Cargando…

Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of endometriosis and the need for treatment in the USA has led to the need to explore the contemporary cost burden associated with the disease. This retrospective cohort study compared direct and indirect healthcare costs in patients with endometriosis to a control group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Ahmed M., Surrey, Eric, Bonafede, Machaon, Nelson, James K., Castelli-Haley, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0667-3
_version_ 1783307874562211840
author Soliman, Ahmed M.
Surrey, Eric
Bonafede, Machaon
Nelson, James K.
Castelli-Haley, Jane
author_facet Soliman, Ahmed M.
Surrey, Eric
Bonafede, Machaon
Nelson, James K.
Castelli-Haley, Jane
author_sort Soliman, Ahmed M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of endometriosis and the need for treatment in the USA has led to the need to explore the contemporary cost burden associated with the disease. This retrospective cohort study compared direct and indirect healthcare costs in patients with endometriosis to a control group without endometriosis. METHODS: Women aged 18–49 years with endometriosis (date of initial diagnosis = index date) were identified in the Truven Health MarketScan(®) Commercial database between 2010 and 2014 and female control patients without endometriosis were matched by age and index year. The following outcomes were compared: healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods (including inpatient admissions, pharmacy claims, emergency room visits, physician office visits, and obstetrics/gynecology visits), annual direct (medical and pharmacy) and indirect (absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability) healthcare costs during the 12-month post-index period (in 2014 US$). Multivariate analyses were conducted to estimate annual total direct and indirect costs, controlling for demographics, pre-index clinical characteristics, and pre-index healthcare costs. RESULTS: Overall, 113,506 endometriosis patients and 927,599 controls were included. Endometriosis patients had significantly higher HRU during both the pre- and post-index periods compared to controls (p < 0.0001, all categories of HRU). Approximately two-thirds of endometriosis patients underwent an endometriosis-related surgical procedure (including laparotomy, laparoscopy, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and other excision/ablation procedures) in the first 12 months post-index. Mean annual total adjusted direct costs per endometriosis patient during the 12-month post-index period was over three times higher than that for a non-endometriosis control [$16,573 (standard deviation (SD) = $21,336) vs. $4733 (SD = $14,833); p < 0.005]. On average, incremental direct and indirect 12-month costs per endometriosis patient were $10,002 and $2132 compared to their matched controls (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients incurred significantly higher direct and indirect healthcare costs than non-endometriosis patients. FUNDING: AbbVie Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58596932018-03-22 Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States Soliman, Ahmed M. Surrey, Eric Bonafede, Machaon Nelson, James K. Castelli-Haley, Jane Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of endometriosis and the need for treatment in the USA has led to the need to explore the contemporary cost burden associated with the disease. This retrospective cohort study compared direct and indirect healthcare costs in patients with endometriosis to a control group without endometriosis. METHODS: Women aged 18–49 years with endometriosis (date of initial diagnosis = index date) were identified in the Truven Health MarketScan(®) Commercial database between 2010 and 2014 and female control patients without endometriosis were matched by age and index year. The following outcomes were compared: healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods (including inpatient admissions, pharmacy claims, emergency room visits, physician office visits, and obstetrics/gynecology visits), annual direct (medical and pharmacy) and indirect (absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability) healthcare costs during the 12-month post-index period (in 2014 US$). Multivariate analyses were conducted to estimate annual total direct and indirect costs, controlling for demographics, pre-index clinical characteristics, and pre-index healthcare costs. RESULTS: Overall, 113,506 endometriosis patients and 927,599 controls were included. Endometriosis patients had significantly higher HRU during both the pre- and post-index periods compared to controls (p < 0.0001, all categories of HRU). Approximately two-thirds of endometriosis patients underwent an endometriosis-related surgical procedure (including laparotomy, laparoscopy, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and other excision/ablation procedures) in the first 12 months post-index. Mean annual total adjusted direct costs per endometriosis patient during the 12-month post-index period was over three times higher than that for a non-endometriosis control [$16,573 (standard deviation (SD) = $21,336) vs. $4733 (SD = $14,833); p < 0.005]. On average, incremental direct and indirect 12-month costs per endometriosis patient were $10,002 and $2132 compared to their matched controls (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients incurred significantly higher direct and indirect healthcare costs than non-endometriosis patients. FUNDING: AbbVie Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-02-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5859693/ /pubmed/29450864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0667-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Soliman, Ahmed M.
Surrey, Eric
Bonafede, Machaon
Nelson, James K.
Castelli-Haley, Jane
Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title_full Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title_fullStr Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title_short Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States
title_sort real-world evaluation of direct and indirect economic burden among endometriosis patients in the united states
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0667-3
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanahmedm realworldevaluationofdirectandindirecteconomicburdenamongendometriosispatientsintheunitedstates
AT surreyeric realworldevaluationofdirectandindirecteconomicburdenamongendometriosispatientsintheunitedstates
AT bonafedemachaon realworldevaluationofdirectandindirecteconomicburdenamongendometriosispatientsintheunitedstates
AT nelsonjamesk realworldevaluationofdirectandindirecteconomicburdenamongendometriosispatientsintheunitedstates
AT castellihaleyjane realworldevaluationofdirectandindirecteconomicburdenamongendometriosispatientsintheunitedstates