Cargando…
Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448 |
_version_ | 1783307466390372352 |
---|---|
author | Aktürk, Semra Kaya, Arzu Çetintaş, Derya Akgöl, Gürkan Gülkesen, Arif Kal, Gül Ayden Güçer, Tülin |
author_facet | Aktürk, Semra Kaya, Arzu Çetintaş, Derya Akgöl, Gürkan Gülkesen, Arif Kal, Gül Ayden Güçer, Tülin |
author_sort | Aktürk, Semra |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58574562018-03-26 Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study Aktürk, Semra Kaya, Arzu Çetintaş, Derya Akgöl, Gürkan Gülkesen, Arif Kal, Gül Ayden Güçer, Tülin J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018-03-02 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5857456/ /pubmed/29581669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448 Text en 2018©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aktürk, Semra Kaya, Arzu Çetintaş, Derya Akgöl, Gürkan Gülkesen, Arif Kal, Gül Ayden Güçer, Tülin Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title | Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title_full | Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title_fullStr | Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title_short | Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
title_sort | comparision of the effectiveness of eswt and ultrasound treatments in
myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akturksemra comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT kayaarzu comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT cetintasderya comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT akgolgurkan comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT gulkesenarif comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT kalgulayden comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy AT gucertulin comparisionoftheeffectivenessofeswtandultrasoundtreatmentsinmyofascialpainsyndromerandomizedshamcontrolledstudy |