.
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Patsch, Janina M.
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
Kasprian, Gregor
author_sort Song, Jae W.
collection PubMed
description Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts derived from fetal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data are accurate and predictive of the integrity of these tracts postnatally. We compared callosal and corticospinal tracts of 12 subjects with paired prenatal (age: 23–35 gestational weeks) and postnatal (age: 1 day to 2 years) DTI examinations (b values of 0 s/mm(2) and 700 s/mm(2), 16 gradient encoding directions) using deterministic tractography. Evaluation for the presence of callosal segments and corticospinal tracts showed moderate degrees of accuracy (67–75%) for the four segments of the corpus callosum and moderate to high degrees of accuracy (75–92%) for the corticospinal tracts. Positive predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 50% to 100% and for the corticospinal tracts, 89% to 100%. Negative predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 25% to 80% and for the corticospinal tracts, 33% to 50%. The results suggest that when the tracts are not well characterized on the fetal MR, predictions about the postnatal tracts are difficult to make. However, accounting for brain maturation, prenatal visualization of the main projection and commissural tracts can be clinically used as an important predictive tool in the context of image interpretation for the assessment of fetal brain malformations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58572762018-03-21 How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging Song, Jae W. Gruber, Gerlinde M. Patsch, Janina M. Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela Kasprian, Gregor Pediatr Radiol Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts derived from fetal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data are accurate and predictive of the integrity of these tracts postnatally. We compared callosal and corticospinal tracts of 12 subjects with paired prenatal (age: 23–35 gestational weeks) and postnatal (age: 1 day to 2 years) DTI examinations (b values of 0 s/mm(2) and 700 s/mm(2), 16 gradient encoding directions) using deterministic tractography. Evaluation for the presence of callosal segments and corticospinal tracts showed moderate degrees of accuracy (67–75%) for the four segments of the corpus callosum and moderate to high degrees of accuracy (75–92%) for the corticospinal tracts. Positive predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 50% to 100% and for the corticospinal tracts, 89% to 100%. Negative predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 25% to 80% and for the corticospinal tracts, 33% to 50%. The results suggest that when the tracts are not well characterized on the fetal MR, predictions about the postnatal tracts are difficult to make. However, accounting for brain maturation, prenatal visualization of the main projection and commissural tracts can be clinically used as an important predictive tool in the context of image interpretation for the assessment of fetal brain malformations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5857276/ /pubmed/29550863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging
Song, Jae W.
Gruber, Gerlinde M.
Patsch, Janina M.
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
Kasprian, Gregor
How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title_full How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title_fullStr How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title_full_unstemmed How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title_short How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
title_sort how accurate are prenatal tractography results? a postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
topic Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y
work_keys_str_mv AT songjaew howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging
AT grubergerlindem howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging
AT patschjaninam howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging
AT seidlrainer howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging
AT prayerdaniela howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging
AT kaspriangregor howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging