Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Jacqueline, Pritchard, Mark G, Cheng, Lok Yin, Janarthanan, Roshni, Leal, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740
_version_ 1783307518369333248
author Murphy, Jacqueline
Pritchard, Mark G
Cheng, Lok Yin
Janarthanan, Roshni
Leal, José
author_facet Murphy, Jacqueline
Pritchard, Mark G
Cheng, Lok Yin
Janarthanan, Roshni
Leal, José
author_sort Murphy, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after surgery. To support policymaking, there is a need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways across jurisdictions. Our aim is to systematically summarise the published cost-effectiveness evidence on enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement, both as a whole and for each of the various components of enhanced recovery pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Econlit and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database. Separate search strategies were developed for each database including terms relating to hip and knee replacement/arthroplasty, economic evaluations, decision modelling and quality of life measures. We will extract peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2017 reporting economic evaluations of preoperative, perioperative or postoperative enhanced recovery interventions within hip or knee replacement. Economic evaluations alongside cohort studies or based on decision models will be included. Only studies with patients undergoing elective replacement surgery of the hip or knee will be included. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma following best practice guidelines for economic evaluation, decision modelling and model validation. Our primary outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery (entire pathway and individual components) in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented, focussing on cost-effectiveness results, study design, quality and validation status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review is exempted from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The results of the review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed academic journal and at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059473.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58577012018-03-20 Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol Murphy, Jacqueline Pritchard, Mark G Cheng, Lok Yin Janarthanan, Roshni Leal, José BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after surgery. To support policymaking, there is a need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways across jurisdictions. Our aim is to systematically summarise the published cost-effectiveness evidence on enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement, both as a whole and for each of the various components of enhanced recovery pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Econlit and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database. Separate search strategies were developed for each database including terms relating to hip and knee replacement/arthroplasty, economic evaluations, decision modelling and quality of life measures. We will extract peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2017 reporting economic evaluations of preoperative, perioperative or postoperative enhanced recovery interventions within hip or knee replacement. Economic evaluations alongside cohort studies or based on decision models will be included. Only studies with patients undergoing elective replacement surgery of the hip or knee will be included. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma following best practice guidelines for economic evaluation, decision modelling and model validation. Our primary outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery (entire pathway and individual components) in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented, focussing on cost-effectiveness results, study design, quality and validation status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review is exempted from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The results of the review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed academic journal and at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059473. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5857701/ /pubmed/29540418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Murphy, Jacqueline
Pritchard, Mark G
Cheng, Lok Yin
Janarthanan, Roshni
Leal, José
Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title_full Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title_short Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
title_sort cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyjacqueline costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol
AT pritchardmarkg costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chenglokyin costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol
AT janarthananroshni costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lealjose costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol