Cargando…

The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China

Background: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. Influenza vaccine is an important influenza prevention strategy and the preparations used display good safety and tolerability profiles. But the safety of applying influenza vaccine on the clinical cured lepro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yi, Chen, Li, Zou, Jie, Zhu, Zheng-Gang, Zhu, Li, Wan, Jing, Hu, Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5861811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29087761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1390638
_version_ 1783308147307315200
author Zheng, Yi
Chen, Li
Zou, Jie
Zhu, Zheng-Gang
Zhu, Li
Wan, Jing
Hu, Quan
author_facet Zheng, Yi
Chen, Li
Zou, Jie
Zhu, Zheng-Gang
Zhu, Li
Wan, Jing
Hu, Quan
author_sort Zheng, Yi
collection PubMed
description Background: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. Influenza vaccine is an important influenza prevention strategy and the preparations used display good safety and tolerability profiles. But the safety of applying influenza vaccine on the clinical cured leprosy patients is unclear. Methods: We conducted an observational clinical study, in Wuhan between November 15, 2016 and March 1, 2017. Two groups of participants ≥50 years of age received a 0.5 ml dose of the inactivated split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine and a follow-up 28 days observation of any solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Results: A total of 134 subjects were included in the study. The total rate of reactogenicity was 5.4% [2/37] in leprosy group and 15.5% [15/ 97] in control group, the difference of reactogenicity between two groups was not significant (p = 0.1522). For solicited injection-sites adverse events (AEs), 12.4% [12/ 97] participants in the control group reported of itching, pain, erythema, swelling or induration, and no participants in leprosy group reported of any solicited injection-sites AEs. For solicited systemic AEs, 7.2% [7 / 97] participants in the control group reported of fever, malaise or headache, and 2.7% [1 / 37] participants in the leprosy group reported of fever, statistic result showed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.4438). Unsolicited AEs was reported by one male aged 76, 4 hours after vaccination administration, his plantar ulcer area began bleeding. All AEs were grade 1 or grade 2, and no recurrence of lepra reaction, AEs leading to early withdrawal from the study, or deaths were reported in this study. Conclusions: To our knowledge, the present study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients. We concluded that clinically cured leprosy patients are relatively safe for influenza vaccine. More importantly, our study make a positive and scientific efforts to eradicate discrimination on leprosy. In our study, we described a patient with plantar ulcer undergoing bleeding for 4 hours after vaccine administration. Based on evidence we have, we interpret that this adverse event may probably associated with vaccine, and patients with ulcer and leprosy need intensive attention after vaccines administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5861811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58618112018-03-26 The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China Zheng, Yi Chen, Li Zou, Jie Zhu, Zheng-Gang Zhu, Li Wan, Jing Hu, Quan Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper Background: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. Influenza vaccine is an important influenza prevention strategy and the preparations used display good safety and tolerability profiles. But the safety of applying influenza vaccine on the clinical cured leprosy patients is unclear. Methods: We conducted an observational clinical study, in Wuhan between November 15, 2016 and March 1, 2017. Two groups of participants ≥50 years of age received a 0.5 ml dose of the inactivated split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine and a follow-up 28 days observation of any solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Results: A total of 134 subjects were included in the study. The total rate of reactogenicity was 5.4% [2/37] in leprosy group and 15.5% [15/ 97] in control group, the difference of reactogenicity between two groups was not significant (p = 0.1522). For solicited injection-sites adverse events (AEs), 12.4% [12/ 97] participants in the control group reported of itching, pain, erythema, swelling or induration, and no participants in leprosy group reported of any solicited injection-sites AEs. For solicited systemic AEs, 7.2% [7 / 97] participants in the control group reported of fever, malaise or headache, and 2.7% [1 / 37] participants in the leprosy group reported of fever, statistic result showed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.4438). Unsolicited AEs was reported by one male aged 76, 4 hours after vaccination administration, his plantar ulcer area began bleeding. All AEs were grade 1 or grade 2, and no recurrence of lepra reaction, AEs leading to early withdrawal from the study, or deaths were reported in this study. Conclusions: To our knowledge, the present study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients. We concluded that clinically cured leprosy patients are relatively safe for influenza vaccine. More importantly, our study make a positive and scientific efforts to eradicate discrimination on leprosy. In our study, we described a patient with plantar ulcer undergoing bleeding for 4 hours after vaccine administration. Based on evidence we have, we interpret that this adverse event may probably associated with vaccine, and patients with ulcer and leprosy need intensive attention after vaccines administration. Taylor & Francis 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5861811/ /pubmed/29087761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1390638 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zheng, Yi
Chen, Li
Zou, Jie
Zhu, Zheng-Gang
Zhu, Li
Wan, Jing
Hu, Quan
The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title_full The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title_fullStr The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title_full_unstemmed The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title_short The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China
title_sort safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in china
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5861811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29087761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1390638
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyi thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT chenli thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zoujie thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zhuzhenggang thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zhuli thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT wanjing thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT huquan thesafetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zhengyi safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT chenli safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zoujie safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zhuzhenggang safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT zhuli safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT wanjing safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina
AT huquan safetyofinfluenzavaccineinclinicallycuredleprosypatientsinchina