Cargando…
Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clini...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556559 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47 |
_version_ | 1783307573340930048 |
---|---|
author | Lobb, Douglas Clarke, Alix Lai, Hollis |
author_facet | Lobb, Douglas Clarke, Alix Lai, Hollis |
author_sort | Lobb, Douglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clinic during its transition from a midazolam-first to a fentanyl-first protocol for dental procedures requiring moderate IV sedation. Physiological parameters, drug administration times, patient recovery times, drug dosages, and patient recall and satisfaction were investigated for differences. RESULTS: A total of 76 charts (40 midazolam-first and 36 fentanyl-first administrations), were used in the analysis. Administering midazolam first resulted in an average 4.38 min (52%) decrease in administration times (P < 0.001), and a decrease in procedural recollection immediately following the procedure (P = 0.03), and 24 to 48 hours later (P = 0.009). Administering fentanyl first required an average of 2.43 mg (29%) less midazolam (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for change in vital signs, minimum oxygen saturation levels, recovery times, and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05). Oxygen saturation levels did not drop below 90% for either group; however, 5 cases in the fentanyl-first group fell to between 90% and 92%, compared with 0 cases in the midazolam-first group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration order of fentanyl and midazolam may have different effects on patients and the sedation procedure. Findings from this study should be used to facilitate discussion among dental practitioners and to guide additional research investigating this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5858011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58580112018-03-19 Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation Lobb, Douglas Clarke, Alix Lai, Hollis J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clinic during its transition from a midazolam-first to a fentanyl-first protocol for dental procedures requiring moderate IV sedation. Physiological parameters, drug administration times, patient recovery times, drug dosages, and patient recall and satisfaction were investigated for differences. RESULTS: A total of 76 charts (40 midazolam-first and 36 fentanyl-first administrations), were used in the analysis. Administering midazolam first resulted in an average 4.38 min (52%) decrease in administration times (P < 0.001), and a decrease in procedural recollection immediately following the procedure (P = 0.03), and 24 to 48 hours later (P = 0.009). Administering fentanyl first required an average of 2.43 mg (29%) less midazolam (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for change in vital signs, minimum oxygen saturation levels, recovery times, and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05). Oxygen saturation levels did not drop below 90% for either group; however, 5 cases in the fentanyl-first group fell to between 90% and 92%, compared with 0 cases in the midazolam-first group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration order of fentanyl and midazolam may have different effects on patients and the sedation procedure. Findings from this study should be used to facilitate discussion among dental practitioners and to guide additional research investigating this topic. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2018-02 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5858011/ /pubmed/29556559 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47 Text en Copyright © 2018 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lobb, Douglas Clarke, Alix Lai, Hollis Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title | Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title_full | Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title_fullStr | Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title_full_unstemmed | Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title_short | Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
title_sort | administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556559 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lobbdouglas administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation AT clarkealix administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation AT laihollis administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation |