Cargando…
Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election
Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002716658694 |
_version_ | 1783307693537099776 |
---|---|
author | Balliet, Daniel Tybur, Joshua M. Wu, Junhui Antonellis, Christian Van Lange, Paul A. M. |
author_facet | Balliet, Daniel Tybur, Joshua M. Wu, Junhui Antonellis, Christian Van Lange, Paul A. M. |
author_sort | Balliet, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r = .15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5858642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58586422018-03-26 Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election Balliet, Daniel Tybur, Joshua M. Wu, Junhui Antonellis, Christian Van Lange, Paul A. M. J Conflict Resolut Articles Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r = .15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups. SAGE Publications 2016-07-21 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5858642/ /pubmed/29593363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002716658694 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Balliet, Daniel Tybur, Joshua M. Wu, Junhui Antonellis, Christian Van Lange, Paul A. M. Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title | Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title_full | Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title_fullStr | Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title_full_unstemmed | Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title_short | Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election |
title_sort | political ideology, trust, and cooperation: in-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a us national election |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002716658694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballietdaniel politicalideologytrustandcooperationingroupfavoritismamongrepublicansanddemocratsduringausnationalelection AT tyburjoshuam politicalideologytrustandcooperationingroupfavoritismamongrepublicansanddemocratsduringausnationalelection AT wujunhui politicalideologytrustandcooperationingroupfavoritismamongrepublicansanddemocratsduringausnationalelection AT antonellischristian politicalideologytrustandcooperationingroupfavoritismamongrepublicansanddemocratsduringausnationalelection AT vanlangepaulam politicalideologytrustandcooperationingroupfavoritismamongrepublicansanddemocratsduringausnationalelection |