Cargando…
Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801 |
_version_ | 1783308359736229888 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jian J. Rutherford, Jonathan Solomon, Metasebya Cheng, Brian Xuan, Jason R. Gong, Jason Yu, Honggang Xia, Michael L. D. Yang, Xirong Hasenberg, Thomas Curran, Sean |
author_facet | Zhang, Jian J. Rutherford, Jonathan Solomon, Metasebya Cheng, Brian Xuan, Jason R. Gong, Jason Yu, Honggang Xia, Michael L. D. Yang, Xirong Hasenberg, Thomas Curran, Sean |
author_sort | Zhang, Jian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quantitative responses of calculus ablation and retropulsion by performing operator-independent experiments to determine the best fit versus the pulse energy, pulse width, and the number of pulses. METHODS: A lab-built Ho:YAG laser was used as the laser pulse source, with a pulse energy from 0.2 J up to 3.0 J and a pulse width of 150 μs up to 1000 μs. The retropulsion was monitored using a high-speed camera, and the laser-induced craters were evaluated with a 3-D digital microscope. The best fit to the experimental data is done by a design of experiment software. RESULTS: The numerical formulas for the response surfaces of ablation speed and retropulsion amplitude are generated. CONCLUSIONS: The longer the pulse, the less the ablation or retropulsion, while the longer pulse makes the ablation decrease faster than the retropulsion. The best quadratic fit of the response surface for the volume of ablation varied nonlinearly with pulse duration and pulse number. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5863310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58633102018-04-29 Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter Zhang, Jian J. Rutherford, Jonathan Solomon, Metasebya Cheng, Brian Xuan, Jason R. Gong, Jason Yu, Honggang Xia, Michael L. D. Yang, Xirong Hasenberg, Thomas Curran, Sean J Healthc Eng Research Article OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quantitative responses of calculus ablation and retropulsion by performing operator-independent experiments to determine the best fit versus the pulse energy, pulse width, and the number of pulses. METHODS: A lab-built Ho:YAG laser was used as the laser pulse source, with a pulse energy from 0.2 J up to 3.0 J and a pulse width of 150 μs up to 1000 μs. The retropulsion was monitored using a high-speed camera, and the laser-induced craters were evaluated with a 3-D digital microscope. The best fit to the experimental data is done by a design of experiment software. RESULTS: The numerical formulas for the response surfaces of ablation speed and retropulsion amplitude are generated. CONCLUSIONS: The longer the pulse, the less the ablation or retropulsion, while the longer pulse makes the ablation decrease faster than the retropulsion. The best quadratic fit of the response surface for the volume of ablation varied nonlinearly with pulse duration and pulse number. Hindawi 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5863310/ /pubmed/29707187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jian J. Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Jian J. Rutherford, Jonathan Solomon, Metasebya Cheng, Brian Xuan, Jason R. Gong, Jason Yu, Honggang Xia, Michael L. D. Yang, Xirong Hasenberg, Thomas Curran, Sean Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title | Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title_full | Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title_fullStr | Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title_full_unstemmed | Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title_short | Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter |
title_sort | numerical response surfaces of volume of ablation and retropulsion amplitude by settings of ho:yag laser lithotripter |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjianj numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT rutherfordjonathan numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT solomonmetasebya numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT chengbrian numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT xuanjasonr numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT gongjason numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT yuhonggang numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT xiamichaelld numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT yangxirong numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT hasenbergthomas numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter AT curransean numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter |