Cargando…

Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome

Objective: To classify the infants into 9 blocks based on the deviation of both placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z score and compared the incident rate of perinatal death in each of the small for date (SFD) vs. appropriate for date (AFD) vs. heavy for date (HFD) groups. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Yoshio, Itoh, Toshiya, Itoh, Hiroaki, Ogawa, Masaki, Sasaki, Kemal, Kanayama, Naohiro, Matsubara, Shigeki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29559837
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.23107
_version_ 1783307892436238336
author Matsuda, Yoshio
Itoh, Toshiya
Itoh, Hiroaki
Ogawa, Masaki
Sasaki, Kemal
Kanayama, Naohiro
Matsubara, Shigeki
author_facet Matsuda, Yoshio
Itoh, Toshiya
Itoh, Hiroaki
Ogawa, Masaki
Sasaki, Kemal
Kanayama, Naohiro
Matsubara, Shigeki
author_sort Matsuda, Yoshio
collection PubMed
description Objective: To classify the infants into 9 blocks based on the deviation of both placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z score and compared the incident rate of perinatal death in each of the small for date (SFD) vs. appropriate for date (AFD) vs. heavy for date (HFD) groups. Methods: The study population consisted of 93,034 placentas/infants from women who vaginally delivered a singleton infant. They were classified into 3 groups according to infants' weight: SFD (n=3,379), AFD (n=81,143) and HFD (n=8,512). The population was classified into 9 blocks according to the combination of i) low vs. middle vs. high placental weight (PW: a sex-, parity- and gestational-age-specific placental weight) and ii) low vs. middle vs. high F/P. In both i) and ii), ± 1.28 standard deviations in the in the Z scores was used for classifying low vs. middle vs. high, with 3x3 making 9 blocks. We then determined whether or not the perinatal death in each block differed among the three groups (SFD vs. AFD vs. HFD). Results: (1) The proportions of 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' (appropriate PW and F/P based on Z-score) were 37.6% in the SFD group, 78.8% in the AFD group, and 51.2% in HFD group. (2) The proportion of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' in the SFD group and that of 'inappropriately light placenta' in the HFD group were 0.3 and 0.4%, respectively, a very rare phenomenon. The proportions of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' and 'inappropriately light placenta' accounted for 4.1 and 5.5% in AFD group, respectively. (3) The rates of perinatal death in those with 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' were lowest in the SFD and AFD groups. Conclusion: By showing the fact that perinatal death was lowest in cases with balanced fetal/ placental growth, we conclude that 9-block categorization of PW and F/P based on deviation in the Z-score may be a candidate factor employable for understanding fetal and placental growth and perinatal deaths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58597712018-03-20 Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome Matsuda, Yoshio Itoh, Toshiya Itoh, Hiroaki Ogawa, Masaki Sasaki, Kemal Kanayama, Naohiro Matsubara, Shigeki Int J Med Sci Research Paper Objective: To classify the infants into 9 blocks based on the deviation of both placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z score and compared the incident rate of perinatal death in each of the small for date (SFD) vs. appropriate for date (AFD) vs. heavy for date (HFD) groups. Methods: The study population consisted of 93,034 placentas/infants from women who vaginally delivered a singleton infant. They were classified into 3 groups according to infants' weight: SFD (n=3,379), AFD (n=81,143) and HFD (n=8,512). The population was classified into 9 blocks according to the combination of i) low vs. middle vs. high placental weight (PW: a sex-, parity- and gestational-age-specific placental weight) and ii) low vs. middle vs. high F/P. In both i) and ii), ± 1.28 standard deviations in the in the Z scores was used for classifying low vs. middle vs. high, with 3x3 making 9 blocks. We then determined whether or not the perinatal death in each block differed among the three groups (SFD vs. AFD vs. HFD). Results: (1) The proportions of 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' (appropriate PW and F/P based on Z-score) were 37.6% in the SFD group, 78.8% in the AFD group, and 51.2% in HFD group. (2) The proportion of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' in the SFD group and that of 'inappropriately light placenta' in the HFD group were 0.3 and 0.4%, respectively, a very rare phenomenon. The proportions of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' and 'inappropriately light placenta' accounted for 4.1 and 5.5% in AFD group, respectively. (3) The rates of perinatal death in those with 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' were lowest in the SFD and AFD groups. Conclusion: By showing the fact that perinatal death was lowest in cases with balanced fetal/ placental growth, we conclude that 9-block categorization of PW and F/P based on deviation in the Z-score may be a candidate factor employable for understanding fetal and placental growth and perinatal deaths. Ivyspring International Publisher 2018-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5859771/ /pubmed/29559837 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.23107 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Matsuda, Yoshio
Itoh, Toshiya
Itoh, Hiroaki
Ogawa, Masaki
Sasaki, Kemal
Kanayama, Naohiro
Matsubara, Shigeki
Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title_full Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title_fullStr Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title_full_unstemmed Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title_short Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
title_sort impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29559837
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.23107
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudayoshio impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT itohtoshiya impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT itohhiroaki impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT ogawamasaki impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT sasakikemal impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT kanayamanaohiro impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome
AT matsubarashigeki impactofplacentalweightandfetalplacentalweightratiozscoreonfetalgrowthandtheperinataloutcome