Cargando…
Unconscionable: how the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence lags behind the world when it comes to contraception and conscience
U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence undermines access to contraception by permitting individuals, institutions, and even corporations to claim religious objections to ensuring contraceptive insurance coverage, thus imposing those beliefs on non-adherents and jeopardizing their access to essential repro...
Autores principales: | Schvey, Aram A., Kim, Claire |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-018-0055-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court’s “Method of Execution” Jurisprudence
por: Dow, David R., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Justice Blocks and Predictability of U.S. Supreme Court Votes
por: Guimerà, Roger, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes
por: Chen, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Supreme Judicial Court
Publicado: (1869) -
US supreme court decision: the gastroenterological
perspective
por: Lahat, Adi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)