Cargando…

Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of risk categorization for Down syndrome screening between ultrasound scan-based gestational age (GA) and last menstrual period-based gestational age in both first and second trimesters by maternal serum markers. METHODS: Data comprising 4,055 and 4,016 cases of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaksuwat, Pakorn, Sirichotiyakul, Supatra, Luewan, Suchaya, Tongsong, Theera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9687042
_version_ 1783308354679996416
author Chaksuwat, Pakorn
Sirichotiyakul, Supatra
Luewan, Suchaya
Tongsong, Theera
author_facet Chaksuwat, Pakorn
Sirichotiyakul, Supatra
Luewan, Suchaya
Tongsong, Theera
author_sort Chaksuwat, Pakorn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of risk categorization for Down syndrome screening between ultrasound scan-based gestational age (GA) and last menstrual period-based gestational age in both first and second trimesters by maternal serum markers. METHODS: Data comprising 4,055 and 4,016 cases of first and second trimester screening were used. The maternal serum markers were analyzed using the ultrasound-based GA and menstrual age. The subjects whose menstrual age and ultrasound-based GA fell in different trimesters were excluded because the risk could not be calculated due to the different serum markers used in each trimester. The agreement of risk categorization for fetal Down syndrome was evaluated. RESULTS: The agreement of Down syndrome screening in the first and the second trimesters were 92.7% and 89%, respectively. The study found a good agreement of risk categorization by Kappa index, which was 0.615 for the overall screening. The menstrual age had a slight decrease in the detection rate and a lower false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Menstrual age is acceptable in cases of accurate last menstrual period. However, in places where ultrasonography is not readily available, gestational age estimation by menstrual age along with clinical examination that corresponds to the gestational age can be reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5863288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58632882018-04-29 Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers Chaksuwat, Pakorn Sirichotiyakul, Supatra Luewan, Suchaya Tongsong, Theera Obstet Gynecol Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of risk categorization for Down syndrome screening between ultrasound scan-based gestational age (GA) and last menstrual period-based gestational age in both first and second trimesters by maternal serum markers. METHODS: Data comprising 4,055 and 4,016 cases of first and second trimester screening were used. The maternal serum markers were analyzed using the ultrasound-based GA and menstrual age. The subjects whose menstrual age and ultrasound-based GA fell in different trimesters were excluded because the risk could not be calculated due to the different serum markers used in each trimester. The agreement of risk categorization for fetal Down syndrome was evaluated. RESULTS: The agreement of Down syndrome screening in the first and the second trimesters were 92.7% and 89%, respectively. The study found a good agreement of risk categorization by Kappa index, which was 0.615 for the overall screening. The menstrual age had a slight decrease in the detection rate and a lower false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Menstrual age is acceptable in cases of accurate last menstrual period. However, in places where ultrasonography is not readily available, gestational age estimation by menstrual age along with clinical examination that corresponds to the gestational age can be reliable. Hindawi 2018-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5863288/ /pubmed/29707003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9687042 Text en Copyright © 2018 Pakorn Chaksuwat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chaksuwat, Pakorn
Sirichotiyakul, Supatra
Luewan, Suchaya
Tongsong, Theera
Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title_full Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title_fullStr Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title_short Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers
title_sort evaluating the agreement of risk categorization for fetal down syndrome screening between ultrasound-based gestational age and menstrual-based gestational age by maternal serum markers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9687042
work_keys_str_mv AT chaksuwatpakorn evaluatingtheagreementofriskcategorizationforfetaldownsyndromescreeningbetweenultrasoundbasedgestationalageandmenstrualbasedgestationalagebymaternalserummarkers
AT sirichotiyakulsupatra evaluatingtheagreementofriskcategorizationforfetaldownsyndromescreeningbetweenultrasoundbasedgestationalageandmenstrualbasedgestationalagebymaternalserummarkers
AT luewansuchaya evaluatingtheagreementofriskcategorizationforfetaldownsyndromescreeningbetweenultrasoundbasedgestationalageandmenstrualbasedgestationalagebymaternalserummarkers
AT tongsongtheera evaluatingtheagreementofriskcategorizationforfetaldownsyndromescreeningbetweenultrasoundbasedgestationalageandmenstrualbasedgestationalagebymaternalserummarkers