Cargando…

Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve

BACKGROUND: The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khemka, Aditya, Mograby, Omar, Lord, Sarah J, Doyle, Zelda, Al Muderis, Munjed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576639
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_314_16
_version_ 1783307608088641536
author Khemka, Aditya
Mograby, Omar
Lord, Sarah J
Doyle, Zelda
Al Muderis, Munjed
author_facet Khemka, Aditya
Mograby, Omar
Lord, Sarah J
Doyle, Zelda
Al Muderis, Munjed
author_sort Khemka, Aditya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety, efficacy and learning curve are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed all patients who were operated for a THR with a short neck preserving stem (MiniHip) between 2012 and 2014. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time; stem size; and adverse events including periprosthetic fracture; paresthesia; and limb length discrepancy (LLD). The cohort was divided into equal groups to assess the learning curve effect, and the cumulative sums (CUSUM) test was performed to monitor intraoperative neck fractures. For assessment of efficacy, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: 138 patients with median age 62 years (range 35–82 years) were included with a median followup of 42 months (range 30–56 months). The minimum followup was 2.5 years. The OHS, SF-36 (physical and mental component) scores improved by a mean score of 26, 28, and 27 points, respectively. All patients had LLD of <10 mm (1.9 mm ± 1.3). Adverse events included intraoperative neck fracture (n = 6), subsidence (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 12), and trochanteric bursitis (n = 2). After early modification of the technique to use a smaller finishing broach, the CUSUM test demonstrated acceptable intraoperative neck fracture risk. The second surgery group had a reduced risk of intraoperative neck fracture (5/69 vs. 1/69 P = 0.2), reduced operative time (66 vs. 61 min, P = 0.06), and increased stem size (5 vs. 6, P = 0.09) although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The MiniHip stem is safe alternative to standard THR with good functional outcomes but with a learning curve for the surgical technique, implants sizing, and the risk of intraoperative neck fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5858205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58582052018-03-23 Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve Khemka, Aditya Mograby, Omar Lord, Sarah J Doyle, Zelda Al Muderis, Munjed Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety, efficacy and learning curve are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed all patients who were operated for a THR with a short neck preserving stem (MiniHip) between 2012 and 2014. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time; stem size; and adverse events including periprosthetic fracture; paresthesia; and limb length discrepancy (LLD). The cohort was divided into equal groups to assess the learning curve effect, and the cumulative sums (CUSUM) test was performed to monitor intraoperative neck fractures. For assessment of efficacy, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: 138 patients with median age 62 years (range 35–82 years) were included with a median followup of 42 months (range 30–56 months). The minimum followup was 2.5 years. The OHS, SF-36 (physical and mental component) scores improved by a mean score of 26, 28, and 27 points, respectively. All patients had LLD of <10 mm (1.9 mm ± 1.3). Adverse events included intraoperative neck fracture (n = 6), subsidence (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 12), and trochanteric bursitis (n = 2). After early modification of the technique to use a smaller finishing broach, the CUSUM test demonstrated acceptable intraoperative neck fracture risk. The second surgery group had a reduced risk of intraoperative neck fracture (5/69 vs. 1/69 P = 0.2), reduced operative time (66 vs. 61 min, P = 0.06), and increased stem size (5 vs. 6, P = 0.09) although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The MiniHip stem is safe alternative to standard THR with good functional outcomes but with a learning curve for the surgical technique, implants sizing, and the risk of intraoperative neck fractures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5858205/ /pubmed/29576639 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_314_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khemka, Aditya
Mograby, Omar
Lord, Sarah J
Doyle, Zelda
Al Muderis, Munjed
Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title_full Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title_fullStr Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title_full_unstemmed Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title_short Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve
title_sort total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach using a neck-preserving stem: safety, efficacy and learning curve
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576639
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_314_16
work_keys_str_mv AT khemkaaditya totalhiparthroplastybythedirectanteriorapproachusinganeckpreservingstemsafetyefficacyandlearningcurve
AT mograbyomar totalhiparthroplastybythedirectanteriorapproachusinganeckpreservingstemsafetyefficacyandlearningcurve
AT lordsarahj totalhiparthroplastybythedirectanteriorapproachusinganeckpreservingstemsafetyefficacyandlearningcurve
AT doylezelda totalhiparthroplastybythedirectanteriorapproachusinganeckpreservingstemsafetyefficacyandlearningcurve
AT almuderismunjed totalhiparthroplastybythedirectanteriorapproachusinganeckpreservingstemsafetyefficacyandlearningcurve