Cargando…

Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to test the hypothesis that no facial soft tissue changes occur after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion (RME), in order to provide a reference for orthodontists. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jing, Li, Cui-Ying, Jiang, Jiu-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29562914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-018-0162-8
_version_ 1783308373409660928
author Huang, Jing
Li, Cui-Ying
Jiang, Jiu-Hui
author_facet Huang, Jing
Li, Cui-Ying
Jiang, Jiu-Hui
author_sort Huang, Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to test the hypothesis that no facial soft tissue changes occur after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion (RME), in order to provide a reference for orthodontists. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were electronically and manually searched up to December 2017, and randomized controlled, clinical controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective studies where soft tissue changes were measured before and after nonsurgical RME were identified. Study appraisal and synthesis were performed by two reviewers who completed the study selection and quality assessment procedures independently and in duplicate. Data from the involved studies were pooled using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 1762 articles were identified after the removal of duplicates. After selection and quality assessment, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 13 articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The quality of the involved studies was relatively moderate. Pre-expansion, postexpansion, and postretention data were pooled. The nasal width, alar base width, and distances from the lower lips to the E line showed significant changes after expansion. Moreover, after retention, the nasal width, mouth width, upper philtrum width, and distance from the lower lip to the E line showed significant increases relative to the baseline values. Limitations of the present study included the moderate quality of the included studies and the fact that the results were based on short-term observations of patients in the growth phase. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that RME results in a significantly increased nasal width, mouth width, upper philtrum width, and distance from the lower lip to the E line after the retention phase. However, the clinical importance of these findings is questionable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13005-018-0162-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5863368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58633682018-03-27 Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Jing Li, Cui-Ying Jiang, Jiu-Hui Head Face Med Review BACKGROUND: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to test the hypothesis that no facial soft tissue changes occur after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion (RME), in order to provide a reference for orthodontists. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were electronically and manually searched up to December 2017, and randomized controlled, clinical controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective studies where soft tissue changes were measured before and after nonsurgical RME were identified. Study appraisal and synthesis were performed by two reviewers who completed the study selection and quality assessment procedures independently and in duplicate. Data from the involved studies were pooled using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 1762 articles were identified after the removal of duplicates. After selection and quality assessment, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 13 articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The quality of the involved studies was relatively moderate. Pre-expansion, postexpansion, and postretention data were pooled. The nasal width, alar base width, and distances from the lower lips to the E line showed significant changes after expansion. Moreover, after retention, the nasal width, mouth width, upper philtrum width, and distance from the lower lip to the E line showed significant increases relative to the baseline values. Limitations of the present study included the moderate quality of the included studies and the fact that the results were based on short-term observations of patients in the growth phase. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that RME results in a significantly increased nasal width, mouth width, upper philtrum width, and distance from the lower lip to the E line after the retention phase. However, the clinical importance of these findings is questionable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13005-018-0162-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5863368/ /pubmed/29562914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-018-0162-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, Jing
Li, Cui-Ying
Jiang, Jiu-Hui
Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29562914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-018-0162-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjing facialsofttissuechangesafternonsurgicalrapidmaxillaryexpansionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT licuiying facialsofttissuechangesafternonsurgicalrapidmaxillaryexpansionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangjiuhui facialsofttissuechangesafternonsurgicalrapidmaxillaryexpansionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis