Cargando…
Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673 |
_version_ | 1783307993844023296 |
---|---|
author | Jara-Palomares, Luis Otero, Remedios Jimenez, David Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel Font, Carme Falga, Conxita Soler, Silvia Riesco, David Verhamme, Peter Monreal, Manuel |
author_facet | Jara-Palomares, Luis Otero, Remedios Jimenez, David Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel Font, Carme Falga, Conxita Soler, Silvia Riesco, David Verhamme, Peter Monreal, Manuel |
author_sort | Jara-Palomares, Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with unprovoked VTE at increased risk for cancer. We dichotomized patients as having low- (≤2 points) or high (≥3 points) risk for cancer, and tried to validate the score at 12 and 24 months. From January 2014 to October 2016, 11,695 VTE patients were recruited. Of these, 1,360 with unprovoked VTE (11.6%) were eligible for the study. At 12 months, 52 patients (3.8%; 95%CI: 2.9–5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients (67%) scoring ≤2 points, 22 (2.4%) had cancer. Among 455 scoring ≥3 points, 30 (6.6%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.8; 95%CI 1.6–5; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.63 (95%CI 0.55–0.71). At 24 months, 58 patients (4.3%; 95%CI: 3.3–5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients scoring ≤2 points, 26 (2.9%) had cancer. Among 455 patients scoring ≥3 points, 32 (7%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.6; 95%CI 1.5–4.3; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.61 (95%CI, 0.54–0.69). We validated our prognostic score at 12 and 24 months, although prospective cohort validation is needed. This may help to identify patients for whom more extensive screening workup may be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5860754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58607542018-03-28 Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism Jara-Palomares, Luis Otero, Remedios Jimenez, David Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel Font, Carme Falga, Conxita Soler, Silvia Riesco, David Verhamme, Peter Monreal, Manuel PLoS One Research Article The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with unprovoked VTE at increased risk for cancer. We dichotomized patients as having low- (≤2 points) or high (≥3 points) risk for cancer, and tried to validate the score at 12 and 24 months. From January 2014 to October 2016, 11,695 VTE patients were recruited. Of these, 1,360 with unprovoked VTE (11.6%) were eligible for the study. At 12 months, 52 patients (3.8%; 95%CI: 2.9–5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients (67%) scoring ≤2 points, 22 (2.4%) had cancer. Among 455 scoring ≥3 points, 30 (6.6%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.8; 95%CI 1.6–5; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.63 (95%CI 0.55–0.71). At 24 months, 58 patients (4.3%; 95%CI: 3.3–5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients scoring ≤2 points, 26 (2.9%) had cancer. Among 455 patients scoring ≥3 points, 32 (7%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.6; 95%CI 1.5–4.3; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.61 (95%CI, 0.54–0.69). We validated our prognostic score at 12 and 24 months, although prospective cohort validation is needed. This may help to identify patients for whom more extensive screening workup may be required. Public Library of Science 2018-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5860754/ /pubmed/29558509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673 Text en © 2018 Jara-Palomares et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jara-Palomares, Luis Otero, Remedios Jimenez, David Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel Font, Carme Falga, Conxita Soler, Silvia Riesco, David Verhamme, Peter Monreal, Manuel Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title | Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title_full | Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title_fullStr | Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title_short | Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
title_sort | validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarapalomaresluis validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT oteroremedios validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT jimenezdavid validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT praenafernandezjuanmanuel validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT fontcarme validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT falgaconxita validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT solersilvia validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT riescodavid validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT verhammepeter validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT monrealmanuel validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism AT validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism |