Cargando…
Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949 |
_version_ | 1783308368718331904 |
---|---|
author | Hjertberg, Linda Uustal, Eva Pihl, Sofia Blomberg, Marie |
author_facet | Hjertberg, Linda Uustal, Eva Pihl, Sofia Blomberg, Marie |
author_sort | Hjertberg, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman's medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. RESULTS: The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5863348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58633482018-04-29 Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor Hjertberg, Linda Uustal, Eva Pihl, Sofia Blomberg, Marie Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman's medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. RESULTS: The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965. Hindawi 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5863348/ /pubmed/29707565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949 Text en Copyright © 2018 Linda Hjertberg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hjertberg, Linda Uustal, Eva Pihl, Sofia Blomberg, Marie Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title | Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title_full | Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title_fullStr | Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title_short | Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor |
title_sort | maternal body mass index and anovaginal distance in active phase of term labor |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hjertberglinda maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor AT uustaleva maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor AT pihlsofia maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor AT blombergmarie maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor |