Cargando…

Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain carries a considerable risk of becoming persistent; hence aggressive preventive approaches are advocated. Persistently high prevalence of postoperative pain, however, suggests anesthesiologists underuse these strategies. A prospective cross-sectional study of patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Stephen, Guest, Charlotte, Goodall, Ian, Bantel, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588614
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153857
_version_ 1783307924180828160
author Ward, Stephen
Guest, Charlotte
Goodall, Ian
Bantel, Carsten
author_facet Ward, Stephen
Guest, Charlotte
Goodall, Ian
Bantel, Carsten
author_sort Ward, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain carries a considerable risk of becoming persistent; hence aggressive preventive approaches are advocated. Persistently high prevalence of postoperative pain, however, suggests anesthesiologists underuse these strategies. A prospective cross-sectional study of patients in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) and a survey of anesthesiologists were thus conducted to evaluate practice and uncover bias in intraoperative pain management. METHODS: Notes of PACU patients were reviewed and information regarding surgical context, comorbidities, and analgesic administration was retrieved. Variables were analyzed for their predictive properties on pain and intraoperative analgesic management. Furthermore, clinical dose–effect estimates for intraoperative morphine were determined. Finally, anesthesiologists completed a questionnaire comprising statements regarding pain relating to surgical context and morphine administration. RESULTS: Data of 200 patients and 55 anesthesiologists were analyzed. Prevalence of pain in PACU was 28% and was predicted by local anesthetic (LA) and low-dose morphine administration. Additionally, when LA was used, little coanalgesics were employed. These results suggest a restrained approach by anesthesiologists toward intraoperative pain management. It is supported by their reluctance to administer more than 10 mg morphine, despite these individuals regarding this practice as insufficient. The hesitancy toward morphine also transpired in the dose–effect estimates with the average applied dose operating on an ED(63) instead of an ED(95) level. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed a high prevalence of pain in PACU. It also indicated conservative intraoperative analgesic administration by anesthesiologists. The modest morphine usage and overreliance on LA application, which are not supported by published evidence, additionally suggest bias in current intraoperative pain management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58599062018-03-27 Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists Ward, Stephen Guest, Charlotte Goodall, Ian Bantel, Carsten J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain carries a considerable risk of becoming persistent; hence aggressive preventive approaches are advocated. Persistently high prevalence of postoperative pain, however, suggests anesthesiologists underuse these strategies. A prospective cross-sectional study of patients in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) and a survey of anesthesiologists were thus conducted to evaluate practice and uncover bias in intraoperative pain management. METHODS: Notes of PACU patients were reviewed and information regarding surgical context, comorbidities, and analgesic administration was retrieved. Variables were analyzed for their predictive properties on pain and intraoperative analgesic management. Furthermore, clinical dose–effect estimates for intraoperative morphine were determined. Finally, anesthesiologists completed a questionnaire comprising statements regarding pain relating to surgical context and morphine administration. RESULTS: Data of 200 patients and 55 anesthesiologists were analyzed. Prevalence of pain in PACU was 28% and was predicted by local anesthetic (LA) and low-dose morphine administration. Additionally, when LA was used, little coanalgesics were employed. These results suggest a restrained approach by anesthesiologists toward intraoperative pain management. It is supported by their reluctance to administer more than 10 mg morphine, despite these individuals regarding this practice as insufficient. The hesitancy toward morphine also transpired in the dose–effect estimates with the average applied dose operating on an ED(63) instead of an ED(95) level. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed a high prevalence of pain in PACU. It also indicated conservative intraoperative analgesic administration by anesthesiologists. The modest morphine usage and overreliance on LA application, which are not supported by published evidence, additionally suggest bias in current intraoperative pain management. Dove Medical Press 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5859906/ /pubmed/29588614 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153857 Text en © 2018 Ward et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ward, Stephen
Guest, Charlotte
Goodall, Ian
Bantel, Carsten
Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title_full Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title_fullStr Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title_full_unstemmed Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title_short Practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
title_sort practice and bias in intraoperative pain management: results of a cross-sectional patient study and a survey of anesthesiologists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588614
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153857
work_keys_str_mv AT wardstephen practiceandbiasinintraoperativepainmanagementresultsofacrosssectionalpatientstudyandasurveyofanesthesiologists
AT guestcharlotte practiceandbiasinintraoperativepainmanagementresultsofacrosssectionalpatientstudyandasurveyofanesthesiologists
AT goodallian practiceandbiasinintraoperativepainmanagementresultsofacrosssectionalpatientstudyandasurveyofanesthesiologists
AT bantelcarsten practiceandbiasinintraoperativepainmanagementresultsofacrosssectionalpatientstudyandasurveyofanesthesiologists