Cargando…

Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants

OBJECTIVE: Researchers traditionally rely on participant self-report for contraceptive use. We hypothesized that self-reported contraceptive use by clinical research participants may disagree with objectively measured hormonal status. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women in Harare, Zimbabwe, aged 18–34,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Achilles, Sharon L., Mhlanga, Felix G., Musara, Petina, Poloyac, Samuel M., Chirenje, Zvavahera M., Hillier, Sharon L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.013
_version_ 1783307725364527104
author Achilles, Sharon L.
Mhlanga, Felix G.
Musara, Petina
Poloyac, Samuel M.
Chirenje, Zvavahera M.
Hillier, Sharon L.
author_facet Achilles, Sharon L.
Mhlanga, Felix G.
Musara, Petina
Poloyac, Samuel M.
Chirenje, Zvavahera M.
Hillier, Sharon L.
author_sort Achilles, Sharon L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Researchers traditionally rely on participant self-report for contraceptive use. We hypothesized that self-reported contraceptive use by clinical research participants may disagree with objectively measured hormonal status. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women in Harare, Zimbabwe, aged 18–34, who by self-report had not used hormonal or intrauterine contraception for >30 days, or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for >10 months, into a study designed to assess biologic changes with contraceptive initiation and use. Blood samples obtained at enrollment and each follow-up visit (N=1630 from 447 participants) were evaluated by mass spectrometry for exogenous hormones. We individually interviewed a subset of participants (n=20) with discrepant self-reported and measured serum hormones to better understand nondisclosure of contraceptive use. RESULTS: Discrepant with self-reported nonuse of hormonal contraception, synthetic progestogens were detectable in 120/447 (27%, 95% confidence interval 23%–31%) enrolled women. Measured exogenous hormones consistent with use of contraceptive pills (n=102), injectables (n=20) and implants (n=3) were detected at enrollment, with 7 women likely using >1 contraceptive. In-depth interviews revealed that participants understood the requirement to be hormone free at enrollment (100%). Most (85%) cited partner noncooperation with condoms/withdrawal and/or pregnancy concerns as major reasons for nondisclosed contraceptive use. All interviewed women (100%) cited access to health care as a primary motivation for study participation. Of participants who accurately reported nonuse of hormonal contraception at enrollment, 41/327 (12.5%) had objective evidence of nonstudy progestin use at follow-up that disagreed with self-reported nonuse. CONCLUSIONS: Women joining contraceptive research studies may misrepresent their use of nonstudy contraceptive hormones at baseline and follow-up. Objective measures of hormone use are needed to ensure that study population exposures are accurately categorized. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Among Zimbabwean women participating in a contraceptive research study, 27% had objective evidence of use of nonstudy contraceptives at enrollment that disagreed with self-report. Studies that rely on self-report to identify contraceptive hormone exposure could suffer from significant misclassification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5858917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58589172018-04-01 Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants Achilles, Sharon L. Mhlanga, Felix G. Musara, Petina Poloyac, Samuel M. Chirenje, Zvavahera M. Hillier, Sharon L. Contraception Article OBJECTIVE: Researchers traditionally rely on participant self-report for contraceptive use. We hypothesized that self-reported contraceptive use by clinical research participants may disagree with objectively measured hormonal status. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women in Harare, Zimbabwe, aged 18–34, who by self-report had not used hormonal or intrauterine contraception for >30 days, or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for >10 months, into a study designed to assess biologic changes with contraceptive initiation and use. Blood samples obtained at enrollment and each follow-up visit (N=1630 from 447 participants) were evaluated by mass spectrometry for exogenous hormones. We individually interviewed a subset of participants (n=20) with discrepant self-reported and measured serum hormones to better understand nondisclosure of contraceptive use. RESULTS: Discrepant with self-reported nonuse of hormonal contraception, synthetic progestogens were detectable in 120/447 (27%, 95% confidence interval 23%–31%) enrolled women. Measured exogenous hormones consistent with use of contraceptive pills (n=102), injectables (n=20) and implants (n=3) were detected at enrollment, with 7 women likely using >1 contraceptive. In-depth interviews revealed that participants understood the requirement to be hormone free at enrollment (100%). Most (85%) cited partner noncooperation with condoms/withdrawal and/or pregnancy concerns as major reasons for nondisclosed contraceptive use. All interviewed women (100%) cited access to health care as a primary motivation for study participation. Of participants who accurately reported nonuse of hormonal contraception at enrollment, 41/327 (12.5%) had objective evidence of nonstudy progestin use at follow-up that disagreed with self-reported nonuse. CONCLUSIONS: Women joining contraceptive research studies may misrepresent their use of nonstudy contraceptive hormones at baseline and follow-up. Objective measures of hormone use are needed to ensure that study population exposures are accurately categorized. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Among Zimbabwean women participating in a contraceptive research study, 27% had objective evidence of use of nonstudy contraceptives at enrollment that disagreed with self-report. Studies that rely on self-report to identify contraceptive hormone exposure could suffer from significant misclassification. Elsevier 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5858917/ /pubmed/28966052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.013 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Achilles, Sharon L.
Mhlanga, Felix G.
Musara, Petina
Poloyac, Samuel M.
Chirenje, Zvavahera M.
Hillier, Sharon L.
Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title_full Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title_fullStr Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title_full_unstemmed Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title_short Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
title_sort misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.013
work_keys_str_mv AT achillessharonl misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants
AT mhlangafelixg misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants
AT musarapetina misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants
AT poloyacsamuelm misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants
AT chirenjezvavaheram misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants
AT hilliersharonl misreportingofcontraceptivehormoneuseinclinicalresearchparticipants