Cargando…

Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures

BACKGROUND: Patient positioning for performing spinal blockade causes severe pain in hip and femur fracture. Adequate pain relief before administrating spinal blockade will increase patient's cooperation. This study was done to assess analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kacha, Nirav Jentilal, Jadeja, Chetna A, Patel, Pooja J, Chaudhari, Harshda B, Jivani, Jatin R, Pithadia, Vandana S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576642
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_298_16
_version_ 1783307608773361664
author Kacha, Nirav Jentilal
Jadeja, Chetna A
Patel, Pooja J
Chaudhari, Harshda B
Jivani, Jatin R
Pithadia, Vandana S
author_facet Kacha, Nirav Jentilal
Jadeja, Chetna A
Patel, Pooja J
Chaudhari, Harshda B
Jivani, Jatin R
Pithadia, Vandana S
author_sort Kacha, Nirav Jentilal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient positioning for performing spinal blockade causes severe pain in hip and femur fracture. Adequate pain relief before administrating spinal blockade will increase patient's cooperation. This study was done to assess analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning for spinal anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double blind, controlled prospective study that included 100 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statuses I to III, of either sex, between 30 and 90 years, posted for hip or proximal femoral surgery, with visual analogue scale (VAS) >3 in preoperative period. The two groups were assigned randomly. In Group 1, FICB was given half an hour before shifting the patients in operation theater with 30 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine, and in Group 2, sham block was given with 30 ml normal saline. Each group included 50 patients. Thirty minutes after FICB, spinal anesthesia was given and patients’ vitals were monitored before and after block, at the time of positioning for spinal anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative periods. RESULTS: In Group 1, mean VAS before FICB was 8.02 which reduced to 2.28, which is statistically significant (P = 7.8813E-50), whereas in Group 2, mean VAS before sham block was 7.98 which reduced to 7.90, which is statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.6694). Mean total duration of analgesia in Group 1 was 428.3 min after spinal anesthesia, whereas in Group 2, mean total duration of analgesia was 240.1 min. CONCLUSION: FICB effectively provides analgesia for positioning for spinal anesthesia to patients in hip and proximal femur surgeries. It also provides analgesia in postoperative period without having significant alteration in the hemodynamic profile of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5858208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58582082018-03-23 Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures Kacha, Nirav Jentilal Jadeja, Chetna A Patel, Pooja J Chaudhari, Harshda B Jivani, Jatin R Pithadia, Vandana S Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient positioning for performing spinal blockade causes severe pain in hip and femur fracture. Adequate pain relief before administrating spinal blockade will increase patient's cooperation. This study was done to assess analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning for spinal anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double blind, controlled prospective study that included 100 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statuses I to III, of either sex, between 30 and 90 years, posted for hip or proximal femoral surgery, with visual analogue scale (VAS) >3 in preoperative period. The two groups were assigned randomly. In Group 1, FICB was given half an hour before shifting the patients in operation theater with 30 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine, and in Group 2, sham block was given with 30 ml normal saline. Each group included 50 patients. Thirty minutes after FICB, spinal anesthesia was given and patients’ vitals were monitored before and after block, at the time of positioning for spinal anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative periods. RESULTS: In Group 1, mean VAS before FICB was 8.02 which reduced to 2.28, which is statistically significant (P = 7.8813E-50), whereas in Group 2, mean VAS before sham block was 7.98 which reduced to 7.90, which is statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.6694). Mean total duration of analgesia in Group 1 was 428.3 min after spinal anesthesia, whereas in Group 2, mean total duration of analgesia was 240.1 min. CONCLUSION: FICB effectively provides analgesia for positioning for spinal anesthesia to patients in hip and proximal femur surgeries. It also provides analgesia in postoperative period without having significant alteration in the hemodynamic profile of patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5858208/ /pubmed/29576642 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_298_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kacha, Nirav Jentilal
Jadeja, Chetna A
Patel, Pooja J
Chaudhari, Harshda B
Jivani, Jatin R
Pithadia, Vandana S
Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title_fullStr Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title_short Comparative Study for Evaluating Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Alleviating Pain of Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Hip and Proximal Femur Fractures
title_sort comparative study for evaluating efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for alleviating pain of positioning for spinal anesthesia in patients with hip and proximal femur fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576642
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_298_16
work_keys_str_mv AT kachaniravjentilal comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures
AT jadejachetnaa comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures
AT patelpoojaj comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures
AT chaudhariharshdab comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures
AT jivanijatinr comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures
AT pithadiavandanas comparativestudyforevaluatingefficacyoffasciailiacacompartmentblockforalleviatingpainofpositioningforspinalanesthesiainpatientswithhipandproximalfemurfractures