Cargando…

Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation

BACKGROUND: older patients admitted to hospitals are at risk for hospital-acquired morbidity related to immobility. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate an evidence-based intervention targeting staff to promote early mobilisation in older patients admitted to general medical inpatient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Barbara, Moore, Julia E, Almaawiy, Ummukulthum, Chan, Wai-Hin, Khan, Sobia, Ewusie, Joycelyne, Hamid, Jemila S, Straus, Sharon E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx128
_version_ 1783307933905321984
author Liu, Barbara
Moore, Julia E
Almaawiy, Ummukulthum
Chan, Wai-Hin
Khan, Sobia
Ewusie, Joycelyne
Hamid, Jemila S
Straus, Sharon E
author_facet Liu, Barbara
Moore, Julia E
Almaawiy, Ummukulthum
Chan, Wai-Hin
Khan, Sobia
Ewusie, Joycelyne
Hamid, Jemila S
Straus, Sharon E
author_sort Liu, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: older patients admitted to hospitals are at risk for hospital-acquired morbidity related to immobility. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate an evidence-based intervention targeting staff to promote early mobilisation in older patients admitted to general medical inpatient units. METHODS: the early mobilisation implementation intervention for staff was multi-component and tailored to local context at 14 academic hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was patient mobilisation. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, falls and functional status. The targeted patients were aged ≥ 65 years and admitted between January 2012 and December 2013. The intervention was evaluated over three time periods—pre-intervention, during and post-intervention using an interrupted time series design. RESULTS: in total, 12,490 patients (mean age 80.0 years [standard deviation 8.36]) were included in the overall analysis. An increase in mobilisation was observed post-intervention, where significantly more patients were out of bed daily (intercept difference = 10.56%, 95% CI: [4.94, 16.18]; P < 0.001) post-intervention compared to pre-intervention. Hospital median LOS was significantly shorter during the intervention period (intercept difference = −3.45 days, 95% CI: [−6.67,−0.23], P = 0.0356) compared to pre-intervention. It continued to decrease post-intervention with significantly fewer days in hospital (intercept difference= −6.1, 95% CI: [−11,−1.2]; P = 0.015) in the post-intervention period compared to pre-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: this is a large-scale study evaluating an implementation strategy for early mobilisation in older, general medical inpatients. The positive outcome of this simple intervention on an important functional goal of getting more patients out of bed is a striking success for improving care for hospitalised older patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5859974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58599742018-03-23 Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation Liu, Barbara Moore, Julia E Almaawiy, Ummukulthum Chan, Wai-Hin Khan, Sobia Ewusie, Joycelyne Hamid, Jemila S Straus, Sharon E Age Ageing Research Paper BACKGROUND: older patients admitted to hospitals are at risk for hospital-acquired morbidity related to immobility. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate an evidence-based intervention targeting staff to promote early mobilisation in older patients admitted to general medical inpatient units. METHODS: the early mobilisation implementation intervention for staff was multi-component and tailored to local context at 14 academic hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was patient mobilisation. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, falls and functional status. The targeted patients were aged ≥ 65 years and admitted between January 2012 and December 2013. The intervention was evaluated over three time periods—pre-intervention, during and post-intervention using an interrupted time series design. RESULTS: in total, 12,490 patients (mean age 80.0 years [standard deviation 8.36]) were included in the overall analysis. An increase in mobilisation was observed post-intervention, where significantly more patients were out of bed daily (intercept difference = 10.56%, 95% CI: [4.94, 16.18]; P < 0.001) post-intervention compared to pre-intervention. Hospital median LOS was significantly shorter during the intervention period (intercept difference = −3.45 days, 95% CI: [−6.67,−0.23], P = 0.0356) compared to pre-intervention. It continued to decrease post-intervention with significantly fewer days in hospital (intercept difference= −6.1, 95% CI: [−11,−1.2]; P = 0.015) in the post-intervention period compared to pre-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: this is a large-scale study evaluating an implementation strategy for early mobilisation in older, general medical inpatients. The positive outcome of this simple intervention on an important functional goal of getting more patients out of bed is a striking success for improving care for hospitalised older patients. Oxford University Press 2018-01 2017-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5859974/ /pubmed/28985310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx128 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Paper
Liu, Barbara
Moore, Julia E
Almaawiy, Ummukulthum
Chan, Wai-Hin
Khan, Sobia
Ewusie, Joycelyne
Hamid, Jemila S
Straus, Sharon E
Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title_full Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title_fullStr Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title_short Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
title_sort outcomes of mobilisation of vulnerable elders in ontario (move on): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5859974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx128
work_keys_str_mv AT liubarbara outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT moorejuliae outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT almaawiyummukulthum outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT chanwaihin outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT khansobia outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT ewusiejoycelyne outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT hamidjemilas outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT straussharone outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation
AT outcomesofmobilisationofvulnerableeldersinontariomoveonamultisiteinterruptedtimeseriesevaluationofanimplementationinterventiontoincreasepatientmobilisation