Cargando…

A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study

INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crossan, Catriona, Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay, Williams, Hilarie, Poulter, Neil, Rodgers, Anthony, Jan, Stephen, Thom, Simon, Lord, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063
_version_ 1783307516256452608
author Crossan, Catriona
Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay
Williams, Hilarie
Poulter, Neil
Rodgers, Anthony
Jan, Stephen
Thom, Simon
Lord, Joanne
author_facet Crossan, Catriona
Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay
Williams, Hilarie
Poulter, Neil
Rodgers, Anthony
Jan, Stephen
Thom, Simon
Lord, Joanne
author_sort Crossan, Catriona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk thereof. The aim of Researching the UMPIRE Processes for Economic Evaluation in the National Health Service (RUPEE NHS) is to estimate the potential health economic impact of a polypill strategy for CVD prevention within the NHS using UMPIRE trial and other relevant data. This paper describes the design of a modelled economic evaluation of the impact of increased adherence to the polypill versus usual care among the UK UMPIRE participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: As recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making modelling guidelines, a review of published CVD models was undertaken to identify the most appropriate modelling approach and structure. The review was carried out in the electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE. 40 CVD models were identified from 57 studies, the majority of economic models were health state transition cohort models and individual-level simulation models. The findings were discussed with clinical experts to confirm the approach and structure. An individual simulation approach was identified as the most suitable method to capture the heterogeneity in the population at CVD risk. RUPEE-NHS will use UMPIRE trial data on adherence to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the polypill strategy. DISSEMINATION: The evaluation findings will be presented in open-access scientific and healthcare policy journals and at national and international conferences. We will also present findings to NHS policy makers and pharmaceutical companies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58576922018-03-20 A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study Crossan, Catriona Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay Williams, Hilarie Poulter, Neil Rodgers, Anthony Jan, Stephen Thom, Simon Lord, Joanne BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: The ‘Use of a Multi-drug Pill in Reducing cardiovascular Events’ (UMPIRE) trial was a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence to indicated medication in a population with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of or at high risk thereof. The aim of Researching the UMPIRE Processes for Economic Evaluation in the National Health Service (RUPEE NHS) is to estimate the potential health economic impact of a polypill strategy for CVD prevention within the NHS using UMPIRE trial and other relevant data. This paper describes the design of a modelled economic evaluation of the impact of increased adherence to the polypill versus usual care among the UK UMPIRE participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: As recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making modelling guidelines, a review of published CVD models was undertaken to identify the most appropriate modelling approach and structure. The review was carried out in the electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE. 40 CVD models were identified from 57 studies, the majority of economic models were health state transition cohort models and individual-level simulation models. The findings were discussed with clinical experts to confirm the approach and structure. An individual simulation approach was identified as the most suitable method to capture the heterogeneity in the population at CVD risk. RUPEE-NHS will use UMPIRE trial data on adherence to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the polypill strategy. DISSEMINATION: The evaluation findings will be presented in open-access scientific and healthcare policy journals and at national and international conferences. We will also present findings to NHS policy makers and pharmaceutical companies. BMJ Open 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5857692/ /pubmed/29540403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Crossan, Catriona
Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay
Williams, Hilarie
Poulter, Neil
Rodgers, Anthony
Jan, Stephen
Thom, Simon
Lord, Joanne
A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title_full A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title_fullStr A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title_short A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study
title_sort protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a uk nhs setting: rupee (nhs) study
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013063
work_keys_str_mv AT crossancatriona aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT dehbihakimmoulay aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT williamshilarie aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT poulterneil aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT rodgersanthony aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT janstephen aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT thomsimon aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT lordjoanne aprotocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT crossancatriona protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT dehbihakimmoulay protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT williamshilarie protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT poulterneil protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT rodgersanthony protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT janstephen protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT thomsimon protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy
AT lordjoanne protocolforaneconomicevaluationofapolypillinpatientswithestablishedorathighriskofcardiovasculardiseaseinauknhssettingrupeenhsstudy