Cargando…

Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Nicola S., Krul, Inge M., van Eggermond, Anna M., Aleman, Berthe M.P., Cooke, Rosie, Kuiper, Susanne, Allen, Steven D., Wallis, Matthew G., Llanas, Damien, Diallo, Ibrahima, de Vathaire, Florent, Smith, Susan A., Hauptmann, Michael, Broeks, Annegien, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Van Leeuwen, Flora E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004
_version_ 1783308271616000000
author Russell, Nicola S.
Krul, Inge M.
van Eggermond, Anna M.
Aleman, Berthe M.P.
Cooke, Rosie
Kuiper, Susanne
Allen, Steven D.
Wallis, Matthew G.
Llanas, Damien
Diallo, Ibrahima
de Vathaire, Florent
Smith, Susan A.
Hauptmann, Michael
Broeks, Annegien
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Van Leeuwen, Flora E.
author_facet Russell, Nicola S.
Krul, Inge M.
van Eggermond, Anna M.
Aleman, Berthe M.P.
Cooke, Rosie
Kuiper, Susanne
Allen, Steven D.
Wallis, Matthew G.
Llanas, Damien
Diallo, Ibrahima
de Vathaire, Florent
Smith, Susan A.
Hauptmann, Michael
Broeks, Annegien
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Van Leeuwen, Flora E.
author_sort Russell, Nicola S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to the site of the subsequent breast cancer is required. METHODS: For 174 Dutch and 170 UK female patients with breast cancer following HL treatment, the 3-dimensional position of the breast cancer in the affected breast was determined and transferred onto a CT-based anthropomorphic phantom. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system the dose distribution on the CT-based phantom was calculated for the 46 different radiation treatment field set-ups used in the study population. The estimated dose at the centre of the breast cancer, and a margin to reflect dose uncertainty were determined on the basis of the location of the tumour and the isodose lines from the treatment planning. We assessed inter-observer variation and for 47 patients we compared the results with a previously applied dosimetry method. RESULTS: The estimated median point dose at the centre of the breast cancer location was 29.75 Gy (IQR 5.8–37.2), or about 75% of the prescribed radiotherapy dose. The median dose uncertainty range was 5.97 Gy. We observed an excellent inter-observer variation (ICC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–0.95)). The absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-method variation was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.37–0.75), indicating (nearly) good agreement. There were no systematic differences in the dose estimates between observers or methods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the dose at the point of a subsequent breast cancer show good correlation between methods, but the retrospective nature of the estimates means that there is always some uncertainty to be accounted for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5862668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58626682018-03-28 Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy Russell, Nicola S. Krul, Inge M. van Eggermond, Anna M. Aleman, Berthe M.P. Cooke, Rosie Kuiper, Susanne Allen, Steven D. Wallis, Matthew G. Llanas, Damien Diallo, Ibrahima de Vathaire, Florent Smith, Susan A. Hauptmann, Michael Broeks, Annegien Swerdlow, Anthony J. Van Leeuwen, Flora E. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose–response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to the site of the subsequent breast cancer is required. METHODS: For 174 Dutch and 170 UK female patients with breast cancer following HL treatment, the 3-dimensional position of the breast cancer in the affected breast was determined and transferred onto a CT-based anthropomorphic phantom. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system the dose distribution on the CT-based phantom was calculated for the 46 different radiation treatment field set-ups used in the study population. The estimated dose at the centre of the breast cancer, and a margin to reflect dose uncertainty were determined on the basis of the location of the tumour and the isodose lines from the treatment planning. We assessed inter-observer variation and for 47 patients we compared the results with a previously applied dosimetry method. RESULTS: The estimated median point dose at the centre of the breast cancer location was 29.75 Gy (IQR 5.8–37.2), or about 75% of the prescribed radiotherapy dose. The median dose uncertainty range was 5.97 Gy. We observed an excellent inter-observer variation (ICC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–0.95)). The absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-method variation was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.37–0.75), indicating (nearly) good agreement. There were no systematic differences in the dose estimates between observers or methods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the dose at the point of a subsequent breast cancer show good correlation between methods, but the retrospective nature of the estimates means that there is always some uncertainty to be accounted for. Elsevier 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5862668/ /pubmed/29594225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Russell, Nicola S.
Krul, Inge M.
van Eggermond, Anna M.
Aleman, Berthe M.P.
Cooke, Rosie
Kuiper, Susanne
Allen, Steven D.
Wallis, Matthew G.
Llanas, Damien
Diallo, Ibrahima
de Vathaire, Florent
Smith, Susan A.
Hauptmann, Michael
Broeks, Annegien
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Van Leeuwen, Flora E.
Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title_full Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title_fullStr Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title_short Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
title_sort retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT russellnicolas retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT krulingem retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT vaneggermondannam retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT alemanberthemp retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT cookerosie retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT kuipersusanne retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT allenstevend retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT wallismatthewg retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT llanasdamien retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT dialloibrahima retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT devathaireflorent retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT smithsusana retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT hauptmannmichael retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT broeksannegien retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT swerdlowanthonyj retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy
AT vanleeuwenflorae retrospectivemethodstoestimateradiationdoseatthesiteofbreastcancerdevelopmentafterhodgkinlymphomaradiotherapy