Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein

BACKGROUND: Species-specific point-of-care tests (POCT) permit a rapid analysis of canine C-reactive protein (CRP), enabling veterinarians to include CRP in clinical decisions. Aim of the study was to evaluate a novel POCT for canine CRP (Point Strip™ Canine CRP Assay) run on a small in-house-analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hindenberg, Sarah, Keßler, Melanie, Zielinsky, Sabine, Langenstein, Judith, Moritz, Andreas, Bauer, Natali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29554960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1415-2
_version_ 1783307883387027456
author Hindenberg, Sarah
Keßler, Melanie
Zielinsky, Sabine
Langenstein, Judith
Moritz, Andreas
Bauer, Natali
author_facet Hindenberg, Sarah
Keßler, Melanie
Zielinsky, Sabine
Langenstein, Judith
Moritz, Andreas
Bauer, Natali
author_sort Hindenberg, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Species-specific point-of-care tests (POCT) permit a rapid analysis of canine C-reactive protein (CRP), enabling veterinarians to include CRP in clinical decisions. Aim of the study was to evaluate a novel POCT for canine CRP (Point Strip™ Canine CRP Assay) run on a small in-house-analyzer (Point Reader™ V) using lithium heparin plasma and to compare assay performance to an already established canine CRP assay (Gentian Canine CRP Immunoassay) run on two different bench top analyzers serving as reference methods (ABX Pentra 400, AU 5800). Linearity was assessed by stepwise dilution of plasma samples with high CRP concentrations. Limit of quantification (LoQ) was determined by repeated measurements of samples with low CRP concentrations. Coefficient of variation (CV) at low (10–50 mg/l), moderate (50–100 mg/l), and high (100–200 mg/l) CRP concentrations was investigated as well as possible interferences. Method comparison study was performed using 45 samples of healthy and diseased dogs. Quality criteria were fulfilled if the total observed error (TE(obs) = 2CV% + bias%) was below the minimal total allowable error of 44.4% (TE (min)). Additionally, a reference range (n = 60 healthy dogs) was established. RESULTS: Linearity was present at CRP concentrations of 10–132 mg/l (≙ 361 mg/l CRP with reference method) with a LoQ set at 10 mg/l. At moderate to high CRP concentrations, intra- and inter-assay CVs were ≤ 8% and ≤ 11% respectively, while CVs ≤ 22% and ≤ 28% were present at low concentrations. No interferences were observed at concentrations of 4 g/l hemoglobin, 800 mg/l bilirubin and 8 g/l triglycerides. Method comparison study demonstrated an excellent correlation with both reference methods (r = 0.98 for ABX Pentra 400; 0.99 for AU 5800), though revealing a proportional bias of 19.7% (ABX Pentra 400) and 10.7% (AU 5800) respectively. TE(obs) was 26.7–31.9% and 16.7–21.9% and thus < TE(min). Healthy dogs presented with CRP values ≤11.9 mg/l. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT precisely detects canine CRP at clinically relevant moderate and high CRP concentrations. The assay correlates well with both reference methods. Due to the bias, however, follow-up examinations should be performed with the same assay and analyzer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58597312018-03-22 Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein Hindenberg, Sarah Keßler, Melanie Zielinsky, Sabine Langenstein, Judith Moritz, Andreas Bauer, Natali BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Species-specific point-of-care tests (POCT) permit a rapid analysis of canine C-reactive protein (CRP), enabling veterinarians to include CRP in clinical decisions. Aim of the study was to evaluate a novel POCT for canine CRP (Point Strip™ Canine CRP Assay) run on a small in-house-analyzer (Point Reader™ V) using lithium heparin plasma and to compare assay performance to an already established canine CRP assay (Gentian Canine CRP Immunoassay) run on two different bench top analyzers serving as reference methods (ABX Pentra 400, AU 5800). Linearity was assessed by stepwise dilution of plasma samples with high CRP concentrations. Limit of quantification (LoQ) was determined by repeated measurements of samples with low CRP concentrations. Coefficient of variation (CV) at low (10–50 mg/l), moderate (50–100 mg/l), and high (100–200 mg/l) CRP concentrations was investigated as well as possible interferences. Method comparison study was performed using 45 samples of healthy and diseased dogs. Quality criteria were fulfilled if the total observed error (TE(obs) = 2CV% + bias%) was below the minimal total allowable error of 44.4% (TE (min)). Additionally, a reference range (n = 60 healthy dogs) was established. RESULTS: Linearity was present at CRP concentrations of 10–132 mg/l (≙ 361 mg/l CRP with reference method) with a LoQ set at 10 mg/l. At moderate to high CRP concentrations, intra- and inter-assay CVs were ≤ 8% and ≤ 11% respectively, while CVs ≤ 22% and ≤ 28% were present at low concentrations. No interferences were observed at concentrations of 4 g/l hemoglobin, 800 mg/l bilirubin and 8 g/l triglycerides. Method comparison study demonstrated an excellent correlation with both reference methods (r = 0.98 for ABX Pentra 400; 0.99 for AU 5800), though revealing a proportional bias of 19.7% (ABX Pentra 400) and 10.7% (AU 5800) respectively. TE(obs) was 26.7–31.9% and 16.7–21.9% and thus < TE(min). Healthy dogs presented with CRP values ≤11.9 mg/l. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT precisely detects canine CRP at clinically relevant moderate and high CRP concentrations. The assay correlates well with both reference methods. Due to the bias, however, follow-up examinations should be performed with the same assay and analyzer. BioMed Central 2018-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5859731/ /pubmed/29554960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1415-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hindenberg, Sarah
Keßler, Melanie
Zielinsky, Sabine
Langenstein, Judith
Moritz, Andreas
Bauer, Natali
Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title_full Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title_short Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein
title_sort evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for c-reactive protein
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29554960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1415-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hindenbergsarah evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein
AT keßlermelanie evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein
AT zielinskysabine evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein
AT langensteinjudith evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein
AT moritzandreas evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein
AT bauernatali evaluationofanovelquantitativecaninespeciesspecificpointofcareassayforcreactiveprotein