Cargando…

Quality indicators for eye bank

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acharya, Manisha, Biswas, Saurabh, Das, Animesh, Mathur, Umang, Dave, Abhishek, Singh, Ashok, Dubey, Suneeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480248
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17
_version_ 1783307850308648960
author Acharya, Manisha
Biswas, Saurabh
Das, Animesh
Mathur, Umang
Dave, Abhishek
Singh, Ashok
Dubey, Suneeta
author_facet Acharya, Manisha
Biswas, Saurabh
Das, Animesh
Mathur, Umang
Dave, Abhishek
Singh, Ashok
Dubey, Suneeta
author_sort Acharya, Manisha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions – “result quality” and “process quality.” The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011–2016. RESULTS: Adverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator. CONCLUSION: These indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58595922018-03-23 Quality indicators for eye bank Acharya, Manisha Biswas, Saurabh Das, Animesh Mathur, Umang Dave, Abhishek Singh, Ashok Dubey, Suneeta Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity. METHODS: Adverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions – “result quality” and “process quality.” The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011–2016. RESULTS: Adverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator. CONCLUSION: These indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5859592/ /pubmed/29480248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Acharya, Manisha
Biswas, Saurabh
Das, Animesh
Mathur, Umang
Dave, Abhishek
Singh, Ashok
Dubey, Suneeta
Quality indicators for eye bank
title Quality indicators for eye bank
title_full Quality indicators for eye bank
title_fullStr Quality indicators for eye bank
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators for eye bank
title_short Quality indicators for eye bank
title_sort quality indicators for eye bank
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480248
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17
work_keys_str_mv AT acharyamanisha qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT biswassaurabh qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT dasanimesh qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT mathurumang qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT daveabhishek qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT singhashok qualityindicatorsforeyebank
AT dubeysuneeta qualityindicatorsforeyebank