Cargando…

Gray blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance for improved detection of myocardial scar

BACKGROUND: Low scar-to-blood contrast in late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MRI limits the visualization of scars adjacent to the blood pool. Nulling the blood signal improves scar detection but results in lack of contrast between myocardium and blood, which makes clinical evaluation of LGE images more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fahmy, Ahmed S., Neisius, Ulf, Tsao, Connie W., Berg, Sophie, Goddu, Elizabeth, Pierce, Patrick, Basha, Tamer A., Ngo, Long, Manning, Warren J., Nezafat, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29562921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0442-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Low scar-to-blood contrast in late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MRI limits the visualization of scars adjacent to the blood pool. Nulling the blood signal improves scar detection but results in lack of contrast between myocardium and blood, which makes clinical evaluation of LGE images more difficult. METHODS: GB-LGE contrast is achieved through partial suppression of the blood signal using T(2) magnetization preparation between the inversion pulse and acquisition. The timing parameters of GB-LGE sequence are determined by optimizing a cost-function representing the desired tissue contrast. The proposed 3D GB-LGE sequence was evaluated using phantoms, human subjects (n = 45) and a swine model of myocardial infarction (n = 5). Two independent readers subjectively evaluated the image quality and ability to identify and localize scarring in GB-LGE compared to black-blood LGE (BB-LGE) (i.e., with complete blood nulling) and conventional (bright-blood) LGE. RESULTS: GB-LGE contrast was successfully generated in phantoms and all in-vivo scans. The scar-to-blood contrast was improved in GB-LGE compared to conventional LGE in humans (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) and in animals (1.5 ± 0.2 vs. -0.03 ± 0.2). In patients, GB-LGE detected more tissue scarring compared to BB-LGE and conventional LGE. The subjective scores of the GB-LGE ability for localizing LV scar and detecting papillary scar were improved as compared with both BB-LGE (P < 0.024) and conventional LGE (P < 0.001). In the swine infarction model, GB-LGE scores for the ability to localize LV scar scores were consistently higher than those of both BB-LGE and conventional-LGE. CONCLUSION: GB-LGE imaging improves the ability to identify and localize myocardial scarring compared to both BB-LGE and conventional LGE. Further studies are warranted to histologically validate GB-LGE. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12968-018-0442-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.