Cargando…
Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for resection of large superficial gastric lesions (SGLs). METHODS: The clinicopathological records of patients performed with ESTD or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for SGLs between January 2012 and J...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1419369 |
_version_ | 1783307898570407936 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Xiuxue Linghu, Enqiang Chai, Ningli Lu, Zhongsheng Wang, Xiangdong Tang, Ping Meng, Jiangyun Du, Hong Wang, Hongbin |
author_facet | Feng, Xiuxue Linghu, Enqiang Chai, Ningli Lu, Zhongsheng Wang, Xiangdong Tang, Ping Meng, Jiangyun Du, Hong Wang, Hongbin |
author_sort | Feng, Xiuxue |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for resection of large superficial gastric lesions (SGLs). METHODS: The clinicopathological records of patients performed with ESTD or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for SGLs between January 2012 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. 7 cases undergoing ESTD were enrolled to form the ESTD group. The cases were individually matched at a 1 : 1 ratio to other patients performed with ESD according to lesion location, ulcer or scar findings, resected specimen area, operation time and operators, and the matched cases constituting the ESD group. The treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean specimen size was 46 mm. 10 lesions were located in the cardia and 4 lesions in the lesser curvature of the lower gastric body. En bloc resection was achieved for all lesions. The mean ESTD resection time was 69 minutes as against 87.7 minutes for the ESD (P = 0.01). The mean resection speed was faster for ESTD than for ESD (18.86 mm(2)/min versus 13.76 mm(2)/min, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences regarding the safety and curability during the endoscopic follow-up (mean 27 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESTD is effective and safe for the removal of SGLs and appears to be an optimal option for patients with large SGLs at suitable sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5859796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58597962018-04-24 Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study Feng, Xiuxue Linghu, Enqiang Chai, Ningli Lu, Zhongsheng Wang, Xiangdong Tang, Ping Meng, Jiangyun Du, Hong Wang, Hongbin Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for resection of large superficial gastric lesions (SGLs). METHODS: The clinicopathological records of patients performed with ESTD or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for SGLs between January 2012 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. 7 cases undergoing ESTD were enrolled to form the ESTD group. The cases were individually matched at a 1 : 1 ratio to other patients performed with ESD according to lesion location, ulcer or scar findings, resected specimen area, operation time and operators, and the matched cases constituting the ESD group. The treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean specimen size was 46 mm. 10 lesions were located in the cardia and 4 lesions in the lesser curvature of the lower gastric body. En bloc resection was achieved for all lesions. The mean ESTD resection time was 69 minutes as against 87.7 minutes for the ESD (P = 0.01). The mean resection speed was faster for ESTD than for ESD (18.86 mm(2)/min versus 13.76 mm(2)/min, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences regarding the safety and curability during the endoscopic follow-up (mean 27 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESTD is effective and safe for the removal of SGLs and appears to be an optimal option for patients with large SGLs at suitable sites. Hindawi 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5859796/ /pubmed/29692806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1419369 Text en Copyright © 2018 Xiuxue Feng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Feng, Xiuxue Linghu, Enqiang Chai, Ningli Lu, Zhongsheng Wang, Xiangdong Tang, Ping Meng, Jiangyun Du, Hong Wang, Hongbin Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title | Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title_full | Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title_short | Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study |
title_sort | endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large gastric neoplastic lesions: a case-matched controlled study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1419369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengxiuxue endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT linghuenqiang endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT chainingli endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT luzhongsheng endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT wangxiangdong endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT tangping endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT mengjiangyun endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT duhong endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy AT wanghongbin endoscopicsubmucosaltunneldissectionforlargegastricneoplasticlesionsacasematchedcontrolledstudy |