Cargando…

Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews

INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsui, Yoichi, Satoi, Sohei, Hirooka, Satoshi, Kosaka, Hisashi, Kawaura, Takayuki, Kitawaki, Tomoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666
_version_ 1783307519286837248
author Matsui, Yoichi
Satoi, Sohei
Hirooka, Satoshi
Kosaka, Hisashi
Kawaura, Takayuki
Kitawaki, Tomoki
author_facet Matsui, Yoichi
Satoi, Sohei
Hirooka, Satoshi
Kosaka, Hisashi
Kawaura, Takayuki
Kitawaki, Tomoki
author_sort Matsui, Yoichi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that prophylactic antibiotics are not required for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This study aimed to assess the validity of this conclusion by systematically reviewing these meta-analyses. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. Searches were limited to meta-analyses and systematic reviews. PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception until March 2016 using the following keyword combinations: ‘antibiotic prophylaxis’, ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ and ‘systematic review or meta-analysis’. Two independent reviewers selected meta-analyses or systematic reviews evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed in these meta-analyses were also reviewed. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses regarding prophylactic antibiotics for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy that had examined a total of 28 RCTs were included. Review of these meta-analyses revealed 48 miscounts of the number of outcomes. Six RCTs were inappropriate for the meta-analyses; one targeted patients with acute cholecystitis, another measured inappropriate outcomes, the original source of a third was not found and the study protocols of the remaining three were not appropriate for the meta-analyses. After correcting the above miscounts and excluding the six inappropriate RCTs, pooled risk ratios (RRs) were recalculated. These showed that, contrary to what had previously been concluded, antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infections. The rates of surgical site, distant and overall infections were all significantly reduced by antibiotic administration (RR (95% CI); 0.71 (0.51 to 0.99), 0.37 (0.19 to 0.73), 0.50 (0.34 to 0.75), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of postoperative infections after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5857705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58577052018-03-20 Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews Matsui, Yoichi Satoi, Sohei Hirooka, Satoshi Kosaka, Hisashi Kawaura, Takayuki Kitawaki, Tomoki BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology INTRODUCTION: Many researchers have addressed overdosage and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Many meta-analyses have investigated antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Most of these meta-analyses have concluded that prophylactic antibiotics are not required for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This study aimed to assess the validity of this conclusion by systematically reviewing these meta-analyses. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. Searches were limited to meta-analyses and systematic reviews. PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception until March 2016 using the following keyword combinations: ‘antibiotic prophylaxis’, ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ and ‘systematic review or meta-analysis’. Two independent reviewers selected meta-analyses or systematic reviews evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed in these meta-analyses were also reviewed. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses regarding prophylactic antibiotics for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy that had examined a total of 28 RCTs were included. Review of these meta-analyses revealed 48 miscounts of the number of outcomes. Six RCTs were inappropriate for the meta-analyses; one targeted patients with acute cholecystitis, another measured inappropriate outcomes, the original source of a third was not found and the study protocols of the remaining three were not appropriate for the meta-analyses. After correcting the above miscounts and excluding the six inappropriate RCTs, pooled risk ratios (RRs) were recalculated. These showed that, contrary to what had previously been concluded, antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infections. The rates of surgical site, distant and overall infections were all significantly reduced by antibiotic administration (RR (95% CI); 0.71 (0.51 to 0.99), 0.37 (0.19 to 0.73), 0.50 (0.34 to 0.75), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of postoperative infections after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5857705/ /pubmed/29549197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Matsui, Yoichi
Satoi, Sohei
Hirooka, Satoshi
Kosaka, Hisashi
Kawaura, Takayuki
Kitawaki, Tomoki
Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort reappraisal of previously reported meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis for low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an overview of systematic reviews
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016666
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuiyoichi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT satoisohei reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT hirookasatoshi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT kosakahisashi reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT kawauratakayuki reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT kitawakitomoki reappraisalofpreviouslyreportedmetaanalysesonantibioticprophylaxisforlowrisklaparoscopiccholecystectomyanoverviewofsystematicreviews