Cargando…
Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
OBJECTIVES: To determine the appropriateness of medical imaging examinations involving radiation and to estimate the effective radiation dose and costs associated. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: Two Spanish public tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 2022 medical imaging tests we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019535 |
_version_ | 1783307513651789824 |
---|---|
author | Vilar-Palop, Jorge Hernandez-Aguado, Ildefonso Pastor-Valero, María Vilar, José González-Alvarez, Isabel Lumbreras, Blanca |
author_facet | Vilar-Palop, Jorge Hernandez-Aguado, Ildefonso Pastor-Valero, María Vilar, José González-Alvarez, Isabel Lumbreras, Blanca |
author_sort | Vilar-Palop, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the appropriateness of medical imaging examinations involving radiation and to estimate the effective radiation dose and costs associated. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: Two Spanish public tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 2022 medical imaging tests were extracted from the radiology information system in February and March of 2014. MRI and ultrasound examinations were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Five outcomes were set independently by at least two researchers according to four guidelines: (1) appropriate; (2) inappropriate; (3) inappropriate due to repetition, if the timing to carry out next diagnostic tests was incorrect according to guidelines; (4) not adequately justified, if the referral form did not include enough clinical information to allow us to understand the patient’s clinical condition; and (5) not included in the guidelines, if the referral could not be matched to a clinical scenario described in the guidelines. We estimated the prevalence of the five categories according to relevant clinical and sociodemographic variables and the effective radiation dose and costs for each category. RESULTS: Approximately half of the imaging tests were deemed as appropriate (967, 47.8%) while one-third (634, 31.4%) were considered inappropriate. 19.6% of the effective dose and 25.2% of the cost were associated with inappropriate tests. Women were less likely than men to have an imaging test classified as appropriate (adjusted OR 0.70,95% CI 0.57 to 0.86). Imaging tests requested by general practitioners were less likely to be considered appropriate than those requested by central services (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93). Mammography and CT were more likely to be appropriate than conventional X-rays. CONCLUSION: There was a significant frequency of inappropriateness, which resulted in a high percentage of associated effective radiation dose. Percentage of inappropriateness depends on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics such as sex, age, referral physician and medical imaging test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58576812018-03-20 Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis Vilar-Palop, Jorge Hernandez-Aguado, Ildefonso Pastor-Valero, María Vilar, José González-Alvarez, Isabel Lumbreras, Blanca BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging OBJECTIVES: To determine the appropriateness of medical imaging examinations involving radiation and to estimate the effective radiation dose and costs associated. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: Two Spanish public tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 2022 medical imaging tests were extracted from the radiology information system in February and March of 2014. MRI and ultrasound examinations were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Five outcomes were set independently by at least two researchers according to four guidelines: (1) appropriate; (2) inappropriate; (3) inappropriate due to repetition, if the timing to carry out next diagnostic tests was incorrect according to guidelines; (4) not adequately justified, if the referral form did not include enough clinical information to allow us to understand the patient’s clinical condition; and (5) not included in the guidelines, if the referral could not be matched to a clinical scenario described in the guidelines. We estimated the prevalence of the five categories according to relevant clinical and sociodemographic variables and the effective radiation dose and costs for each category. RESULTS: Approximately half of the imaging tests were deemed as appropriate (967, 47.8%) while one-third (634, 31.4%) were considered inappropriate. 19.6% of the effective dose and 25.2% of the cost were associated with inappropriate tests. Women were less likely than men to have an imaging test classified as appropriate (adjusted OR 0.70,95% CI 0.57 to 0.86). Imaging tests requested by general practitioners were less likely to be considered appropriate than those requested by central services (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93). Mammography and CT were more likely to be appropriate than conventional X-rays. CONCLUSION: There was a significant frequency of inappropriateness, which resulted in a high percentage of associated effective radiation dose. Percentage of inappropriateness depends on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics such as sex, age, referral physician and medical imaging test. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5857681/ /pubmed/29549204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019535 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Vilar-Palop, Jorge Hernandez-Aguado, Ildefonso Pastor-Valero, María Vilar, José González-Alvarez, Isabel Lumbreras, Blanca Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title | Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | appropriate use of medical imaging in two spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vilarpalopjorge appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT hernandezaguadoildefonso appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT pastorvaleromaria appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT vilarjose appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT gonzalezalvarezisabel appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT lumbrerasblanca appropriateuseofmedicalimagingintwospanishpublichospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis |