Cargando…

Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?

Perceived and objective measures of neighbourhood features have shown limited correspondence. Few studies have examined whether discordance between objective measures and individual perceptions of neighbourhood environments relates to individual health. Individuals with mismatched perceptions may be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baldock, Katherine L., Paquet, Catherine, Howard, Natasha J., Coffee, Neil T., Taylor, Anne W., Daniel, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020224
_version_ 1783307627058429952
author Baldock, Katherine L.
Paquet, Catherine
Howard, Natasha J.
Coffee, Neil T.
Taylor, Anne W.
Daniel, Mark
author_facet Baldock, Katherine L.
Paquet, Catherine
Howard, Natasha J.
Coffee, Neil T.
Taylor, Anne W.
Daniel, Mark
author_sort Baldock, Katherine L.
collection PubMed
description Perceived and objective measures of neighbourhood features have shown limited correspondence. Few studies have examined whether discordance between objective measures and individual perceptions of neighbourhood environments relates to individual health. Individuals with mismatched perceptions may benefit from initiatives to improve understandings of resource availability. This study utilised data from n = 1491 adult participants in a biomedical cohort to evaluate cross-sectional associations between measures of access (perceived, objective, and perceived-objective mismatch) to fruit and vegetable retailers (FVR) and public open space (POS), and clinically-measured metabolic syndrome and its component risk factors: central obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and pre-diabetes/diabetes. Access measures included perceived distances from home to the nearest FVR and POS, corresponding objectively-assessed road network distances, and the discordance between perceived and objective distances (overestimated (i.e., mismatched) distances versus matched perceived-objective distances). Individual and neighbourhood measures were spatially joined using a geographic information system. Associations were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression, accounting for individual and area-level covariates. Hypertension was positively associated with perceived distances to FVR (odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02, 1.28) and POS (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.34), after accounting for covariates and objective distances. Hypertension was positively associated with overestimating distances to FVR (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.80). Overestimating distances to POS was positively associated with both hypertension (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.83) and dyslipidaemia (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.57). Results provide new evidence for specific associations between perceived and overestimated distances from home to nearby resources and cardiometabolic risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5858293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58582932018-03-19 Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk? Baldock, Katherine L. Paquet, Catherine Howard, Natasha J. Coffee, Neil T. Taylor, Anne W. Daniel, Mark Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Perceived and objective measures of neighbourhood features have shown limited correspondence. Few studies have examined whether discordance between objective measures and individual perceptions of neighbourhood environments relates to individual health. Individuals with mismatched perceptions may benefit from initiatives to improve understandings of resource availability. This study utilised data from n = 1491 adult participants in a biomedical cohort to evaluate cross-sectional associations between measures of access (perceived, objective, and perceived-objective mismatch) to fruit and vegetable retailers (FVR) and public open space (POS), and clinically-measured metabolic syndrome and its component risk factors: central obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and pre-diabetes/diabetes. Access measures included perceived distances from home to the nearest FVR and POS, corresponding objectively-assessed road network distances, and the discordance between perceived and objective distances (overestimated (i.e., mismatched) distances versus matched perceived-objective distances). Individual and neighbourhood measures were spatially joined using a geographic information system. Associations were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression, accounting for individual and area-level covariates. Hypertension was positively associated with perceived distances to FVR (odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02, 1.28) and POS (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.34), after accounting for covariates and objective distances. Hypertension was positively associated with overestimating distances to FVR (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.80). Overestimating distances to POS was positively associated with both hypertension (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.83) and dyslipidaemia (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.57). Results provide new evidence for specific associations between perceived and overestimated distances from home to nearby resources and cardiometabolic risk factors. MDPI 2018-01-29 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5858293/ /pubmed/29382169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020224 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baldock, Katherine L.
Paquet, Catherine
Howard, Natasha J.
Coffee, Neil T.
Taylor, Anne W.
Daniel, Mark
Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title_full Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title_fullStr Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title_full_unstemmed Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title_short Are Perceived and Objective Distances to Fresh Food and Physical Activity Resources Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk?
title_sort are perceived and objective distances to fresh food and physical activity resources associated with cardiometabolic risk?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020224
work_keys_str_mv AT baldockkatherinel areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk
AT paquetcatherine areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk
AT howardnatashaj areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk
AT coffeeneilt areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk
AT taylorannew areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk
AT danielmark areperceivedandobjectivedistancestofreshfoodandphysicalactivityresourcesassociatedwithcardiometabolicrisk