Cargando…
Biomarkers in active surveillance
The use of active surveillance (AS) is increasing for favorable-risk prostate cancer. However, there remain challenges in patient selection for AS, due to the limitations of current clinical staging. In addition, monitoring protocols relying on serial biopsies is invasive and presents risks such as...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5861276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594029 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.12.26 |
_version_ | 1783308062802575360 |
---|---|
author | Loeb, Stacy Tosoian, Jeffrey J. |
author_facet | Loeb, Stacy Tosoian, Jeffrey J. |
author_sort | Loeb, Stacy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of active surveillance (AS) is increasing for favorable-risk prostate cancer. However, there remain challenges in patient selection for AS, due to the limitations of current clinical staging. In addition, monitoring protocols relying on serial biopsies is invasive and presents risks such as infection. For these reasons, there is substantial interest in identifying markers that can be used to improve AS selection and monitoring. In this article, we review the evidence on serum, urine and tissue markers in AS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5861276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58612762018-03-28 Biomarkers in active surveillance Loeb, Stacy Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Transl Androl Urol Review Article The use of active surveillance (AS) is increasing for favorable-risk prostate cancer. However, there remain challenges in patient selection for AS, due to the limitations of current clinical staging. In addition, monitoring protocols relying on serial biopsies is invasive and presents risks such as infection. For these reasons, there is substantial interest in identifying markers that can be used to improve AS selection and monitoring. In this article, we review the evidence on serum, urine and tissue markers in AS. AME Publishing Company 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5861276/ /pubmed/29594029 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.12.26 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Loeb, Stacy Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title | Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title_full | Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title_fullStr | Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title_short | Biomarkers in active surveillance |
title_sort | biomarkers in active surveillance |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5861276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594029 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.12.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loebstacy biomarkersinactivesurveillance AT tosoianjeffreyj biomarkersinactivesurveillance |