Cargando…

Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjertberg, Linda, Uustal, Eva, Pihl, Sofia, Blomberg, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949
_version_ 1783308368718331904
author Hjertberg, Linda
Uustal, Eva
Pihl, Sofia
Blomberg, Marie
author_facet Hjertberg, Linda
Uustal, Eva
Pihl, Sofia
Blomberg, Marie
author_sort Hjertberg, Linda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman's medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. RESULTS: The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5863348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58633482018-04-29 Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor Hjertberg, Linda Uustal, Eva Pihl, Sofia Blomberg, Marie Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman's medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. RESULTS: The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965. Hindawi 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5863348/ /pubmed/29707565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949 Text en Copyright © 2018 Linda Hjertberg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hjertberg, Linda
Uustal, Eva
Pihl, Sofia
Blomberg, Marie
Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_full Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_fullStr Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_full_unstemmed Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_short Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_sort maternal body mass index and anovaginal distance in active phase of term labor
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949
work_keys_str_mv AT hjertberglinda maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT uustaleva maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT pihlsofia maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT blombergmarie maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor