Cargando…

Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net

Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Sullivan, Jack W., Heneghan, Carl, Perera, Rafael, Oke, Jason, Aronson, Jeffrey K., Shine, Brian, Goldacre, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23263-z
_version_ 1783307792813129728
author O’Sullivan, Jack W.
Heneghan, Carl
Perera, Rafael
Oke, Jason
Aronson, Jeffrey K.
Shine, Brian
Goldacre, Ben
author_facet O’Sullivan, Jack W.
Heneghan, Carl
Perera, Rafael
Oke, Jason
Aronson, Jeffrey K.
Shine, Brian
Goldacre, Ben
author_sort O’Sullivan, Jack W.
collection PubMed
description Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We estimated the adjusted average proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that yielded abnormal results from each practice, after adjusting for differences in practice populations. These proportions were plotted against the total CRP and ESR requests per practice. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. We analysed 143,745 CRP and 30,758 ESR requests from 69 practices. Twelve (17%) and 7 (10%) practices were more than 3 standard deviations below the mean for CRP and ESR testing respectively. Two practices (3%) were below the 99.8% limit for both CRP and ESR ordering. Variation in the proportion of tests with an abnormal result shows promise for auditing variation in care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58592902018-03-20 Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net O’Sullivan, Jack W. Heneghan, Carl Perera, Rafael Oke, Jason Aronson, Jeffrey K. Shine, Brian Goldacre, Ben Sci Rep Article Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We estimated the adjusted average proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that yielded abnormal results from each practice, after adjusting for differences in practice populations. These proportions were plotted against the total CRP and ESR requests per practice. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. We analysed 143,745 CRP and 30,758 ESR requests from 69 practices. Twelve (17%) and 7 (10%) practices were more than 3 standard deviations below the mean for CRP and ESR testing respectively. Two practices (3%) were below the 99.8% limit for both CRP and ESR ordering. Variation in the proportion of tests with an abnormal result shows promise for auditing variation in care. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5859290/ /pubmed/29556075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23263-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
O’Sullivan, Jack W.
Heneghan, Carl
Perera, Rafael
Oke, Jason
Aronson, Jeffrey K.
Shine, Brian
Goldacre, Ben
Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_full Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_fullStr Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_full_unstemmed Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_short Variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for OpenPathology.net
title_sort variation in diagnostic test requests and outcomes: a preliminary metric for openpathology.net
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23263-z
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivanjackw variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT heneghancarl variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT pererarafael variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT okejason variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT aronsonjeffreyk variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT shinebrian variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet
AT goldacreben variationindiagnostictestrequestsandoutcomesapreliminarymetricforopenpathologynet