Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?

This review article on the current management for calcaneal fractures discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options including the problems encountered. Controversies are described and the evidence reviewed. The management of some types of displaced intra-articular calcane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razik, Aisha, Harris, Mark, Trompeter, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2017
Materias:
Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-017-0297-3
_version_ 1783308277347516416
author Razik, Aisha
Harris, Mark
Trompeter, Alex
author_facet Razik, Aisha
Harris, Mark
Trompeter, Alex
author_sort Razik, Aisha
collection PubMed
description This review article on the current management for calcaneal fractures discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options including the problems encountered. Controversies are described and the evidence reviewed. The management of some types of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains contentious; is there a preferred stabilisation method for each type of calcaneal fracture? How constant is the “constant fragment” in an intra-articular calcaneal fracture and what is the evidence for primary arthrodesis and what is its place in these fractures?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5862705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58627052018-03-23 Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now? Razik, Aisha Harris, Mark Trompeter, Alex Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Review This review article on the current management for calcaneal fractures discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options including the problems encountered. Controversies are described and the evidence reviewed. The management of some types of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains contentious; is there a preferred stabilisation method for each type of calcaneal fracture? How constant is the “constant fragment” in an intra-articular calcaneal fracture and what is the evidence for primary arthrodesis and what is its place in these fractures? Springer Milan 2017-10-20 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5862705/ /pubmed/29052080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-017-0297-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Razik, Aisha
Harris, Mark
Trompeter, Alex
Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title_full Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title_fullStr Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title_full_unstemmed Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title_short Calcaneal fractures: Where are we now?
title_sort calcaneal fractures: where are we now?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-017-0297-3
work_keys_str_mv AT razikaisha calcanealfractureswherearewenow
AT harrismark calcanealfractureswherearewenow
AT trompeteralex calcanealfractureswherearewenow

Ejemplares similares