Cargando…

Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter

OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jian J., Rutherford, Jonathan, Solomon, Metasebya, Cheng, Brian, Xuan, Jason R., Gong, Jason, Yu, Honggang, Xia, Michael L. D., Yang, Xirong, Hasenberg, Thomas, Curran, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801
_version_ 1783308359736229888
author Zhang, Jian J.
Rutherford, Jonathan
Solomon, Metasebya
Cheng, Brian
Xuan, Jason R.
Gong, Jason
Yu, Honggang
Xia, Michael L. D.
Yang, Xirong
Hasenberg, Thomas
Curran, Sean
author_facet Zhang, Jian J.
Rutherford, Jonathan
Solomon, Metasebya
Cheng, Brian
Xuan, Jason R.
Gong, Jason
Yu, Honggang
Xia, Michael L. D.
Yang, Xirong
Hasenberg, Thomas
Curran, Sean
author_sort Zhang, Jian J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quantitative responses of calculus ablation and retropulsion by performing operator-independent experiments to determine the best fit versus the pulse energy, pulse width, and the number of pulses. METHODS: A lab-built Ho:YAG laser was used as the laser pulse source, with a pulse energy from 0.2 J up to 3.0 J and a pulse width of 150 μs up to 1000 μs. The retropulsion was monitored using a high-speed camera, and the laser-induced craters were evaluated with a 3-D digital microscope. The best fit to the experimental data is done by a design of experiment software. RESULTS: The numerical formulas for the response surfaces of ablation speed and retropulsion amplitude are generated. CONCLUSIONS: The longer the pulse, the less the ablation or retropulsion, while the longer pulse makes the ablation decrease faster than the retropulsion. The best quadratic fit of the response surface for the volume of ablation varied nonlinearly with pulse duration and pulse number.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5863310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58633102018-04-29 Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter Zhang, Jian J. Rutherford, Jonathan Solomon, Metasebya Cheng, Brian Xuan, Jason R. Gong, Jason Yu, Honggang Xia, Michael L. D. Yang, Xirong Hasenberg, Thomas Curran, Sean J Healthc Eng Research Article OBJECTIVES: Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quantitative responses of calculus ablation and retropulsion by performing operator-independent experiments to determine the best fit versus the pulse energy, pulse width, and the number of pulses. METHODS: A lab-built Ho:YAG laser was used as the laser pulse source, with a pulse energy from 0.2 J up to 3.0 J and a pulse width of 150 μs up to 1000 μs. The retropulsion was monitored using a high-speed camera, and the laser-induced craters were evaluated with a 3-D digital microscope. The best fit to the experimental data is done by a design of experiment software. RESULTS: The numerical formulas for the response surfaces of ablation speed and retropulsion amplitude are generated. CONCLUSIONS: The longer the pulse, the less the ablation or retropulsion, while the longer pulse makes the ablation decrease faster than the retropulsion. The best quadratic fit of the response surface for the volume of ablation varied nonlinearly with pulse duration and pulse number. Hindawi 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5863310/ /pubmed/29707187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jian J. Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Jian J.
Rutherford, Jonathan
Solomon, Metasebya
Cheng, Brian
Xuan, Jason R.
Gong, Jason
Yu, Honggang
Xia, Michael L. D.
Yang, Xirong
Hasenberg, Thomas
Curran, Sean
Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title_full Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title_fullStr Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title_short Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter
title_sort numerical response surfaces of volume of ablation and retropulsion amplitude by settings of ho:yag laser lithotripter
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261801
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjianj numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT rutherfordjonathan numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT solomonmetasebya numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT chengbrian numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT xuanjasonr numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT gongjason numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT yuhonggang numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT xiamichaelld numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT yangxirong numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT hasenbergthomas numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter
AT curransean numericalresponsesurfacesofvolumeofablationandretropulsionamplitudebysettingsofhoyaglaserlithotripter