Cargando…
Quality indicators for eye bank
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17 |
_version_ | 1783307850308648960 |
---|---|
author | Acharya, Manisha Biswas, Saurabh Das, Animesh Mathur, Umang Dave, Abhishek Singh, Ashok Dubey, Suneeta |
author_facet | Acharya, Manisha Biswas, Saurabh Das, Animesh Mathur, Umang Dave, Abhishek Singh, Ashok Dubey, Suneeta |
author_sort | Acharya, Manisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions – “result quality” and “process quality.” The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011–2016. RESULTS: Adverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator. CONCLUSION: These indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5859592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58595922018-03-23 Quality indicators for eye bank Acharya, Manisha Biswas, Saurabh Das, Animesh Mathur, Umang Dave, Abhishek Singh, Ashok Dubey, Suneeta Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions – “result quality” and “process quality.” The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011–2016. RESULTS: Adverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator. CONCLUSION: These indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5859592/ /pubmed/29480248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Acharya, Manisha Biswas, Saurabh Das, Animesh Mathur, Umang Dave, Abhishek Singh, Ashok Dubey, Suneeta Quality indicators for eye bank |
title | Quality indicators for eye bank |
title_full | Quality indicators for eye bank |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators for eye bank |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators for eye bank |
title_short | Quality indicators for eye bank |
title_sort | quality indicators for eye bank |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acharyamanisha qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT biswassaurabh qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT dasanimesh qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT mathurumang qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT daveabhishek qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT singhashok qualityindicatorsforeyebank AT dubeysuneeta qualityindicatorsforeyebank |