Cargando…

Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobb, Douglas, Clarke, Alix, Lai, Hollis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556559
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47
_version_ 1783307573340930048
author Lobb, Douglas
Clarke, Alix
Lai, Hollis
author_facet Lobb, Douglas
Clarke, Alix
Lai, Hollis
author_sort Lobb, Douglas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clinic during its transition from a midazolam-first to a fentanyl-first protocol for dental procedures requiring moderate IV sedation. Physiological parameters, drug administration times, patient recovery times, drug dosages, and patient recall and satisfaction were investigated for differences. RESULTS: A total of 76 charts (40 midazolam-first and 36 fentanyl-first administrations), were used in the analysis. Administering midazolam first resulted in an average 4.38 min (52%) decrease in administration times (P < 0.001), and a decrease in procedural recollection immediately following the procedure (P = 0.03), and 24 to 48 hours later (P = 0.009). Administering fentanyl first required an average of 2.43 mg (29%) less midazolam (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for change in vital signs, minimum oxygen saturation levels, recovery times, and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05). Oxygen saturation levels did not drop below 90% for either group; however, 5 cases in the fentanyl-first group fell to between 90% and 92%, compared with 0 cases in the midazolam-first group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration order of fentanyl and midazolam may have different effects on patients and the sedation procedure. Findings from this study should be used to facilitate discussion among dental practitioners and to guide additional research investigating this topic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5858011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58580112018-03-19 Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation Lobb, Douglas Clarke, Alix Lai, Hollis J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clinic during its transition from a midazolam-first to a fentanyl-first protocol for dental procedures requiring moderate IV sedation. Physiological parameters, drug administration times, patient recovery times, drug dosages, and patient recall and satisfaction were investigated for differences. RESULTS: A total of 76 charts (40 midazolam-first and 36 fentanyl-first administrations), were used in the analysis. Administering midazolam first resulted in an average 4.38 min (52%) decrease in administration times (P < 0.001), and a decrease in procedural recollection immediately following the procedure (P = 0.03), and 24 to 48 hours later (P = 0.009). Administering fentanyl first required an average of 2.43 mg (29%) less midazolam (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for change in vital signs, minimum oxygen saturation levels, recovery times, and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05). Oxygen saturation levels did not drop below 90% for either group; however, 5 cases in the fentanyl-first group fell to between 90% and 92%, compared with 0 cases in the midazolam-first group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration order of fentanyl and midazolam may have different effects on patients and the sedation procedure. Findings from this study should be used to facilitate discussion among dental practitioners and to guide additional research investigating this topic. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2018-02 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5858011/ /pubmed/29556559 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47 Text en Copyright © 2018 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lobb, Douglas
Clarke, Alix
Lai, Hollis
Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title_full Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title_fullStr Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title_full_unstemmed Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title_short Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
title_sort administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556559
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbdouglas administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation
AT clarkealix administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation
AT laihollis administrationorderofmidazolamfentanylformoderatedentalsedation