Cargando…

Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza, Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi, Jabbarvand, Mahmoud, Askarizadeh, Farshad, Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed, Narooie-Noori, Foroozan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002
_version_ 1783307848009121792
author Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza
Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi
Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
Askarizadeh, Farshad
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Narooie-Noori, Foroozan
author_facet Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza
Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi
Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
Askarizadeh, Farshad
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Narooie-Noori, Foroozan
author_sort Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in patients with PMD (n = 102) and KCN (n = 202) and normal subjects (n = 208) using the ORA. Data, including full patient history as well as the results of refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Pentacam HR (Oculus), and ORA (Reichert; Buffalo, New York, USA), were collected from medical records. Also, the data of only one eye per individual were selected for the analysis. The inclusion criteria for PMD and KCN groups were a reliable diagnosis of these ectatic disorders based on the clinical and corneal tomographic findings. CH, CRF, CH–CRF, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were assessed for each subject. Data were analyzed with SPSS and MedCalc using the ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The mean CH was 8.91 mmHg ± 1.05 [standard deviation (SD)], 8.43 ± 0.78, and 10.89 ± 1.08 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. Also, the mean CRF was 8.21 ± 1.35, 7.19 ± 1.11, and 10.69 ± 1.41 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. ANOVA showed differences in the mean CH, CRF, and CH–CRF between three groups (P < 0.001). Also, ROC curve analysis showed the cut-off points ≤9.5, ≤9.5, and >1.3 mmHg for CH, CRF, and CH–CRF in the PMD group, respectively. For biomechanical parameters in PMD eyes, CRF had the highest sensitivity (75.49%) while the greatest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was seen for CH (0.903). Moreover, central corneal thickness (CCT) showed no correlation with CH (P = 0.30, r = −0.104) or CRF (P = 0.75, r = 0.033) in the PMD group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the values of corneal biomechanics for PMD using the ORA. The results of the ORA were markedly different between PMD, KCN, and normal eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58595592018-03-21 Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Askarizadeh, Farshad Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Narooie-Noori, Foroozan J Curr Ophthalmol Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in patients with PMD (n = 102) and KCN (n = 202) and normal subjects (n = 208) using the ORA. Data, including full patient history as well as the results of refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Pentacam HR (Oculus), and ORA (Reichert; Buffalo, New York, USA), were collected from medical records. Also, the data of only one eye per individual were selected for the analysis. The inclusion criteria for PMD and KCN groups were a reliable diagnosis of these ectatic disorders based on the clinical and corneal tomographic findings. CH, CRF, CH–CRF, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were assessed for each subject. Data were analyzed with SPSS and MedCalc using the ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The mean CH was 8.91 mmHg ± 1.05 [standard deviation (SD)], 8.43 ± 0.78, and 10.89 ± 1.08 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. Also, the mean CRF was 8.21 ± 1.35, 7.19 ± 1.11, and 10.69 ± 1.41 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. ANOVA showed differences in the mean CH, CRF, and CH–CRF between three groups (P < 0.001). Also, ROC curve analysis showed the cut-off points ≤9.5, ≤9.5, and >1.3 mmHg for CH, CRF, and CH–CRF in the PMD group, respectively. For biomechanical parameters in PMD eyes, CRF had the highest sensitivity (75.49%) while the greatest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was seen for CH (0.903). Moreover, central corneal thickness (CCT) showed no correlation with CH (P = 0.30, r = −0.104) or CRF (P = 0.75, r = 0.033) in the PMD group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the values of corneal biomechanics for PMD using the ORA. The results of the ORA were markedly different between PMD, KCN, and normal eyes. Elsevier 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5859559/ /pubmed/29564407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002 Text en Copyright © 2018, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza
Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi
Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
Askarizadeh, Farshad
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Narooie-Noori, Foroozan
Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title_full Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title_fullStr Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title_short Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
title_sort corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sedaghatmohamadreza cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration
AT ostadimoghadamhadi cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration
AT jabbarvandmahmoud cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration
AT askarizadehfarshad cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration
AT momenimoghaddamhamed cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration
AT narooienooriforoozan cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration