Cargando…

Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism

The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jara-Palomares, Luis, Otero, Remedios, Jimenez, David, Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel, Font, Carme, Falga, Conxita, Soler, Silvia, Riesco, David, Verhamme, Peter, Monreal, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673
_version_ 1783307993844023296
author Jara-Palomares, Luis
Otero, Remedios
Jimenez, David
Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel
Font, Carme
Falga, Conxita
Soler, Silvia
Riesco, David
Verhamme, Peter
Monreal, Manuel
author_facet Jara-Palomares, Luis
Otero, Remedios
Jimenez, David
Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel
Font, Carme
Falga, Conxita
Soler, Silvia
Riesco, David
Verhamme, Peter
Monreal, Manuel
author_sort Jara-Palomares, Luis
collection PubMed
description The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with unprovoked VTE at increased risk for cancer. We dichotomized patients as having low- (≤2 points) or high (≥3 points) risk for cancer, and tried to validate the score at 12 and 24 months. From January 2014 to October 2016, 11,695 VTE patients were recruited. Of these, 1,360 with unprovoked VTE (11.6%) were eligible for the study. At 12 months, 52 patients (3.8%; 95%CI: 2.9–5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients (67%) scoring ≤2 points, 22 (2.4%) had cancer. Among 455 scoring ≥3 points, 30 (6.6%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.8; 95%CI 1.6–5; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.63 (95%CI 0.55–0.71). At 24 months, 58 patients (4.3%; 95%CI: 3.3–5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients scoring ≤2 points, 26 (2.9%) had cancer. Among 455 patients scoring ≥3 points, 32 (7%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.6; 95%CI 1.5–4.3; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.61 (95%CI, 0.54–0.69). We validated our prognostic score at 12 and 24 months, although prospective cohort validation is needed. This may help to identify patients for whom more extensive screening workup may be required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5860754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58607542018-03-28 Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism Jara-Palomares, Luis Otero, Remedios Jimenez, David Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel Font, Carme Falga, Conxita Soler, Silvia Riesco, David Verhamme, Peter Monreal, Manuel PLoS One Research Article The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with unprovoked VTE at increased risk for cancer. We dichotomized patients as having low- (≤2 points) or high (≥3 points) risk for cancer, and tried to validate the score at 12 and 24 months. From January 2014 to October 2016, 11,695 VTE patients were recruited. Of these, 1,360 with unprovoked VTE (11.6%) were eligible for the study. At 12 months, 52 patients (3.8%; 95%CI: 2.9–5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients (67%) scoring ≤2 points, 22 (2.4%) had cancer. Among 455 scoring ≥3 points, 30 (6.6%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.8; 95%CI 1.6–5; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.63 (95%CI 0.55–0.71). At 24 months, 58 patients (4.3%; 95%CI: 3.3–5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients scoring ≤2 points, 26 (2.9%) had cancer. Among 455 patients scoring ≥3 points, 32 (7%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.6; 95%CI 1.5–4.3; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.61 (95%CI, 0.54–0.69). We validated our prognostic score at 12 and 24 months, although prospective cohort validation is needed. This may help to identify patients for whom more extensive screening workup may be required. Public Library of Science 2018-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5860754/ /pubmed/29558509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673 Text en © 2018 Jara-Palomares et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jara-Palomares, Luis
Otero, Remedios
Jimenez, David
Praena-Fernandez, Juan Manuel
Font, Carme
Falga, Conxita
Soler, Silvia
Riesco, David
Verhamme, Peter
Monreal, Manuel
Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title_full Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title_fullStr Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title_short Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
title_sort validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194673
work_keys_str_mv AT jarapalomaresluis validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT oteroremedios validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT jimenezdavid validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT praenafernandezjuanmanuel validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT fontcarme validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT falgaconxita validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT solersilvia validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT riescodavid validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT verhammepeter validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT monrealmanuel validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism
AT validationofaprognosticscoreforhiddencancerinunprovokedvenousthromboembolism