Cargando…

Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM

The fluctuating granularity or “bee swarm” effect seen in highly defocussed transmission electron micrographs is caused by microscopic charge fluctuations in the specimen created by the illuminating beam. In the field of high-resolution single particle electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM), there has bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Christopher J., Henderson, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29413413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.011
_version_ 1783308269749534720
author Russo, Christopher J.
Henderson, Richard
author_facet Russo, Christopher J.
Henderson, Richard
author_sort Russo, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description The fluctuating granularity or “bee swarm” effect seen in highly defocussed transmission electron micrographs is caused by microscopic charge fluctuations in the specimen created by the illuminating beam. In the field of high-resolution single particle electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM), there has been a concern that this fluctuating charge might cause defocus-dependent Thon ring fading which would degrade the final image. In this paper, we have analysed the 2.35 Å fringes from the (111) reflection in images of gold nanoparticles embedded in amorphous ice. We show that there is a small, yet detectable amount of defocus-dependent blurring of the lattice fringes when compared with those from a pure gold foil. The transverse electric field associated with the fluctuating charges on the insulating frozen water specimen deflects the electron beam locally and causes image blurring. The perturbation is small, decreasing the amplitude of the 2.35 Å reflection at 10 µm defocus by about 7% (intensity by 14%). For smaller defocus values in the range 2–4 µm and for resolutions that are typical in cryoEM, the effects of source incoherence and the bee swarm effect are negligible for all reasonable cryoEM imaging conditions, assuming that a field emission gun (FEG) is used for illumination. This leaves physical movement of the specimen due to radiation damage as the outstanding problem and the major source of contrast loss in cryoEM micrographs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5862660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58626602018-04-01 Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM Russo, Christopher J. Henderson, Richard Ultramicroscopy Article The fluctuating granularity or “bee swarm” effect seen in highly defocussed transmission electron micrographs is caused by microscopic charge fluctuations in the specimen created by the illuminating beam. In the field of high-resolution single particle electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM), there has been a concern that this fluctuating charge might cause defocus-dependent Thon ring fading which would degrade the final image. In this paper, we have analysed the 2.35 Å fringes from the (111) reflection in images of gold nanoparticles embedded in amorphous ice. We show that there is a small, yet detectable amount of defocus-dependent blurring of the lattice fringes when compared with those from a pure gold foil. The transverse electric field associated with the fluctuating charges on the insulating frozen water specimen deflects the electron beam locally and causes image blurring. The perturbation is small, decreasing the amplitude of the 2.35 Å reflection at 10 µm defocus by about 7% (intensity by 14%). For smaller defocus values in the range 2–4 µm and for resolutions that are typical in cryoEM, the effects of source incoherence and the bee swarm effect are negligible for all reasonable cryoEM imaging conditions, assuming that a field emission gun (FEG) is used for illumination. This leaves physical movement of the specimen due to radiation damage as the outstanding problem and the major source of contrast loss in cryoEM micrographs. Elsevier 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5862660/ /pubmed/29413413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.011 Text en © 2018 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Russo, Christopher J.
Henderson, Richard
Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title_full Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title_fullStr Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title_full_unstemmed Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title_short Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM
title_sort microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoem
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29413413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.011
work_keys_str_mv AT russochristopherj microscopicchargefluctuationscauseminimalcontrastlossincryoem
AT hendersonrichard microscopicchargefluctuationscauseminimalcontrastlossincryoem