Cargando…
Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004 |
_version_ | 1783308271616000000 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Nicola S. Krul, Inge M. van Eggermond, Anna M. Aleman, Berthe M.P. Cooke, Rosie Kuiper, Susanne Allen, Steven D. Wallis, Matthew G. Llanas, Damien Diallo, Ibrahima de Vathaire, Florent Smith, Susan A. Hauptmann, Michael Broeks, Annegien Swerdlow, Anthony J. Van Leeuwen, Flora E. |
author_facet | Russell, Nicola S. Krul, Inge M. van Eggermond, Anna M. Aleman, Berthe M.P. Cooke, Rosie Kuiper, Susanne Allen, Steven D. Wallis, Matthew G. Llanas, Damien Diallo, Ibrahima de Vathaire, Florent Smith, Susan A. Hauptmann, Michael Broeks, Annegien Swerdlow, Anthony J. Van Leeuwen, Flora E. |
author_sort | Russell, Nicola S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to the site of the subsequent breast cancer is required. METHODS: For 174 Dutch and 170 UK female patients with breast cancer following HL treatment, the 3-dimensional position of the breast cancer in the affected breast was determined and transferred onto a CT-based anthropomorphic phantom. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system the dose distribution on the CT-based phantom was calculated for the 46 different radiation treatment field set-ups used in the study population. The estimated dose at the centre of the breast cancer, and a margin to reflect dose uncertainty were determined on the basis of the location of the tumour and the isodose lines from the treatment planning. We assessed inter-observer variation and for 47 patients we compared the results with a previously applied dosimetry method. RESULTS: The estimated median point dose at the centre of the breast cancer location was 29.75 Gy (IQR 5.8–37.2), or about 75% of the prescribed radiotherapy dose. The median dose uncertainty range was 5.97 Gy. We observed an excellent inter-observer variation (ICC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–0.95)). The absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-method variation was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.37–0.75), indicating (nearly) good agreement. There were no systematic differences in the dose estimates between observers or methods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the dose at the point of a subsequent breast cancer show good correlation between methods, but the retrospective nature of the estimates means that there is always some uncertainty to be accounted for. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5862668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58626682018-03-28 Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy Russell, Nicola S. Krul, Inge M. van Eggermond, Anna M. Aleman, Berthe M.P. Cooke, Rosie Kuiper, Susanne Allen, Steven D. Wallis, Matthew G. Llanas, Damien Diallo, Ibrahima de Vathaire, Florent Smith, Susan A. Hauptmann, Michael Broeks, Annegien Swerdlow, Anthony J. Van Leeuwen, Flora E. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to the site of the subsequent breast cancer is required. METHODS: For 174 Dutch and 170 UK female patients with breast cancer following HL treatment, the 3-dimensional position of the breast cancer in the affected breast was determined and transferred onto a CT-based anthropomorphic phantom. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system the dose distribution on the CT-based phantom was calculated for the 46 different radiation treatment field set-ups used in the study population. The estimated dose at the centre of the breast cancer, and a margin to reflect dose uncertainty were determined on the basis of the location of the tumour and the isodose lines from the treatment planning. We assessed inter-observer variation and for 47 patients we compared the results with a previously applied dosimetry method. RESULTS: The estimated median point dose at the centre of the breast cancer location was 29.75 Gy (IQR 5.8–37.2), or about 75% of the prescribed radiotherapy dose. The median dose uncertainty range was 5.97 Gy. We observed an excellent inter-observer variation (ICC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–0.95)). The absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-method variation was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.37–0.75), indicating (nearly) good agreement. There were no systematic differences in the dose estimates between observers or methods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the dose at the point of a subsequent breast cancer show good correlation between methods, but the retrospective nature of the estimates means that there is always some uncertainty to be accounted for. Elsevier 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5862668/ /pubmed/29594225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Russell, Nicola S. Krul, Inge M. van Eggermond, Anna M. Aleman, Berthe M.P. Cooke, Rosie Kuiper, Susanne Allen, Steven D. Wallis, Matthew G. Llanas, Damien Diallo, Ibrahima de Vathaire, Florent Smith, Susan A. Hauptmann, Michael Broeks, Annegien Swerdlow, Anthony J. Van Leeuwen, Flora E. Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title | Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title_full | Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title_short | Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
title_sort | retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellnicolas retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT krulingem retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT vaneggermondannam retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT alemanberthemp retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT cookerosie retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT kuipersusanne retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT allenstevend retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT wallismatthewg retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT llanasdamien retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT dialloibrahima retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT devathaireflorent retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT smithsusana retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT hauptmannmichael retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT broeksannegien retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT swerdlowanthonyj retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy AT vanleeuwenflorae retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy |