Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740 |
_version_ | 1783307518369333248 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Jacqueline Pritchard, Mark G Cheng, Lok Yin Janarthanan, Roshni Leal, José |
author_facet | Murphy, Jacqueline Pritchard, Mark G Cheng, Lok Yin Janarthanan, Roshni Leal, José |
author_sort | Murphy, Jacqueline |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after surgery. To support policymaking, there is a need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways across jurisdictions. Our aim is to systematically summarise the published cost-effectiveness evidence on enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement, both as a whole and for each of the various components of enhanced recovery pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Econlit and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database. Separate search strategies were developed for each database including terms relating to hip and knee replacement/arthroplasty, economic evaluations, decision modelling and quality of life measures. We will extract peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2017 reporting economic evaluations of preoperative, perioperative or postoperative enhanced recovery interventions within hip or knee replacement. Economic evaluations alongside cohort studies or based on decision models will be included. Only studies with patients undergoing elective replacement surgery of the hip or knee will be included. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma following best practice guidelines for economic evaluation, decision modelling and model validation. Our primary outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery (entire pathway and individual components) in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented, focussing on cost-effectiveness results, study design, quality and validation status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review is exempted from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The results of the review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed academic journal and at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059473. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58577012018-03-20 Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol Murphy, Jacqueline Pritchard, Mark G Cheng, Lok Yin Janarthanan, Roshni Leal, José BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee replacement represents a significant burden to the UK healthcare system. ‘Enhanced recovery’ pathways have been introduced in the National Health Service (NHS) for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement, with the aim of improving outcomes and timely recovery after surgery. To support policymaking, there is a need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways across jurisdictions. Our aim is to systematically summarise the published cost-effectiveness evidence on enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement, both as a whole and for each of the various components of enhanced recovery pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Econlit and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database. Separate search strategies were developed for each database including terms relating to hip and knee replacement/arthroplasty, economic evaluations, decision modelling and quality of life measures. We will extract peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2017 reporting economic evaluations of preoperative, perioperative or postoperative enhanced recovery interventions within hip or knee replacement. Economic evaluations alongside cohort studies or based on decision models will be included. Only studies with patients undergoing elective replacement surgery of the hip or knee will be included. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma following best practice guidelines for economic evaluation, decision modelling and model validation. Our primary outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery (entire pathway and individual components) in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented, focussing on cost-effectiveness results, study design, quality and validation status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review is exempted from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The results of the review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed academic journal and at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059473. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5857701/ /pubmed/29540418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Murphy, Jacqueline Pritchard, Mark G Cheng, Lok Yin Janarthanan, Roshni Leal, José Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title | Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphyjacqueline costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol AT pritchardmarkg costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol AT chenglokyin costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol AT janarthananroshni costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol AT lealjose costeffectivenessofenhancedrecoveryinhipandkneereplacementasystematicreviewprotocol |