Cargando…
Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9 |
_version_ | 1783308316844228608 |
---|---|
author | Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, K. Uotila, J. |
author_facet | Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, K. Uotila, J. |
author_sort | Kuismanen, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner’s score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment. RESULTS: There were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman’s rho 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5862944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58629442018-03-28 Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, K. Uotila, J. Tech Coloproctol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner’s score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment. RESULTS: There were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman’s rho 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5862944/ /pubmed/29546469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, K. Uotila, J. Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title | Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title_full | Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title_short | Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
title_sort | outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuismanenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment AT nieminenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment AT karjalainenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment AT lehtok outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment AT uotilaj outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment |