Cargando…

Prognostic value of baseline, interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A meta-analysis

The prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is currently controversial. Furthermore, whether the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongxi, Shen, Guohua, Jiang, Chong, Li, Li, Cui, Futao, Tian, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194435
Descripción
Sumario:The prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is currently controversial. Furthermore, whether the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and Deauville 5-point scale (DS) acquired from PET/CT are predictors of prognosis in ENKTL remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between baseline, interim and end-of-treatment PET/CT (B-PET/CT, I-PET/CT and E-PET/CT) parameters and ENKTL prognosis. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Medline databases for eligible articles. SUV(max), MTV, and TLG on B-PET/CT, DS on I-PET/CT and DS on E-PET/CT were regarded as efficacy data. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Nine trials with a total of 535 ENKTL patients were included. SUV(max), MTV and TLG on B-PET/CT were significantly associated with PFS with HRs of 2.78 (95%CI 1.54–5.03), 3.61 (95%CI 1.96–6.65) and 5.62 (95%CI 1.94–16.33), respectively, and with OS with HRs of 4.78 (95%CI 2.29–9.96), 3.20 (95%CI 1.55–6.60) and 7.76 (95%CI 1.79–33.58), respectively. For the DS on I-PET/CT, the HRs for PFS and OS were 5.15 (95%CI 2.71–9.80) and 5.80 (95%CI 2.28–14.73), respectively. Similarly, the DS on E-PET/CT was a significant predictor of PFS and OS with HRs of 3.65 (95%CI 2.13–6.26) and 3.32 (95%CI 1.79–6.15), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SUV(max), MTV, TLG on B-PET/CT, DS on I-PET/CT and DS on E-PET/CT may be significant prognostic indicators for PFS and OS in ENKTL patients. Moreover, TLG tends to be superior to SUV(max) and MTV on B-PET/CT for predicting survival of ENKTL patients. Therefore, response monitoring and prognostication assessments based on multiple PET/CT parameters should be considered in the management of ENKTL patients.