Cargando…

Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuismanen, K., Nieminen, K., Karjalainen, K., Lehto, K., Uotila, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9
_version_ 1783308316844228608
author Kuismanen, K.
Nieminen, K.
Karjalainen, K.
Lehto, K.
Uotila, J.
author_facet Kuismanen, K.
Nieminen, K.
Karjalainen, K.
Lehto, K.
Uotila, J.
author_sort Kuismanen, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner’s score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment. RESULTS: There were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman’s rho 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5862944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58629442018-03-28 Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, K. Uotila, J. Tech Coloproctol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner’s score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment. RESULTS: There were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman’s rho 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5862944/ /pubmed/29546469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kuismanen, K.
Nieminen, K.
Karjalainen, K.
Lehto, K.
Uotila, J.
Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title_full Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title_fullStr Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title_short Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
title_sort outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kuismanenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment
AT nieminenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment
AT karjalainenk outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment
AT lehtok outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment
AT uotilaj outcomesofprimaryanalsphincterrepairafterobstetricinjuryandevaluationofanovelthreechoiceassessment