Cargando…
Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pathological complete response is seen in approximately one fifth of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Since these patients have excellent oncological outcomes, there has been a rapidly growing interest in organ preservation for those who develop a clini...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5 |
_version_ | 1783307439857205248 |
---|---|
author | Bernier, Laurence Balyasnikova, Svetlana Tait, Diana Brown, Gina |
author_facet | Bernier, Laurence Balyasnikova, Svetlana Tait, Diana Brown, Gina |
author_sort | Bernier, Laurence |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pathological complete response is seen in approximately one fifth of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Since these patients have excellent oncological outcomes, there has been a rapidly growing interest in organ preservation for those who develop a clinical complete response. We review the watch-and-wait strategy and focus on all aspects of this hot topic, including who should be considered for this approach, how should we identify treatment response and what are the expected outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The major challenges in interpreting the data on watch-and-wait are the significant heterogeneity of patients selected for this approach and of methods employed to identify them. The evidence available comes mostly from retrospective cohort studies, but has shown good oncological outcomes, including the rate of successful salvage surgery, locoregional control and overall survival. SUMMARY: There is currently not enough and not robust enough evidence to support watch-and-wait as a standard approach, outside a clinical trial, for patients achieving clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on long-term outcomes. However, the results we have so far are promising, and there is therefore an urgent need for randomised control studies such as the TRIGGER trial to confirm the safety of this strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58572772018-03-21 Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer Bernier, Laurence Balyasnikova, Svetlana Tait, Diana Brown, Gina Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pathological complete response is seen in approximately one fifth of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Since these patients have excellent oncological outcomes, there has been a rapidly growing interest in organ preservation for those who develop a clinical complete response. We review the watch-and-wait strategy and focus on all aspects of this hot topic, including who should be considered for this approach, how should we identify treatment response and what are the expected outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The major challenges in interpreting the data on watch-and-wait are the significant heterogeneity of patients selected for this approach and of methods employed to identify them. The evidence available comes mostly from retrospective cohort studies, but has shown good oncological outcomes, including the rate of successful salvage surgery, locoregional control and overall survival. SUMMARY: There is currently not enough and not robust enough evidence to support watch-and-wait as a standard approach, outside a clinical trial, for patients achieving clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on long-term outcomes. However, the results we have so far are promising, and there is therefore an urgent need for randomised control studies such as the TRIGGER trial to confirm the safety of this strategy. Springer US 2018-03-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5857277/ /pubmed/29576755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors) Bernier, Laurence Balyasnikova, Svetlana Tait, Diana Brown, Gina Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title | Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title_full | Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title_short | Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer |
title_sort | watch-and-wait as a therapeutic strategy in rectal cancer |
topic | Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernierlaurence watchandwaitasatherapeuticstrategyinrectalcancer AT balyasnikovasvetlana watchandwaitasatherapeuticstrategyinrectalcancer AT taitdiana watchandwaitasatherapeuticstrategyinrectalcancer AT browngina watchandwaitasatherapeuticstrategyinrectalcancer |