Cargando…
A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063 |
_version_ | 1783307516256452608 |
---|---|
author | Crossan, Catriona Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay Williams, Hilarie Poulter, Neil Rodgers, Anthony Jan, Stephen Thom, Simon Lord, Joanne |
author_facet | Crossan, Catriona Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay Williams, Hilarie Poulter, Neil Rodgers, Anthony Jan, Stephen Thom, Simon Lord, Joanne |
author_sort | Crossan, Catriona |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk thereof. The aim of Researching the UMPIRE Processes for Economic Evaluation in the National Health Service (RUPEE NHS) is to estimate the potential health economic impact of a polypill strategy for CVD prevention within the NHS using UMPIRE trial and other relevant data. This paper describes the design of a modelled economic evaluation of the impact of increased adherence to the polypill versus usual care among the UK UMPIRE participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: As recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making modelling guidelines, a review of published CVD models was undertaken to identify the most appropriate modelling approach and structure. The review was carried out in the electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE. 40 CVD models were identified from 57 studies, the majority of economic models were health state transition cohort models and individual-level simulation models. The findings were discussed with clinical experts to confirm the approach and structure. An individual simulation approach was identified as the most suitable method to capture the heterogeneity in the population at CVD risk. RUPEE-NHS will use UMPIRE trial data on adherence to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the polypill strategy. DISSEMINATION: The evaluation findings will be presented in open-access scientific and healthcare policy journals and at national and international conferences. We will also present findings to NHS policy makers and pharmaceutical companies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58576922018-03-20 A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study Crossan, Catriona Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay Williams, Hilarie Poulter, Neil Rodgers, Anthony Jan, Stephen Thom, Simon Lord, Joanne BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk thereof. The aim of Researching the UMPIRE Processes for Economic Evaluation in the National Health Service (RUPEE NHS) is to estimate the potential health economic impact of a polypill strategy for CVD prevention within the NHS using UMPIRE trial and other relevant data. This paper describes the design of a modelled economic evaluation of the impact of increased adherence to the polypill versus usual care among the UK UMPIRE participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: As recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making modelling guidelines, a review of published CVD models was undertaken to identify the most appropriate modelling approach and structure. The review was carried out in the electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE. 40 CVD models were identified from 57 studies, the majority of economic models were health state transition cohort models and individual-level simulation models. The findings were discussed with clinical experts to confirm the approach and structure. An individual simulation approach was identified as the most suitable method to capture the heterogeneity in the population at CVD risk. RUPEE-NHS will use UMPIRE trial data on adherence to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the polypill strategy. DISSEMINATION: The evaluation findings will be presented in open-access scientific and healthcare policy journals and at national and international conferences. We will also present findings to NHS policy makers and pharmaceutical companies. BMJ Open 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5857692/ /pubmed/29540403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Crossan, Catriona Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay Williams, Hilarie Poulter, Neil Rodgers, Anthony Jan, Stephen Thom, Simon Lord, Joanne A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title | A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title_full | A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title_fullStr | A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title_short | A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study |
title_sort | protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a uk nhs setting: rupee (nhs) study |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crossancatriona aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT dehbihakimmoulay aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT williamshilarie aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT poulterneil aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT rodgersanthony aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT janstephen aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT thomsimon aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT lordjoanne aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT crossancatriona protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT dehbihakimmoulay protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT williamshilarie protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT poulterneil protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT rodgersanthony protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT janstephen protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT thomsimon protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy AT lordjoanne protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy |