Cargando…

Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study

[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aktürk, Semra, Kaya, Arzu, Çetintaş, Derya, Akgöl, Gürkan, Gülkesen, Arif, Kal, Gül Ayden, Güçer, Tülin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448
_version_ 1783307466390372352
author Aktürk, Semra
Kaya, Arzu
Çetintaş, Derya
Akgöl, Gürkan
Gülkesen, Arif
Kal, Gül Ayden
Güçer, Tülin
author_facet Aktürk, Semra
Kaya, Arzu
Çetintaş, Derya
Akgöl, Gürkan
Gülkesen, Arif
Kal, Gül Ayden
Güçer, Tülin
author_sort Aktürk, Semra
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58574562018-03-26 Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study Aktürk, Semra Kaya, Arzu Çetintaş, Derya Akgöl, Gürkan Gülkesen, Arif Kal, Gül Ayden Güçer, Tülin J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018-03-02 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5857456/ /pubmed/29581669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448 Text en 2018©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Aktürk, Semra
Kaya, Arzu
Çetintaş, Derya
Akgöl, Gürkan
Gülkesen, Arif
Kal, Gül Ayden
Güçer, Tülin
Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title_full Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title_fullStr Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title_short Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
title_sort comparision of the effectiveness of eswt and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448
work_keys_str_mv AT akturksemra comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT kayaarzu comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT cetintasderya comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT akgolgurkan comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT gulkesenarif comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT kalgulayden comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy
AT gucertulin comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy