Cargando…
Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002 |
_version_ | 1783307848009121792 |
---|---|
author | Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Askarizadeh, Farshad Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Narooie-Noori, Foroozan |
author_facet | Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Askarizadeh, Farshad Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Narooie-Noori, Foroozan |
author_sort | Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in patients with PMD (n = 102) and KCN (n = 202) and normal subjects (n = 208) using the ORA. Data, including full patient history as well as the results of refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Pentacam HR (Oculus), and ORA (Reichert; Buffalo, New York, USA), were collected from medical records. Also, the data of only one eye per individual were selected for the analysis. The inclusion criteria for PMD and KCN groups were a reliable diagnosis of these ectatic disorders based on the clinical and corneal tomographic findings. CH, CRF, CH–CRF, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were assessed for each subject. Data were analyzed with SPSS and MedCalc using the ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The mean CH was 8.91 mmHg ± 1.05 [standard deviation (SD)], 8.43 ± 0.78, and 10.89 ± 1.08 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. Also, the mean CRF was 8.21 ± 1.35, 7.19 ± 1.11, and 10.69 ± 1.41 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. ANOVA showed differences in the mean CH, CRF, and CH–CRF between three groups (P < 0.001). Also, ROC curve analysis showed the cut-off points ≤9.5, ≤9.5, and >1.3 mmHg for CH, CRF, and CH–CRF in the PMD group, respectively. For biomechanical parameters in PMD eyes, CRF had the highest sensitivity (75.49%) while the greatest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was seen for CH (0.903). Moreover, central corneal thickness (CCT) showed no correlation with CH (P = 0.30, r = −0.104) or CRF (P = 0.75, r = 0.033) in the PMD group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the values of corneal biomechanics for PMD using the ORA. The results of the ORA were markedly different between PMD, KCN, and normal eyes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5859559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58595592018-03-21 Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Askarizadeh, Farshad Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Narooie-Noori, Foroozan J Curr Ophthalmol Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), keratoconus (KCN), and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, corneal biomechanical parameters were measured in patients with PMD (n = 102) and KCN (n = 202) and normal subjects (n = 208) using the ORA. Data, including full patient history as well as the results of refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Pentacam HR (Oculus), and ORA (Reichert; Buffalo, New York, USA), were collected from medical records. Also, the data of only one eye per individual were selected for the analysis. The inclusion criteria for PMD and KCN groups were a reliable diagnosis of these ectatic disorders based on the clinical and corneal tomographic findings. CH, CRF, CH–CRF, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were assessed for each subject. Data were analyzed with SPSS and MedCalc using the ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The mean CH was 8.91 mmHg ± 1.05 [standard deviation (SD)], 8.43 ± 0.78, and 10.89 ± 1.08 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. Also, the mean CRF was 8.21 ± 1.35, 7.19 ± 1.11, and 10.69 ± 1.41 in the PMD, KCN, and normal group, respectively. ANOVA showed differences in the mean CH, CRF, and CH–CRF between three groups (P < 0.001). Also, ROC curve analysis showed the cut-off points ≤9.5, ≤9.5, and >1.3 mmHg for CH, CRF, and CH–CRF in the PMD group, respectively. For biomechanical parameters in PMD eyes, CRF had the highest sensitivity (75.49%) while the greatest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was seen for CH (0.903). Moreover, central corneal thickness (CCT) showed no correlation with CH (P = 0.30, r = −0.104) or CRF (P = 0.75, r = 0.033) in the PMD group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the values of corneal biomechanics for PMD using the ORA. The results of the ORA were markedly different between PMD, KCN, and normal eyes. Elsevier 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5859559/ /pubmed/29564407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002 Text en Copyright © 2018, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sedaghat, Mohamad Reza Ostadi-Moghadam, Hadi Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Askarizadeh, Farshad Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Narooie-Noori, Foroozan Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title | Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title_full | Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title_fullStr | Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title_short | Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
title_sort | corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sedaghatmohamadreza cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration AT ostadimoghadamhadi cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration AT jabbarvandmahmoud cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration AT askarizadehfarshad cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration AT momenimoghaddamhamed cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration AT narooienooriforoozan cornealhysteresisandcornealresistancefactorinpellucidmarginaldegeneration |