Cargando…
Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666 |
_version_ | 1783307519286837248 |
---|---|
author | Matsui, Yoichi Satoi, Sohei Hirooka, Satoshi Kosaka, Hisashi Kawaura, Takayuki Kitawaki, Tomoki |
author_facet | Matsui, Yoichi Satoi, Sohei Hirooka, Satoshi Kosaka, Hisashi Kawaura, Takayuki Kitawaki, Tomoki |
author_sort | Matsui, Yoichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that prophylactic antibiotics are not required for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This study aimed to assess the validity of this conclusion by systematically reviewing these meta-analyses. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. Searches were limited to meta-analyses and systematic reviews. PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception until March 2016 using the following keyword combinations: ‘antibiotic prophylaxis’, ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ and ‘systematic review or meta-analysis’. Two independent reviewers selected meta-analyses or systematic reviews evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed in these meta-analyses were also reviewed. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses regarding prophylactic antibiotics for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy that had examined a total of 28 RCTs were included. Review of these meta-analyses revealed 48 miscounts of the number of outcomes. Six RCTs were inappropriate for the meta-analyses; one targeted patients with acute cholecystitis, another measured inappropriate outcomes, the original source of a third was not found and the study protocols of the remaining three were not appropriate for the meta-analyses. After correcting the above miscounts and excluding the six inappropriate RCTs, pooled risk ratios (RRs) were recalculated. These showed that, contrary to what had previously been concluded, antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infections. The rates of surgical site, distant and overall infections were all significantly reduced by antibiotic administration (RR (95% CI); 0.71 (0.51 to 0.99), 0.37 (0.19 to 0.73), 0.50 (0.34 to 0.75), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of postoperative infections after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5857705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58577052018-03-20 Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews Matsui, Yoichi Satoi, Sohei Hirooka, Satoshi Kosaka, Hisashi Kawaura, Takayuki Kitawaki, Tomoki BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that prophylactic antibiotics are not required for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This study aimed to assess the validity of this conclusion by systematically reviewing these meta-analyses. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. Searches were limited to meta-analyses and systematic reviews. PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception until March 2016 using the following keyword combinations: ‘antibiotic prophylaxis’, ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ and ‘systematic review or meta-analysis’. Two independent reviewers selected meta-analyses or systematic reviews evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed in these meta-analyses were also reviewed. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses regarding prophylactic antibiotics for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy that had examined a total of 28 RCTs were included. Review of these meta-analyses revealed 48 miscounts of the number of outcomes. Six RCTs were inappropriate for the meta-analyses; one targeted patients with acute cholecystitis, another measured inappropriate outcomes, the original source of a third was not found and the study protocols of the remaining three were not appropriate for the meta-analyses. After correcting the above miscounts and excluding the six inappropriate RCTs, pooled risk ratios (RRs) were recalculated. These showed that, contrary to what had previously been concluded, antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infections. The rates of surgical site, distant and overall infections were all significantly reduced by antibiotic administration (RR (95% CI); 0.71 (0.51 to 0.99), 0.37 (0.19 to 0.73), 0.50 (0.34 to 0.75), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of postoperative infections after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5857705/ /pubmed/29549197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Matsui, Yoichi Satoi, Sohei Hirooka, Satoshi Kosaka, Hisashi Kawaura, Takayuki Kitawaki, Tomoki Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title | Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_full | Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_short | Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_sort | reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuiyoichi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT satoisohei reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT hirookasatoshi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT kosakahisashi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT kawauratakayuki reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT kitawakitomoki reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews |