Cargando…
How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging
Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y |
_version_ | 1783307439617081344 |
---|---|
author | Song, Jae W. Gruber, Gerlinde M. Patsch, Janina M. Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela Kasprian, Gregor |
author_facet | Song, Jae W. Gruber, Gerlinde M. Patsch, Janina M. Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela Kasprian, Gregor |
author_sort | Song, Jae W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts derived from fetal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data are accurate and predictive of the integrity of these tracts postnatally. We compared callosal and corticospinal tracts of 12 subjects with paired prenatal (age: 23–35 gestational weeks) and postnatal (age: 1 day to 2 years) DTI examinations (b values of 0 s/mm(2) and 700 s/mm(2), 16 gradient encoding directions) using deterministic tractography. Evaluation for the presence of callosal segments and corticospinal tracts showed moderate degrees of accuracy (67–75%) for the four segments of the corpus callosum and moderate to high degrees of accuracy (75–92%) for the corticospinal tracts. Positive predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 50% to 100% and for the corticospinal tracts, 89% to 100%. Negative predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 25% to 80% and for the corticospinal tracts, 33% to 50%. The results suggest that when the tracts are not well characterized on the fetal MR, predictions about the postnatal tracts are difficult to make. However, accounting for brain maturation, prenatal visualization of the main projection and commissural tracts can be clinically used as an important predictive tool in the context of image interpretation for the assessment of fetal brain malformations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58572762018-03-21 How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging Song, Jae W. Gruber, Gerlinde M. Patsch, Janina M. Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela Kasprian, Gregor Pediatr Radiol Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts derived from fetal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data are accurate and predictive of the integrity of these tracts postnatally. We compared callosal and corticospinal tracts of 12 subjects with paired prenatal (age: 23–35 gestational weeks) and postnatal (age: 1 day to 2 years) DTI examinations (b values of 0 s/mm(2) and 700 s/mm(2), 16 gradient encoding directions) using deterministic tractography. Evaluation for the presence of callosal segments and corticospinal tracts showed moderate degrees of accuracy (67–75%) for the four segments of the corpus callosum and moderate to high degrees of accuracy (75–92%) for the corticospinal tracts. Positive predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 50% to 100% and for the corticospinal tracts, 89% to 100%. Negative predictive values for segments of the corpus callosum ranged from 25% to 80% and for the corticospinal tracts, 33% to 50%. The results suggest that when the tracts are not well characterized on the fetal MR, predictions about the postnatal tracts are difficult to make. However, accounting for brain maturation, prenatal visualization of the main projection and commissural tracts can be clinically used as an important predictive tool in the context of image interpretation for the assessment of fetal brain malformations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5857276/ /pubmed/29550863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging Song, Jae W. Gruber, Gerlinde M. Patsch, Janina M. Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela Kasprian, Gregor How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title | How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title_full | How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title_fullStr | How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title_short | How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
title_sort | how accurate are prenatal tractography results? a postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging |
topic | Minisymposium: Fetal/neonatal imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3982-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songjaew howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging AT grubergerlindem howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging AT patschjaninam howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging AT seidlrainer howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging AT prayerdaniela howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging AT kaspriangregor howaccurateareprenataltractographyresultsapostnatalinvivofollowupstudyusingdiffusiontensorimaging |